The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Turkish IHH has terrorist links!

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Postby Acikgoz » Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:53 pm

YFred wrote:
Acikgoz wrote:Looking at the sling shots, really feels biblical - David and Goliath.

Let's summise,
Weapons: sling shots, knives

Protective bullet proof vests
Night vision goggles
Sniper gun scope - my air rifle has a better scope!

Is this what constitutions terrorist weaponary?

Grow a mind and get a soul.

What is sickening is the the way some GCs on the forum showing so much pleasure of people being killed and blaming the victims for their death.

Exactly, and Paphetic is constantly on about why a minority status is OK for TCs to accept.
True colours come to the surface - the sicko.
User avatar
Acikgoz
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:09 pm
Location: Where all activities are embargoed

Postby YFred » Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:55 pm

Acikgoz wrote:
YFred wrote:
Acikgoz wrote:Looking at the sling shots, really feels biblical - David and Goliath.

Let's summise,
Weapons: sling shots, knives

Protective bullet proof vests
Night vision goggles
Sniper gun scope - my air rifle has a better scope!

Is this what constitutions terrorist weaponary?

Grow a mind and get a soul.

What is sickening is the the way some GCs on the forum showing so much pleasure of people being killed and blaming the victims for their death.

Exactly, and Paphetic is constantly on about why a minority status is OK for TCs to accept.
True colours come to the surface - the sicko.

I can't believe that only Bananiot is challenging them. Where have all the moderate GCs gone?
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Oracle » Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:55 pm

Paphitis wrote:
Oracle wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
Paphitis wrote:Photographs of seized items from the Turkish Terrorist Ship MAVI Marmara.

http://idfspokesperson.com/2010/06/02/p ... june-2010/


Oh dear! :?

There were even NVG sniper gun scopes! This is more serious than I thought. It appears this was an elaborate MIT operation.


Paphitis ... Did any of the other flotillas have such terrorists' equipment? Or, just the Turkish infested ones?


There was not quite as much publicity about the other boats probably because they did not carry anything remotely like NVGs or bullet vests. I presume that they would have been carrying cement, which will not be allowed, but that is a very minor thing.

Cement should not raise too much suspicion.


There you go!

Conclusive proof! The difference between real peace activists and Turks!
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Acikgoz » Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:58 pm

YFred wrote:
Acikgoz wrote:
YFred wrote:
Acikgoz wrote:Looking at the sling shots, really feels biblical - David and Goliath.

Let's summise,
Weapons: sling shots, knives

Protective bullet proof vests
Night vision goggles
Sniper gun scope - my air rifle has a better scope!

Is this what constitutions terrorist weaponary?

Grow a mind and get a soul.

What is sickening is the the way some GCs on the forum showing so much pleasure of people being killed and blaming the victims for their death.

Exactly, and Paphetic is constantly on about why a minority status is OK for TCs to accept.
True colours come to the surface - the sicko.

I can't believe that only Bananiot is challenging them. Where have all the moderate GCs gone?

They are living in Cyprus.
User avatar
Acikgoz
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:09 pm
Location: Where all activities are embargoed

Postby Paphitis » Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:59 pm

Oracle wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
Paphitis wrote:Photographs of seized items from the Turkish Terrorist Ship MAVI Marmara.

http://idfspokesperson.com/2010/06/02/p ... june-2010/


Oh dear! :?

There were even NVG sniper gun scopes! This is more serious than I thought. It appears this was an elaborate MIT operation.


Paphitis ... Did any of the other flotillas have such terrorists' equipment? Or, just the Turkish infested ones?


I forgot to mention. The Irish MV Rachel Corrie is on its way to Gaza right now. Now, I honestly hope that they are not boarded so that all the aid can reach those in need in a timely fashion. However, I believe this is unlikely!

After Turkey's attention seeking, and Geopolitical posturing, I believe the IDF will intercept and board in a few hours from now. But these lovely Irish peace activists have vowed to not behave like Turks, and so I believe that there will be no violence or bloodshed.

The Rachel Corrie will then be taken to Ashdod and the aid will be unloaded. The Turks have just made things more difficult for the real genuine peace activists.
Last edited by Paphitis on Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby denizaksulu » Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:00 pm

Paphitis wrote:Military interceptions in International Waters are covered within the Geneva Conventions. There is nothing that prohibits Military Operations that intercept ships in International Waters as long as the Geneva Convention is followed.


Since there is legislation for such attacks, is there a limit to the number of civilians allowed to be killed by using dis-proportionate force?
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby Paphitis » Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:04 pm

denizaksulu wrote:
Paphitis wrote:Military interceptions in International Waters are covered within the Geneva Conventions. There is nothing that prohibits Military Operations that intercept ships in International Waters as long as the Geneva Convention is followed.


Since there is legislation for such attacks, is there a limit to the number of civilians allowed to be killed by using dis-proportionate force?


Yes, the Geneva Convention offers protection to those detained as a result of Military Operations. It is prohibited to kill any detainees.

However, the Geneva Convention does not prohibit self defense or any loss of life as a result of.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby denizaksulu » Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:07 pm

Paphitis wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Paphitis wrote:Military interceptions in International Waters are covered within the Geneva Conventions. There is nothing that prohibits Military Operations that intercept ships in International Waters as long as the Geneva Convention is followed.


Since there is legislation for such attacks, is there a limit to the number of civilians allowed to be killed by using dis-proportionate force?


Yes, the Geneva Convention offers protection to those detained as a result of Military Operations. It is prohibited to kill any detainees.

However, the Geneva Convention does not prohibit self defense or any loss of life as a result of.



Oh good. The activists are covered then, but they still died by the seafaring Azraili pirates. :roll:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby IMPOSTALIEDUS » Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:18 pm

i did say on another thread that it would not be long before the isreali propagander machine would be in full swing ,it did not take long,, all this can and has been concocted to cover up the the barbarism of the jews ,,and we all know from the past how they manipilate most goverments ,, media outlets etc paphitis has probably gone through the israeli training or brianwashing school during his army training its amazing how when they talk they all sound the same , protect israel at all cost whether they are in the right or in the wrong ...tell me paphitis you did lose you pullover when you were a boy did nt you
IMPOSTALIEDUS
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 283
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:06 pm

Postby IMPOSTALIEDUS » Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:25 pm

Paphitis wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Paphitis wrote:Military interceptions in International Waters are covered within the Geneva Conventions. There is nothing that prohibits Military Operations that intercept ships in International Waters as long as the Geneva Convention is followed.


Since there is legislation for such attacks, is there a limit to the number of civilians allowed to be killed by using dis-proportionate force?


Yes, the Geneva Convention offers protection to those detained as a result of Military Operations. It is prohibited to kill any detainees. BUT YOU CAN LEAVE THEM ON THE FLOOR FOR 4 HOURS WITHOUT MEDICAL AID TO DIE SAME THING YOU MORON THAT MAKES IT A WAR CRIME IN MY BOOK
IMPOSTALIEDUS
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 283
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:06 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests