Nikitas wrote:Paphiti,
We have never in the past laid down a series of options, on a sliding scale of territory proportions that we would be prepared to accept, like for instance 29-71 for federation, 25-75 for confederation and 18-82 for outright partition.
We have been so bound up in our own rhetoric and bullshit that we do not even discuss the probability of the British bases reverting to the GC constituent state and settling that question now, as part of the negotiation. If the British leave after the agreement wait and see us fighting it out all over again to share in this "new" territory and apportioning it by some formula which might even go on a 50-50 basis, even though the vast majority of villages and residents in the bases are GCs. (Ormithia, Xylofagou, Xylotympou, Livadia etc).
We must admit that we chose the worst possible people to lead these negotiations. People who know nothing about power or bargaining.
Our idiot negotiators did not even raise the point that while one constituent state under the Annan plan would be exclusively Turkish, the other would house all the remaining communities of Cyprus- the Armenians, Maronites, Latins and Roma. No one thought it worth mentioning it as a valid point in the territorial question.
Etsi kelle etsi xiourafi theli.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests