Nikitas
My conclusion is to grow up, fast, and adopt the same tactics. National self interest comes first. The rest follows from there. And as is well known, success comes from programmed progress towards defined goals. In our case the goals not only are not defined, they are not even agreed by the various political parties and factions.
As to the specific problem of Britain in Cyprus, I have said many times, to the point I sound obsessive: any territorial arrangement must specify that the British bases burden GC territory and that if and when the British leave the territory reverts to the GC component state.
Believe it! If the British leave and the territorial aspect of their bases is not settled beforehand we are going to relive 1963 and 1974 combined.
In a way the avoidance of the issue by GC politicians and the Cypriot public as a whole shows how naive and politicallly immature we are. Only fools would accept a geopolitical bomb like this, assuming they even realise the issue is there.
I will only ponder over your first paragraph. The British bases is a different issue all together. You say that we should grow up. I take this as meaning that we have been very immature so far and I totally agree with you. I suppose that when you write that we should adopt the same tactics you mean a long term policy that will use specific strategy to reach specific, realistic and feasible goals. This policy will be followed through no matter who is in office. This is in fact what mature nations do and as you said we have not yet shown any signs of growing up.
So we define our interests and we agree as to what they are. Next we embark on the long and difficult path of realising our aspirations which of course need to move in the sphere of the feasible and not the desirable. Since we are a very small nation and we cannot by ourselves further our interests we should strive to make them compatible (I am sure there is a better word but it does not click right now) with the interests of the powers that matter in this world and more so in this part of the world. Anyone can see that these powers are primarily the US and Britain (probably Turkey too!). Thus, we cannot have everything our way, we cannot go for the maximum but we need to make compromises. This is not a new fruit but it has always been this way. Our myopic stance over the years has cost us half of Cyprus mainly because we went for the maximum, thinking that we were entitled to it because we had the right our numbers gave to us (majority). By the time we realised that those that matter in this area had conflicting interests, it was too late and we started crying over the ruins of 1974.
So, yes Nikitas, I agree with you entirely, provided we take a long look at the above, understand where we went wrong and try to avoid making the same mistakes. If on the other hand we spend our energy trying to find out who is a friend and who is a foe, I foresee more misery in the future but this time round it would make no difference if the remnants of us blame everything on the Brits or whoever.
In a nutshell, if ever we loved this country, we should have made sure we had common interests with the countries that matter. Instead we took pride in bashing these countries and threatening them to form an alliance with their deadliest enemies, especially during the cold war period. Anyone who still wonders why we ended up as we did, please apply to GR and the other bash patriots of this forum who are making a last stand on morality high grounds and promise to teach principles to all evil institutions.