Cyprus-Forum.com

[CBBB]

Bin Laden among latest Wikileaks Afghan revelations

New details, including reports on Osama Bin Laden dating from 2006, have emerged from 90,000 US military files leaked to the Wikileaks website.

Several files track Bin Laden, although the US has said it had received no reliable information on him "in years".

The details come as the Pentagon investigates who leaked the classified documents, in an act the White House says could harm national security.

Wikileaks describes the documents as battlefield and intelligence reports.

It says they were compiled by a variety of military units between 2004 and 2009.

In August 2006, a US intelligence report placed Bin Laden at a meeting in Quetta, over the border in Pakistan.

It said he and others - including the Taliban leader, Mullah Omar - were organising suicide attacks in Afghanistan.

The targets were unknown, the report said, but the bombers were carrying explosives from Pakistan.

Nearly 200 files concern Task Force 373, a US special forces unit whose job was to kill or capture Taliban or al-Qaeda commanders.
Related stories

The records log 144 incidents involving Afghan civilian casualties, including 195 fatalities, the UK's Guardian newspaper reports.

The Wikileaks dossier includes an incident in June 2007 when the unit engaged in a firefight with what were believed to be insurgents. An airstrike was called in.

Seven of those killed were Afghan police officers. A further four were injured. The incident was labelled a misunderstanding.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said the leak did not divulge anything new about the nature of the war in Afghanistan but said the details revealed could be damaging.

"[It] has a potential to be very harmful to those that are in our military, those that are co-operating with our military and those that are working to keep us safe," he said.

As stated Gasman, I doubt if these revelations are the result of the 'WikiLeaks' controversy since they are far too recent an event.

The mention of Osama bin Laden in the article you have posted are concerned with a much earlier time, the matter now reported is current.

You sure it is not future?

[Schnauzer]

As stated Gasman, I doubt if these revelations are the result of the 'WikiLeaks' controversy since they are far too recent an event.

The mention of Osama bin Laden in the article you have posted are concerned with a much earlier time, the matter now reported is current

You sure it is not future?

As far as I am aware, the 'WikiLeaks' in question here (those that deal with Osama bin Laden) contain references to matters of the past, what I am in the process of conveying (through a very difficult route) is what took place very recently.

I have received some more information to add to that which I already have, upon completion, I will immediately present it to this thread.

[apc2010]

As stated Gasman, I doubt if these revelations are the result of the 'WikiLeaks' controversy since they are far too recent an event.

The mention of Osama bin Laden in the article you have posted are concerned with a much earlier time, the matter now reported is current

You sure it is not future?

As far as I am aware, the 'WikiLeaks' in question here (those that deal with Osama bin Laden) contain references to matters of the past, what I am in the process of conveying (through a very difficult route) is what took place very recently.

I have received some more information to add to that which I already have, upon completion, I will immediately present it to this thread.

Just a thought ,if you have info, rather than C/forum , I think cnn/reuters or even cyprus mail may pay you for this ...

Hey , british newspapers bought the hitler diaries.......

[Schnauzer]

As stated Gasman, I doubt if these revelations are the result of the 'WikiLeaks' controversy since they are far too recent an event.

The mention of Osama bin Laden in the article you have posted are concerned with a much earlier time, the matter now reported is current

You sure it is not future?

As far as I am aware, the 'WikiLeaks' in question here (those that deal with Osama bin Laden) contain references to matters of the past, what I am in the process of conveying (through a very difficult route) is what took place very recently.

I have received some more information to add to that which I already have, upon completion, I will immediately present it to this thread.

Just a thought ,if you have info, rather than C/forum , I think cnn/reuters or even cyprus mail may pay you for this ...

Hey , british newspapers bought the hitler diaries.......

It behoves me to respect the confidentiality and trust of others that I should NOT capitalize on any of the foregoing information.

Any action contrary to one's word is of detriment to the person, I would never expose myself to such a reproach my friend.

[apc2010]

As stated Gasman, I doubt if these revelations are the result of the 'WikiLeaks' controversy since they are far too recent an event.

The mention of Osama bin Laden in the article you have posted are concerned with a much earlier time, the matter now reported is current

You sure it is not future?

As far as I am aware, the 'WikiLeaks' in question here (those that deal with Osama bin Laden) contain references to matters of the past, what I am in the process of conveying (through a very difficult route) is what took place very recently.

I have received some more information to add to that which I already have, upon completion, I will immediately present it to this thread.

Just a thought ,if you have info, rather than C/forum , I think cnn/reuters or even cyprus mail may pay you for this ...

Hey , british newspapers bought the hitler diaries.......

It behoves me to respect the confidentiality and trust of others that I should NOT capitalize on any of the foregoing information.

Any action contrary to one's word is of detriment to the person, I would never expose myself to such a reproach my friend.

And you trust this bunch of forumers with world breaking news ....
btw can i have your directions to atlantis please .....

[Schnauzer]

As stated Gasman, I doubt if these revelations are the result of the 'WikiLeaks' controversy since they are far too recent an event.

The mention of Osama bin Laden in the article you have posted are concerned with a much earlier time, the matter now reported is current

You sure it is not future?

As far as I am aware, the 'WikiLeaks' in question here (those that deal with Osama bin Laden) contain references to matters of the past, what I am in the process of conveying (through a very difficult route) is what took place very recently.

I have received some more information to add to that which I already have, upon completion, I will immediately present it to this thread.

Just a thought ,if you have info, rather than C/forum , I think cnn/reuters or even cyprus mail may pay you for this ...

Hey , british newspapers bought the hitler diaries.......

It behoves me to respect the confidentiality and trust of others that I should NOT capitalize on any of the foregoing information.

Any action contrary to one's word is of detriment to the person, I would never expose myself to such a reproach my friend.

And you trust this bunch of forumers with world breaking news ....
btw can i have your directions to atlantis please .....

There is little that this 'Bunch of Forumers' (as YOU refer to them) can achieve by passing on any information contained here since it is incomplete and therefore of little value (other than a matter of interest) without completion.

I am confident that my own position in this matter will eventually prove that I can be relied on to act in absolute accordance with any request made of me, to protect the sources of information by those who place such a sure dependence upon my word to do so.

Your reference to 'Atlantis' is not really appreciated, it denotes ridicule and , as such, diminishes your own character somewhat. IMHO (of course).

[CBBB]

As stated Gasman, I doubt if these revelations are the result of the 'WikiLeaks' controversy since they are far too recent an event.

The mention of Osama bin Laden in the article you have posted are concerned with a much earlier time, the matter now reported is current

You sure it is not future?

As far as I am aware, the 'WikiLeaks' in question here (those that deal with Osama bin Laden) contain references to matters of the past, what I am in the process of conveying (through a very difficult route) is what took place very recently.

I have received some more information to add to that which I already have, upon completion, I will immediately present it to this thread.

Just a thought ,if you have info, rather than C/forum , I think cnn/reuters or even cyprus mail may pay you for this ...

Hey , british newspapers bought the hitler diaries.......

It behoves me to respect the confidentiality and trust of others that I should NOT capitalize on any of the foregoing information.

Any action contrary to one's word is of detriment to the person, I would never expose myself to such a reproach my friend.

And you trust this bunch of forumers with world breaking news ....
btw can i have your directions to atlantis please .....

There is little that this 'Bunch of Forumers' (as YOU refer to them) can achieve by passing on any information contained here since it is incomplete and therefore of little value (other than a matter of interest) without completion.

I am confident that my own position in this matter will eventually prove that I can be relied on to act in absolute accordance with any request made of me, to protect the sources of information by those who place such a sure dependence upon my word to do so.

Your reference to 'Atlantis' is not really appreciated, it denotes ridicule and , as such, diminishes your own character somewhat. IMHO (of course).

Let's face it, Schnauzer doesn't know where Atlantis is, just where Osama is.

For directions to Atlantis ask SG1!

[apc2010]

cbbb, you cynic ......my mate Lord Lucan believes him....

[Schnauzer]

As stated Gasman, I doubt if these revelations are the result of the 'WikiLeaks' controversy since they are far too recent an event.

The mention of Osama bin Laden in the article you have posted are concerned with a much earlier time, the matter now reported is current

You sure it is not future?

As far as I am aware, the 'WikiLeaks' in question here (those that deal with Osama bin Laden) contain references to matters of the past, what I am in the process of conveying (through a very difficult route) is what took place very recently.

I have received some more information to add to that which I already have, upon completion, I will immediately present it to this thread.

Just a thought ,if you have info, rather than C/forum , I think cnn/reuters or even cyprus mail may pay you for this ...

Hey , british newspapers bought the hitler diaries.......

It behoves me to respect the confidentiality and trust of others that I should NOT capitalize on any of the foregoing information.

Any action contrary to one's word is of detriment to the person, I would never expose myself to such a reproach my friend.

And you trust this bunch of forumers with world breaking news ....
btw can i have your directions to atlantis please .....

There is little that this 'Bunch of Forumers' (as YOU refer to them) can achieve by passing on any information contained here since it is incomplete and therefore of little value (other than a matter of interest) without completion.

I am confident that my own position in this matter will eventually prove that I can be relied on to act in absolute accordance with any request made of me, to protect the sources of information by those who place such a sure dependence upon my word to do so.

Your reference to 'Atlantis' is not really appreciated, it denotes ridicule and , as such, diminishes your own character somewhat. IMHO (of course).

Let's face it, Schnauzer doesn't know where Atlantis is, just where Osama is.

WAS, actually CBBB.

As for his location NOW, one would have to join the ranks of the unknowing, for surely his life would be forfeit were his whereabouts common knowledge.

There are so many who would relish the news of his demise, I'm sure that those who now have the pleasure of his company will protect him (for their own purposes) from all manner of folk.

[apc2010]

If he has been caught , and r moat dead does madeline mccann win the world hide and seek comp.????