Oracle wrote:You chastised me for ignoring your post
Oracle wrote:then chastised me for posting too much
CrookedRiverGuy wrote:Oracle wrote:You chastised me for ignoring your post
Wrong. I already responded to that. You misunderstood, but of course you're not interested in admitting that. Not that it is a big deal, eiither.Oracle wrote:then chastised me for posting too much
not really, just putting a little light on what you define as 'worthy pursuits'. Of course they are worthy to you, you will never realize that your noice is worthless.
--
Before you'll get the final word (you're beyond doubt the most persistant): I'm happy for you! (that was sarcasm)
Oracle wrote:CrookedRiverGuy wrote:Oracle wrote:You chastised me for ignoring your post
Wrong. I already responded to that. You misunderstood, but of course you're not interested in admitting that. Not that it is a big deal, eiither.Oracle wrote:then chastised me for posting too much
not really, just putting a little light on what you define as 'worthy pursuits'. Of course they are worthy to you, you will never realize that your noice is worthless.
--
Before you'll get the final word (you're beyond doubt the most persistant): I'm happy for you! (that was sarcasm)
My persistence (not as relentless as some - but 'ta' for the 'compliment') comes from another obsession which is to not allow the perpetuation of niggling nuggets of illogical inferences. Such as the one you make above. The "worthy pursuits" was a question I put to you. Do you consider yourself as such? .... since you did appear slighted by an unanswered post from someone who, according to you, is so prodigious in posts and noise.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest