Nikitas: negotiated, is when you discuss and work to agree.
On your numbers of what the %ages should be, going by the Prio reports, TC and GC privately owned land relative to the total privately owned land is 18%-36% and 61%-81% respectively.
The negotiated part comes in when you realise there is no movement and therefore compromises need to be discussed.
There is a trade-off between land and autonomy. So TCs get less than their current 36%, say they get 26% (or 20% - basically don't get caught up on the number), what would they want for that? or From the other side, what would GCs be willing to give in autonomy for 10%+ (not factoring in bases, buffer zone etc.) Basically both sides can get what they want and pretty much reset the relationship where political focus is substituted with economic and social attention.
I've simply watched the pro-unification players consistently lose ground since 2004. It would be healthy to allow new dialogue into the discussion as we are all going nowhere fast.
One other note, Nikitas
Preciesly how has Cyprus had a "destructive" effect on EU-Turkey relations?
The reason placed on the vetos is the freedom of trade withmember states. The opening of the Turkish ports to RoC has only been held up by the intense lobbying efforts of the RoC not to allow for direct trade with north Cyprus. Lots more can be added obviously, but please let's not throw the blame elsewhere as per usual Cypriot politics.
GR: I guess Gasman answered it, but to place a more blunt point on it. The UN resolutions are man made and as such open to political bias eg. it is illegal to kill yet in a war governments pay people to kill. Getting hung up on a point of UN res 361 is one of the reasons for the current intransigence. GCs have political leverage via 361, TCs have physical leverage via Turkey, both know the constitution they signed up for has been corrupted = only way out requires a paradigm shift.
Pyrop: I've often said, holistic settlement is so difficult to achieve, put on the table other options and perhaps piecemeal issues can be resolved. Each resolved issue means one less issue to fight over, without resolution you cannot have trust.
Humanist: You argue for the physical proximity of living together rather than the emotional proximity of living together.
Gasman: Respect for being able to view and articulate the current from a dual perspective as opposed to the stubborn as a mule age old arguments.
I don't believe much will change via the EU. What I do fear is that over time the situation remains static, and it will be even less resolvable for the satisfaction of parties in the future - if we are not already there.