Nikitas wrote:Nikephore,
When you see a former minister, Stefanos Tzoumakas, on live Greek tv during the days before the Annan plan declaring loudly:
"you have suffered a military and diplomatic defeat" and when you have seen the debate in the Greek parliament where politicians who had been ministers in the Papandreou government of the 60s, people like Mitsotakis and Papandreou (Andreas), say clearly that the policy had been unionist then but it is not so now, then it is easy to see why people become Cypriot Cypriots. They do that because Greece clearly and openly says at the highest level that it disowns them.
Nothing wrong with disowning, if it was accompanied by pressure on Turkey to disown the TCs and thereby "Cypriotise" both major communities on the island. As you know (i am being funny now) Turkey has not shown such tendencies.
Nikitas, your point is truly understandable and if I can just comment on the last paragraph.
Turkey did want to disown the TCs, that was why the 2004 push came. They did not want however for there to be a risk of a repeat of the 60s and 70s. In what the GCs want the risk is for Turkey not Greece as TCs hold a position that can be undermined if the long term Cypriotness ideal is undermined by identity with underlying ethnicities.
This is why I say GCs give no room for manoever for Turkey on Cyprus policy. If GCs lessened their grip on TCs, had any real action displayed to demonstrate willingness to share responsibilities with TCs, Turkey would naturally lessen its grip on Cyprus. Erdogan had no interest in us non-religous apathetic Turkics (sorry for the generalisation, Mr E's perspective), he's got no choice now.
In the meantime, if the Jewish lobby gets its way to remove Mr E, the likely leader is one that is very right wing on Cyprus politics.