B25 wrote:Bir Wrote:
'.....Why should Iran be the sitting duck when Israel has nuclear missiles that can target every muslim city around them'
and
'....I question the above of who is really pulling the strings saying one can and one can't have nuclear weapons.'
So if you change Iran for Cyprus and Israel for Turkey in the above, you will see just how much of a F hypocrite you turks are.
Its OK for turkey to have fighter planes, tanks, 500,000 soldiers, and a shit load of other, but when poor old Cyprus tried to get some S300 Missiles (purely for defensive purposes), Turkey was shitting herself and making a song and dance about not letting the RoC have such a defensive weapon.
Typical F turks, mine, mine, and yours mine. Aholes
I am no supporter of continuing military bases in Northern Cyprus but however with no solution and the arrogance on both sides I also don't see any rush for demilitarization.
But to your S-300 missiles the arguement was that these missiles are for defensive purposes as you say in little poor old Cyprus as you say. So you really need to question what defensive purpose of little old Cyprus against an army which is the population of Cyprus importing these S-300 missiles are trying to achieve? Because it was argued that these missiles where for defensive attack against Turkey.
Before you launch your missiles the war will be over. So would it genuinely protect Cyprus? Maybe against Malta.
BTW you forgot that Cyprus has four military presence UK, UN, Turkish Army and Greek Cypriot Army protecting their own interest. So to say Cyprus defense you mean these S-300 missiles only in South Cyprus and not as a defense of Cyprus as a whole.
