Cyprus-Forum.com

[YFred]

Pathetic is now changing his tune, you don't like the implications for RoC now do you!

Of course it has hurt Israel on a global standing. It has now to chose between deeper isolation through continuing the blockade or ending the blockade and internally reducing its pressure on the territory that contains has Hamas as its elected leaders.

My perspective on this forum is not pro/against Israel/Palestine, I abhor the loss of lives, and the blood thirsty sickos of the likes of Paphitis and Oracle that would make political mileage off the backs of people that have been killed.

Paphitis is really deranged individual. He actually wished that Australia used her nuclear weapons and wipe out 70 million Turkish people.

These individuals are actually blood thirsty.

Australia does not have its own nuclear weapons.

We can build them in a week.

Australia has always been at the forefront in nuclear research, has the capability, and even had a policy for procurement.

This is why the F-111 was purchased. These were envisaged to be Nuclear Delivery platform.

From memory, we were offered 100 devices of our own in the 1960s.

Now, whether we have them or not, we wouldn't admit to it if we have. There are many things we don't admit. Woomera!!!!

I never said they did. Bafidi did.

Haven't the whit coats arrived yet?

You need help mate! You can smell the shit from here!

No but I have just seen the witless one on the horizon.

[Paphitis]

Oh no! You hurt my feelings.

[YFred]

Oh no! You hurt my feelings.

Re gsero jehalo eshis je feeling ayston belan.

[Simon]

Pathetic is now changing his tune, you don't like the implications for RoC now do you!

Of course it has hurt Israel on a global standing. It has now to chose between deeper isolation through continuing the blockade or ending the blockade and internally reducing its pressure on the territory that contains has Hamas as its elected leaders.

My perspective on this forum is not pro/against Israel/Palestine, I abhor the loss of lives, and the blood thirsty sickos of the likes of Paphitis and Oracle that would make political mileage off the backs of people that have been killed.

Paphitis is really deranged individual. He actually wished that Australia used her nuclear weapons and wipe out 70 million Turkish people.

These individuals are actually blood thirsty.

Australia does not have its own nuclear weapons.

We can build them in a week.

Australia has always been at the forefront in nuclear research, has the capability, and even had a policy for procurement.

This is why the F-111 was purchased. These were envisaged to be Nuclear Delivery platform.

From memory, we were offered 100 devices of our own in the 1960s.

Now, whether we have them or not, we wouldn't admit to it if we have. There are many things we don't admit. Woomera!!!!

Paphitis, there are many, many countries that have the capability and knowledge to build nuclear weapons. It is irrelevant. Even Greece had US nukes at one point. I believe Turkey still does (although I may be wrong).

Australia is a signatory to the NNPT, and their nuclear defence is covered through NATO, so they won't be building nuclear weapons anytime soon. They don't really have any need to, and to do so would be illegal.

[Bananiot]

Never before have so much rubbished pubilshed in a single thread. The events in Gaza have really shed light on the forum idiots.

[B25]

Never before have so much rubbished pubilshed in a single thread. The events in Gaza have really shed light on the forum idiots.

Only forum idiots to you, because they don't support your motherland, Turkey.

Your racist and facist behaviour towards your GCs compariots in nothing short of treason. I wonder what the penalty would be for that??

[Acikgoz]

Paphitis - you like the ambiguous, but it just makes you look scheming and cheap. Step up and be clear - are you for or against RoC supporting the sending of aid ships to Gaza to break the blockade, or do you believe that Israel is correct in stoping the ships by any means necessary.

How many times do I have to tell you!

There is no official RoC policy of support.

I also believe the Israelis have a right to board the vessels given the fact that they perceive a terrorist threat and have intercepted large shipments of
arms in the past.

I didn't ask for official RoC policy - I asked are you for or against...

Seems like you are still weasling out of the question.

Regarding the second issue of using force in international waters, how does that not then fall into the questioning perceived threats by Turkish military ships in international waters. If it is OK for Israel then surely we won't hear you criticising Turkey for militarily keeping in check perceived risks on its doorstep..... Take a viewpoint and stick to it - lest you be called a lying stinking weasle...

[wyoming cowboy]

Paphitis - you like the ambiguous, but it just makes you look scheming and cheap. Step up and be clear - are you for or against RoC supporting the sending of aid ships to Gaza to break the blockade, or do you believe that Israel is correct in stoping the ships by any means necessary.

How many times do I have to tell you!

There is no official RoC policy of support.

I also believe the Israelis have a right to board the vessels given the fact that they perceive a terrorist threat and have intercepted large shipments of
arms in the past.

I didn't ask for official RoC policy - I asked are you for or against...

Seems like you are still weasling out of the question.

Regarding the second issue of using force in international waters, how does that not then fall into the questioning perceived threats by Turkish military ships in international waters. If it is OK for Israel then surely we won't hear you criticising Turkey for militarily keeping in check perceived risks on its doorstep..... Take a viewpoint and stick to it - lest you be called a lying stinking weasle...

You moronic fool, A vast majority is against the blockade of Gaza, and numerous attempts have been made with the blessing of the ROC to break the blockade, but for some reason this time the ROC backed off, We know Turks very well, there isnt a peaceful bone in their bodies, and again we were proven correct.....Peace activist do not lunge and attack army commandoes, This was a premeditated act on behalf of Turkey to gain points in the Arab world, very obvious.....As for harrasing vessels in international waters you need to answer some questions about the country you support....How many times have t
Turkish naval vessels approached and harrased ROC ships in Cypriot territorial waters, and how many times have Turk aircraft violated the ROC airspace and Aegean airspace.???? Come on Missy lets hear your bullshit answer

[Acikgoz]

Wyoming, there you go half cocked again..... My beef is not with the RoC on this, but with those that seek political mileage out of death and destruction with no consideration at the death of 9 people.
Paphitis and Oracle - you see their posts? Have I seen you call them on it? Have I hell. If you want to be taken seriously then grow a pair.

[wyoming cowboy]

Wyoming, there you go half cocked again..... My beef is not with the RoC on this, but with those that seek political mileage out of death and destruction with no consideration at the death of 9 people.
Paphitis and Oracle - you see their posts? Have I seen you call them on it? Have I hell. If you want to be taken seriously then grow a pair.

There you go again with your bullshit answer.....answer the question of why Turkey violates ROC and Aegean sealanes and airspace and continuously harasses Greek and Roc shipping.....As for growing a pair, i can dangle them in front of you or have them banging on your chin, if you want proof.....