Viewpoint wrote:bill cobbett wrote:Viewpoint wrote:bill cobbett wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Two fucking years of talks and this is the best he could come up with, bloody hell time for this guy to get thrown out of office.
.... err.... that might go down as Turkish Intransigence and Lack of Goodwill I fear VP.
The rejected old offer after 2 years will be viewed as intrangience by the internaional community, well done christofias.
Fear you may not have read the bit in the statement where Our Beloved Pres X talks about an international conference.... did you miss it VP?
So Pres X seems to be offering a lot more than you have posted in the past day or so than just direct trade (with the EU's help) from Famagusta Port .... with a little goodwill on your part over Varosi.
Want another chance to show some Goodwill and a lot less Intransigence now VP and others???????
hey bill the meeting was our idea he rejected it now hes trying to make out its his, typical GC:
No VP and others, read the statement again please, What he's saying is to reach as much agreement as poss on the basis of the UN's interpretation of BBF ( and prob of the High Level Agreements) and then go to arbitration.
Whereas Errorgluey (and I fear you) have gone way off the bounds of the UN parameters in recent months. Have taken the hard line with your own interpretation of BBF, which we all know is the confederation model, or at the very least a plan which over time tends towards Partition.
Get back on track within the UN parameters is what Pres X is saying, agree as much as poss within those guidelines and then international conf to fill in gaps.
That is a lot diff from what Errorgluey has been saying, which is to stall the process, blame Pres X , and hoping to get what he wants from a conf.