The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


So why didnt turkey capture all of cyprus?

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

So why didnt turkey capture all of cyprus?

Postby thegame24 » Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:55 am

Considering they think so much of themselves and think Cyprus is turkish, why didnt they come and get it?

I see so many say that we are lucky they didnt and still havnt taken all of cyprus.

so yea what is the reason or did the brits say, "thats all your getting"
thegame24
Member
Member
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:41 pm

Postby Bananiot » Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:16 am

Bloody hell, another maniac ...
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby Nikitas » Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:22 am

At the time, the summer of 1974, there were statements by Turkish officials that taking over the whole of Cyprus would have been politically untenable. I vaguely recall Bulent Ecevit making such a statement to the BBC, but cannot swear to it.

Secondly, military analysts had pointed out, again in 1974, that taking over the whole island would have made insurgency much easier than it would be across a demarcation line.

Third, taking over the whole island would have removed Greek control in the form of officers in the National Guard, over the Cypriot forces. The Turks relied on the Greeks to keep the Cypriots under control. Obviously there is no concrete proof of such an agreement, but.... at least one general commanding the NG was removed from his post when he responded "dynamically" to Turkish provocations in the Green Line.

Fourth, the Turks need the RoC to put the legalising signature to any settlement they want to bring about. The only party with the power to legalise an agreement is the RoC. Taking over the whole island would have practically extinguished the RoC and would have made Turkey fully liable for occupying a UN member nation.

The list can go on but the above is an indication.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby thegame24 » Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:29 am

Ok cool, thanks for that
thegame24
Member
Member
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:41 pm

Postby thegame24 » Wed Jul 21, 2010 3:44 am

Oh another question, why is Varosha deserted?
thegame24
Member
Member
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:41 pm

Postby Oracle » Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:00 am

If they took over the whole island?

By that, do you mean also taking over the British Base areas?
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby thegame24 » Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:06 pm

well if it means that yea. Many turks say we are lucky they didnt take all of it.

I always reply, why didnt you?

yea whats with varosha is it under their occupation or is it a no mans land?
thegame24
Member
Member
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:41 pm

Postby Acikgoz » Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:13 pm

For someone so opinionated you really have very little knowledge.
User avatar
Acikgoz
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:09 pm
Location: Where all activities are embargoed

Postby thegame24 » Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:23 pm

I dont understand why varosha is left untouched since it was the best area you would thinks turks would have relished taking it.


Im trying to make sence of certain things.
thegame24
Member
Member
 
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 6:41 pm

Postby runaway » Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:24 pm

I guess we did not know what to do with the south cypriots. Deport them to Greece, Lebanon, Egypt or pour them to the Mediterranean. Which one would you prefer south cypriot?
User avatar
runaway
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1723
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:41 pm
Location: Istanbul

Next

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest