Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote: invalid.
You really need to eat some humble pie for as long as your posts remain clinical and racist (wont use biased) towards TCs no TC will take you seriously,
I think Kiks is biased against criminals like you in the north, and not against law abiding TCs anywhere else in the world, like himself.
I am not a criminal and havent you heard we have disowned him he has now become a full fledged GC, he argues your sides viewpoints more than you GCs.
You live in and benefit from a criminal regime, built on the ill-gotten lands and misery of displaced people, which amounts to the same thing. How can you "become" a GC? Just because he holds different views to you that doesn't make him GC. You calling him that makes you a racist.
VP is a Racists with Fascism on top of it.!
If VP was consistent with his accusations, he would be calling our good friend Bananiot a "Turk"!
Bananiot is something you will never be, unbiased he argues for both sides and his arguements ring true, I would trust him with my future in a unified state not even BBF but you I dont even trust with the current divide.
More Fart Alerts. Show me anything Bananiot argues against wrong doings by the TCs and Turkey, any more or less than I argue wrong doing done by the GCs. You are just trying to get yourself out of the jam you put yourself into with your, dare I say it, your biased views towards my comments, just because you do not like to hear the truth. Your reactions are and have always been transparent.
You like Bananiot just because he supported the disguised Partition Annan Plan (which I'm sure he was fooled by it back in 2004) and he also points out wrongs done by the GCs. You also claimed he is your friend (in real life). Show me another GC that you would like to live with who was against the AP or BBF under Confederation. Tell me which GCs you will live with who support True Federation, True Democracy, Human Rights, International Laws and EU Principles.?
You would have to ask Bananiot where he has argued against TCs or Turkey that would be much quicker but saying that his approach and understanding of the TC viewpoint is far far greater than yours and he is someone we could trust with our future, you and people like you will fortunately never be given that opportunity as you are not to be trusted because of your openly biased and distorted views.
How can I get this into your thick skull I would not demand the AP or Turkeys guarantees with Bananiot as it would not be necessary, unfortunately he is a mere minority and therefore in order to keep people like you in check we need all the safeguards and guarantees we can get plus some.
Actually, you need to explain to me what is it that Bananiot shows the wrongs done by the TCs and Turkey and not by himself. You are the one who has made the below claim, therefore you prove to us that what you claim to be true. Sounds to me like you have gotten your balls squeezed in the vice again and now trying to wiggle your way out of it.! Ouch.!
Bananiot is something you will never be, unbiased he argues for both sides and his arguements ring true
But lets put that aside for the moment and say, just because Fascists are irrational people and no not like to hear what they don't want to hear, why do I have to be balanced in what I write. Can I not write what is what without having to criticize another unrelated circumstances that may have also happened by the GCs.? Why is it my responsibility to tell you what they did or did not do.? Why do I need to justify what I write as long as there are elements of truth to it.? I'm giving you my opinion on the subject at hand. You never criticize any wrongs done by the TCs and Turkey, so what does that make you, biased.?? Oh I forgot, you said you ONCE criticized the building of the bridge by Ledra Palace.!
That was very big of you, VP,....................... not.!!