Insancığım ...........which one do u like ?
Federation or Partition............
halil wrote:Insancığım ...........which one do u like ?
Federation or Partition............
insan wrote:The ones who applauded the biased reports of UN which led the recognition of the GC administration as the sole representative of whole Cyprus in 1964 and onwards;
insan wrote:halil wrote:Insancığım ...........which one do u like ?
Federation or Partition............
Halil'ciğim; you well know that until about two years ago i was a fierce supporter of a federation... but not till then...
I even have doubts about after an agreed partition whether the politicians and big capital owners of 2 communities would get on well and contribute to each other's economy, have fairly good interstate relations or keep undermineing each other...
Ps: Görüşemeyiyoruk bu aralar hiç...
Get Real! wrote:insan wrote:The ones who applauded the biased reports of UN which led the recognition of the GC administration as the sole representative of whole Cyprus in 1964 and onwards;
You're fantasizing rubbish again to elevate your importance! The RoC came into existence in 1960 and CONTINUED to function as a sovereign UN member country right up to today, MINUS a trouble making and useless Ottoman remnant minority that contributed NEXT TO ZERO from the start!
The UN has already worked out a formula based on ownership of problem properties. According to their study, problematic Greek Cypriot properties cover about 1.5 million donums (skales). They estimate that about half a million will be returned to the Greek Cypriots as a result of territorial adjustments. Turkish Cypriot properties in the south are also about half a million skales, and these have been taken over by the Turkish Cypriot state and exchanged for Greek Cypriot land. This land in the south can be given to Greek Cypriots in exchange, leaving about 700,000 skales out of which half will be retuned and the rest compensated.
.Security and guarantees are issues that would be decided at a future international conference, once the property issue is resolved. Britain is willing to give up its interventionist rights, while the Turkish State Minister Bagis recently spoke of the possibility of a complete withdrawal of troops
The property issue cannot differ much from Anan 5 as it is not realistic that the Turkish Cypriots who voted yes in 2004 to be asked to vote on a worse map. It would be equally unrealistic that the Greek Cypriots who voted no in 2004 would vote yes to a plan that did not include Morphou.
The UN believes that Christofias’ proposal for Famagusta is the most dangerous bait for partition. If the Cyprus problem is declared unsolvable by the end of the year then this proposal could be a tool in Turkey’s hands. The return of Famagasta in return for removal of the isolation of the Turkish Cypriots and removing all blocks to the chapters in Turkey’s EU entry negotiations, would solve all her problems, except that of Cyprus
The European solution that all those who are against federation are calling for will come at a future stage with recognition of the TRNC in return for the buffer zone being given back to the Republic of Cyprus and the entry of the north into the EU as a separate state.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests