by Nikitas » Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:22 am
At the time, the summer of 1974, there were statements by Turkish officials that taking over the whole of Cyprus would have been politically untenable. I vaguely recall Bulent Ecevit making such a statement to the BBC, but cannot swear to it.
Secondly, military analysts had pointed out, again in 1974, that taking over the whole island would have made insurgency much easier than it would be across a demarcation line.
Third, taking over the whole island would have removed Greek control in the form of officers in the National Guard, over the Cypriot forces. The Turks relied on the Greeks to keep the Cypriots under control. Obviously there is no concrete proof of such an agreement, but.... at least one general commanding the NG was removed from his post when he responded "dynamically" to Turkish provocations in the Green Line.
Fourth, the Turks need the RoC to put the legalising signature to any settlement they want to bring about. The only party with the power to legalise an agreement is the RoC. Taking over the whole island would have practically extinguished the RoC and would have made Turkey fully liable for occupying a UN member nation.
The list can go on but the above is an indication.