Cyprus-Forum.com

[DT.]

Annan outlined the plan in a 138-page document[3] and gave Clerides and Denktaş one week to accept it as a basis for final negotiations. He wanted to submit his plan to twin referenda on March 30, 2004, just before the Republic of Cyprus was expected to sign an accession agreement with the EU, and he hoped that the short deadline would provoke Turkish Cypriots to support the plan since it was feared that their rejection would make the division permanent.

This sentence make no sense to me at all.

Surely, it was to provoke the Greek Cypriots to accept the AP or else the division would become permanent. Surely, by declaring the "trnc" as a state by the TCs in 1983, they were in effect declaring a permanent division.!

Did I miss something in the above quote.??

Makes as much sense as a forced migration

[halil]

Ladies and gentlemen ......... Just remind u ....... EROGLU invitation to have a dinner with CHRISTOFIAS rejected ....Rejected by Christofias !!!!!



Eroglu send a letter to Christofias inviting him for a meal ahead of the restart of the negotiations but the invitation has been rejected by Christofias. Eroglu said that he extended the invitation to the Greek Cypriot leader to create an opportunity for them to get to know each other better and to warm up the atmosphere ahead of the talks.


He added that the Greek Cypriot Leader – who rejected his invitation for a meal - put forward some different ideas.

Stating that they will get to know each other better in course of the negotiations, the President said “we care about our people’s interests while he cares about those of his own people”.

Mr Eroglu went on to say that it is one of his main duties to claim the TC People’s rights which were gained at the end of a long struggle.

‘I hope we will conclude the negotiations by the end of the year. We are ready to reach a solution which will enable the TC People to live an honorable life .

[halil]

EROĞLU would be leading the negotiations as President, his team of experts, structured at four different levels would be working to reach a solution.

In addition to his negotiating team, Eroglu announced the formation of a negotiation advisory council as well as a national council also known as a parliamentary platform.

He also said a “people’s council” made up of “civil society organizations as well as representatives of the people will be set up.

Special Representative Kudret Ozersay, Ambassador Kemal Gokeri, Assist. Prof. Hasan Gungor and Serden Hoca are among the leading names included in the new negotiating team.

Names included in the advisory body are retired Chief of Justice Taner Erginel, retired MP Ismail Bozkurt, Prof, Dr, Ata Atun, Retired Presidential undersecretary Ergun Olgun, Prof. Dr. Erol Kaymak, Ulker Fahri, Assist Prof, Dr. Murat Tuzunkan and Prof. Dr. Zeliha Khashman.

The President also said that he will be working closely with Foreign Minister Huseyin Ozgurgun throughout the talks and that Ozgurgun will be accompanying him during his foreign visits.

Meanwhile, the President’s Special Advisor Kudret Ozersay, Erol Kaymak and Serden Hoca left for Brussels today for a series of contacts with EU officials on the negotiations process, set to start next week with the chapter on property.

[YFred]

Muhtar X was not hungry. Was pork and bacon on the menu with greek coffee? Or was it Trahana followed by Imam Bayildi and finally Turkish Coffee?

[halil]

Asst. Prof. Dr. (CHAIR) Kudret Ozersay he was also at Mehmet ALI TALAT team.




Selected Publications from him:


Özersay, Kudret and Ahmet Sözen, “The Annan Plan: State Succession or Continuity?” Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 43, No.1 (January 2007), pp. 125-141.



Özersay, Kudret, “Separate Simultaneous Referenda in Cyprus: Was it a ‘Fact’ or an ‘Illusion’?” Turkish Studies, Vol. 6, No. 3, September 2005, pp. 379-399.



Gürel Ayla and Kudret Özersay, The Politics of Property in North Cyprus, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO) Report 3/2006, Nicosia, 2006.



Özersay, Kudret, Kibris Sorunu: Hukuksal Bir Inceleme, (Cyprus Problem: A Legal Analysis) ASAM, Ankara, 2002.



Kudret Özersay and Ayla Gürel, “Property and Human Rights in Cyprus: European Court of Human Rights as a platform of political struggle”, accepted to be published in the Middle Eastern Studies in 2008.



Özersay, Kudret and Ayla Gürel, “Cyprus and the Politics of Property,” Mediterranean Politics, Vol. 11, No.3 (November 2006), pp. 349-369.



Özersay, Kudret, “The Excuse of State Necessity and Its Implications on Cyprus Conflict,” Perceptions, Vol. IX, No. 4, Winter 2004-2005, pp.31-71.



Özersay, Kudret “Legal Foundations: The Validity and Scope of the 1959-1960 Cyprus Treaties,” Cyprus and International Law (Ed. Resat Arim) Foreign Policy Institute-Dis Politika Enstitüsü, Ankara, July 2002, pp. 11-60.


Here is the link for who are interesting to read some work of Kudret Özersay about The Politics of Property in Cyprus.



http://www.prio.no/upload/Cyprus%20Prop ... med%20.pdf

[halil]

OĞUZHAN HASIPOĞLU...............Lawyer......

here is the his web page:

http://hasipoglu.tripod.com/


from his web :
I am an islander born in Famagusta, Cyprus. My childhood passed in Cyprus in which one day I will be back there. Following graduation from Istanbul University Law Faculty, I made LLM at Southampton University.


Other legal areas that I am interested; Commercial law, Human rights, Intellectual Property and Internet Law. You can make use of my articles; Limitation of Shipowners Liability, Internet Law in Turkey, Cyprus Conflict from this page.

[BirKibrisli]

Annan outlined the plan in a 138-page document[3] and gave Clerides and Denktaş one week to accept it as a basis for final negotiations. He wanted to submit his plan to twin referenda on March 30, 2004, just before the Republic of Cyprus was expected to sign an accession agreement with the EU, and he hoped that the short deadline would provoke Turkish Cypriots to support the plan since it was feared that their rejection would make the division permanent.

This sentence make no sense to me at all.

Surely, it was to provoke the Greek Cypriots to accept the AP or else the division would become permanent. Surely, by declaring the "trnc" as a state by the TCs in 1983, they were in effect declaring a permanent division.! AP would have secured that position if the TCs said YES along with the GCs.!


Did I miss something in the above quote.??

That sentence doesn't make sense either ,Kikapu...
Did you get it the wrong way around,or have you too caught the history-revisionist bug...

[YFred]

Annan outlined the plan in a 138-page document[3] and gave Clerides and Denktaş one week to accept it as a basis for final negotiations. He wanted to submit his plan to twin referenda on March 30, 2004, just before the Republic of Cyprus was expected to sign an accession agreement with the EU, and he hoped that the short deadline would provoke Turkish Cypriots to support the plan since it was feared that their rejection would make the division permanent.

This sentence make no sense to me at all.

Surely, it was to provoke the Greek Cypriots to accept the AP or else the division would become permanent. Surely, by declaring the "trnc" as a state by the TCs in 1983, they were in effect declaring a permanent division.! AP would have secured that position if the TCs said YES along with the GCs.!


Did I miss something in the above quote.??

That sentence doesn't make sense either ,Kikapu...
Did you get it the wrong way around,or have you too caught the history-revisionist bug...

I think you'll find that he's had it for some time now.

[DT.]

Ladies and gentlemen ......... Just remind u ....... EROGLU invitation to have a dinner with CHRISTOFIAS rejected ....Rejected by Christofias !!!!!



Eroglu send a letter to Christofias inviting him for a meal ahead of the restart of the negotiations but the invitation has been rejected by Christofias. Eroglu said that he extended the invitation to the Greek Cypriot leader to create an opportunity for them to get to know each other better and to warm up the atmosphere ahead of the talks.


He added that the Greek Cypriot Leader – who rejected his invitation for a meal - put forward some different ideas.

Stating that they will get to know each other better in course of the negotiations, the President said “we care about our people’s interests while he cares about those of his own people”.

Mr Eroglu went on to say that it is one of his main duties to claim the TC People’s rights which were gained at the end of a long struggle.

‘I hope we will conclude the negotiations by the end of the year. We are ready to reach a solution which will enable the TC People to live an honorable life .

Christofias simply requested that the UN be present at the dinner.

[halil]

Ladies and gentlemen ......... Just remind u ....... EROGLU invitation to have a dinner with CHRISTOFIAS rejected ....Rejected by Christofias !!!!!



Eroglu send a letter to Christofias inviting him for a meal ahead of the restart of the negotiations but the invitation has been rejected by Christofias. Eroglu said that he extended the invitation to the Greek Cypriot leader to create an opportunity for them to get to know each other better and to warm up the atmosphere ahead of the talks.


He added that the Greek Cypriot Leader – who rejected his invitation for a meal - put forward some different ideas.

Stating that they will get to know each other better in course of the negotiations, the President said “we care about our people’s interests while he cares about those of his own people”.

Mr Eroglu went on to say that it is one of his main duties to claim the TC People’s rights which were gained at the end of a long struggle.

‘I hope we will conclude the negotiations by the end of the year. We are ready to reach a solution which will enable the TC People to live an honorable life .

Christofias simply requested that the UN be present at the dinner.

next time for our meeting i will request UN observers too