Acikgoz wrote:Big difference however in the ECHR decision to give right to the existing users, new point of law to be debated in GC courts, then appealed at ECJ with ECHR arguments.
This was what didn't make sense personally (non expert) that the ECHR would undermine the GC courts else it would undermine all courts in EU
Acikoz... it's very simple .... the echr is there as a final court of appeal on matters of a set of human rights, the articles in the HR Convention, a court that is, RIGHTLY for it to be effective, independent of any national governments, national institutions.
So it foolows that it will and does decide every working day that national courts have got it wrong and also in other cases that national courts have got it right.
So it doesn't "undermine" or support national courts, it looks at individual applications and decides on the individual merits or otherwise of each case before it.
In the case of the Orams the ECHR has decided after listening to the evidence that they got a fair trial in the Nicosia Court and paid no attention to any argument they may have put forward that as they are current "users" of land, the ECHR should come down on their side.
Telling you mate... and know you won't listen... Mr C is encouraged, so wouldn't want to be in the shoes of those CarpetSquatters over in Karmi and elsewhere.