by bill cobbett » Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:56 pm
OK my take on this, stress it is a personal take, others may as ever know better...
The Regime is in Coventry > The UN Resolutions call on member states to take no action to recognise it, so it is public policy in every member state to not recognise the Regime and to respect the Republic as the sole authority (from which follow the FIR and ports issue) and to also respect the (single) Sovereignty of CY . As far as aware the rseolutions don't go in to specifics like FIRs and direct trade out of ports, but these follow on as a consequence.
Shipping rules are diff from airport/FIR regulations. Shippers working out of Occupied Ports need a bill of lading and it's up the the receiving country whether to accept or refuse the bill, whether the goods meet local standars and whether duties have been paid... a lot will presumably depend on the nature of the goods.
Then on top of that are an awful lot of EU Regulations, which probably prevent direct trade to EU ports of any goods that don't meet the sort of EU standards that goods travelling across the buffer zone have to meet. The effect of these is prob to prevent goods going straight to EU ports, certainly without the risk of being turned away for not meeting EU standards and also, and most, most importantly, for being without the clearance paperwork from the appropriate department of the Republic.