No Turks = no bloodshed.
And, closer to home, the opposite is being said by those in the North and that doesn't sit too well with some either:
Presence of Turkey Army = no bloodshed and longest period of 'peace' in Cyprus.
Gasman wrote:No Turks = no bloodshed.
And, closer to home, the opposite is being said by those in the North and that doesn't sit too well with some either:
Presence of Turkey Army = no bloodshed and longest period of 'peace' in Cyprus.
denizaksulu wrote:Gasman wrote:No Turks = no bloodshed.
And, closer to home, the opposite is being said by those in the North and that doesn't sit too well with some either:
Presence of Turkey Army = no bloodshed and longest period of 'peace' in Cyprus.
Oh dear, GM. You are tempting fate here. Making statements like that will ensure your endearment to a certain cıracık.Not.
YFred wrote:denizaksulu wrote:Gasman wrote:No Turks = no bloodshed.
And, closer to home, the opposite is being said by those in the North and that doesn't sit too well with some either:
Presence of Turkey Army = no bloodshed and longest period of 'peace' in Cyprus.
Oh dear, GM. You are tempting fate here. Making statements like that will ensure your endearment to a certain cıracık.Not.
A certain ciracik is having a siesta.
BirKibrisli wrote:YFred wrote:denizaksulu wrote:Gasman wrote:No Turks = no bloodshed.
And, closer to home, the opposite is being said by those in the North and that doesn't sit too well with some either:
Presence of Turkey Army = no bloodshed and longest period of 'peace' in Cyprus.
Oh dear, GM. You are tempting fate here. Making statements like that will ensure your endearment to a certain cıracık.Not.
A certain ciracik is having a siesta.
I doubt she can sleep at night let alone in the afternoon,with all that hatred and bitterness in her heart,and revenge on her mind...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests