Cyprus-Forum.com

[Paphitis]

slight bias

?

I can only suggest you look up Washington Times bias yourself to see how 'slight' it is.

I can only suggest you go get yourself a man and get shagged!

If Oracle states that the Washington Times is reputable, you will say it is not. If Oracle states it is day, you will state it is night. If Oracle states she is a vegetarian, you will say she is not.

Well I am sorry. The Washington Times has a market to cater to just like any other news outlet. It does not mean it is not a quality rag.

You need a good shag!

[AWE]

The Washington Times was founded in 1982 by Unification Church leader Sun Myung Moon [ 1 ] , who has said that he is the Messiah and the Second Coming of Christ and is fulfilling Jesus ' unfinished mission. [ 2 ] [ 3 ] Bo Hi Pak , Moon's chief aide, was the founding president and the ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Times

Quality rag then?



I know should not use wiki but none the less...

[Acikgoz]

It is a quality rag with a strong bias.

These guys don't care, as long as the bias doesn't work against them.

[Oracle]

I conclude that no one can counter the arguments presented by Daniel Pipes because they have resorted to shooting the messenger [Washington Times].

Well done Mr Pipes; Turkey is truly a hypocrite and a tyrant of the worst kind.

[insan]

I conclude that no one can counter the arguments presented by Daniel Pipes because they have resorted to shooting the messenger [Washington Times].

Well done Mr Pipes; Turkey is truly a hypocrite and a tyrant of the worst kind.

Dear, please spare some time and escape from your lil' superficial world... that article is just a small part of usual "obedience game"... Don't be surprised if he soon concludes something disapointing for you... I really wouldn't like to shatter your wet dreams but you really asked for it...

A New Axis: The Emerging Turkish-Israeli Entente

by Daniel Pipes
National Interest
Winter 1997/98

The Turkish-Israeli partnership offers many advantages to the United States. Most ambitiously, it could provide the nucleus of an American-oriented regional partnership made up of democratic allies -- as opposed to the authoritarian rulers upon which Washington has relied for five decades. Eisenhower's Baghdad Pact, Nixon's "twin pillars," and Reagan's "strategic consensus" depended mostly on dubious monarchs (Iraq's weak Hashemites, Iran's bombastic shah, the egregious Saudis) and ugly authoritarians (such as the Mubarak regime in Egypt today). But the Turkish-Israeli alignment creates, for the first time, the possibility of developing an alliance of pro-American democracies, such as exists in Europe. If cultivated carefully, Jordan might join in, with more states (perhaps Kuwait) adhering later. The final result could be that most elusive of all goals: a more peaceable Middle East.

http://www.danielpipes.org/293/a-new-ax ... li-entente

[humanist]

Yeah but Washington isn't prepared to do anything about it lip service

[Oracle]

I conclude that no one can counter the arguments presented by Daniel Pipes because they have resorted to shooting the messenger [Washington Times].

Well done Mr Pipes; Turkey is truly a hypocrite and a tyrant of the worst kind.

Dear, please spare some time and escape from your lil' superficial world... that article is just a small part of usual "obedience game"... Don't be surprised if he soon concludes something disapointing for you... I really wouldn't like to shatter your wet dreams but you really asked for it...

A New Axis: The Emerging Turkish-Israeli Entente

by Daniel Pipes
National Interest
Winter 1997/98

The Turkish-Israeli partnership offers many advantages to the United States. Most ambitiously, it could provide the nucleus of an American-oriented regional partnership made up of democratic allies -- as opposed to the authoritarian rulers upon which Washington has relied for five decades. Eisenhower's Baghdad Pact, Nixon's "twin pillars," and Reagan's "strategic consensus" depended mostly on dubious monarchs (Iraq's weak Hashemites, Iran's bombastic shah, the egregious Saudis) and ugly authoritarians (such as the Mubarak regime in Egypt today). But the Turkish-Israeli alignment creates, for the first time, the possibility of developing an alliance of pro-American democracies, such as exists in Europe. If cultivated carefully, Jordan might join in, with more states (perhaps Kuwait) adhering later. The final result could be that most elusive of all goals: a more peaceable Middle East.

http://www.danielpipes.org/293/a-new-ax ... li-entente

Which is why he is an admirable up-to-the-minute reporter ... he addresses this in his opening statement:

Turkish policy toward Israel, historically warm and only a decade ago approaching full alliance, has cooled since Islamists took power in Ankara in 2002.

Thank you for proving he knows what he is talking about -- no one would have disputed that analysis a decade ago; but NOW things are different. Piratis' prophecy on "change of power"

[insan]

I conclude that no one can counter the arguments presented by Daniel Pipes because they have resorted to shooting the messenger [Washington Times].

Well done Mr Pipes; Turkey is truly a hypocrite and a tyrant of the worst kind.

Dear, please spare some time and escape from your lil' superficial world... that article is just a small part of usual "obedience game"... Don't be surprised if he soon concludes something disapointing for you... I really wouldn't like to shatter your wet dreams but you really asked for it...

A New Axis: The Emerging Turkish-Israeli Entente

by Daniel Pipes
National Interest
Winter 1997/98

The Turkish-Israeli partnership offers many advantages to the United States. Most ambitiously, it could provide the nucleus of an American-oriented regional partnership made up of democratic allies -- as opposed to the authoritarian rulers upon which Washington has relied for five decades. Eisenhower's Baghdad Pact, Nixon's "twin pillars," and Reagan's "strategic consensus" depended mostly on dubious monarchs (Iraq's weak Hashemites, Iran's bombastic shah, the egregious Saudis) and ugly authoritarians (such as the Mubarak regime in Egypt today). But the Turkish-Israeli alignment creates, for the first time, the possibility of developing an alliance of pro-American democracies, such as exists in Europe. If cultivated carefully, Jordan might join in, with more states (perhaps Kuwait) adhering later. The final result could be that most elusive of all goals: a more peaceable Middle East.

http://www.danielpipes.org/293/a-new-ax ... li-entente

Which is why he is an admirable up-to-the-minute reporter ... he addresses this in his opening statement:

Turkish policy toward Israel, historically warm and only a decade ago approaching full alliance, has cooled since Islamists took power in Ankara in 2002.

Thank you for proving he knows what he is talking about -- no one would have disputed that analysis a decade ago; but NOW things are different. Piratis' prophecy on "change of power"

"change of power" can change to any direction in any time... what if it becomes more advantegeous in favour of Turks?

Don' believe groundless "prophecies" of Piratis... he is a self-interested, so-called prophet...

[Oracle]

I conclude that no one can counter the arguments presented by Daniel Pipes because they have resorted to shooting the messenger [Washington Times].

Well done Mr Pipes; Turkey is truly a hypocrite and a tyrant of the worst kind.

Dear, please spare some time and escape from your lil' superficial world... that article is just a small part of usual "obedience game"... Don't be surprised if he soon concludes something disapointing for you... I really wouldn't like to shatter your wet dreams but you really asked for it...

A New Axis: The Emerging Turkish-Israeli Entente

by Daniel Pipes
National Interest
Winter 1997/98

The Turkish-Israeli partnership offers many advantages to the United States. Most ambitiously, it could provide the nucleus of an American-oriented regional partnership made up of democratic allies -- as opposed to the authoritarian rulers upon which Washington has relied for five decades. Eisenhower's Baghdad Pact, Nixon's "twin pillars," and Reagan's "strategic consensus" depended mostly on dubious monarchs (Iraq's weak Hashemites, Iran's bombastic shah, the egregious Saudis) and ugly authoritarians (such as the Mubarak regime in Egypt today). But the Turkish-Israeli alignment creates, for the first time, the possibility of developing an alliance of pro-American democracies, such as exists in Europe. If cultivated carefully, Jordan might join in, with more states (perhaps Kuwait) adhering later. The final result could be that most elusive of all goals: a more peaceable Middle East.

http://www.danielpipes.org/293/a-new-ax ... li-entente

Which is why he is an admirable up-to-the-minute reporter ... he addresses this in his opening statement:

Turkish policy toward Israel, historically warm and only a decade ago approaching full alliance, has cooled since Islamists took power in Ankara in 2002.

Thank you for proving he knows what he is talking about -- no one would have disputed that analysis a decade ago; but NOW things are different. Piratis' prophecy on "change of power"

"change of power" can change to any direction in any time... what if it becomes more advantegeous in favour of Turks?

Don' believe groundless "prophecies" of Piratis... he is a self-interested, so-called prophet...

Yeah ... you had decades and you've gotten more than you deserve out of that time. Now, lie back and watch what we do with our turn!

Circle of life ...

[Paphitis]

Yeah but Washington isn't prepared to do anything about it lip service

I think you can be certain that Washington will always support Israel against Turkey. Obama has Turkey under surveillance, but massive geo political changes take time, and the pendulum has reached its crest.