Get Real! wrote:Gasman wrote:GR are you saying airlines who offer bargain flights use planes that crash more often than airlines who charge more?
Dirt cheap airfare has to be covered somehow so skipping some of the “luxuries” like plane maintenance and good staff is a good start!
That's not correct mate.
There are many cheaper budget airlines around the world such as EasyJet, Virgin, Tiger Airlines, Dragon Air, and Jet Star. All these airlines heavily discount their airfares WITHOUT skipping any scheduled maintenance, fitting bogus parts or cutting corners.
Virgin was formed by Richard Branson, Tiger is owned by Singapore Airlines, Dragon Air is owned by Cathay Pacific, and Jet Star is owned by QANTAS! These airlines do not cheat, and invest heavily in safety. Pilots and Cabin crew are very experienced and meet all regulatory requirements and they are ramp checked and audited frequently. Infact, these companies meet the same standards of their parent and exceed regulatory requirements often.
The company I work for recruited 6 EasyJet Pilots last year and all met our stringent requirements. But it still is hit and miss. We also interviewed an Asiana Airlines B767 Captain who failed the simulator. He turned the wrong way whilst conducting a non visual instrument approach at Cairns at night with Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS) deactivated. We crashed into a hillside believe it or not.
I know this because I was allocated FO duties for each applicant. I was there operating the radios, gear, flaps and applying correct power settings, whilst they fly. So I was their pretend FO and it was up to them to utilise me and reduce their workload. No other input provided.
Anyway, budget airlines are able to operate and also achieve profit by cutting back on senior and middle management. So in effect, there are less people wearing suits, but there are no short cuts with Operational or Engineering Staff. Passengers also have to pay for food and drink and for excess baggage, and this is where you can get caught out and slugged heavily. Everyone is on performance based contracts. No jobs for life. Incompetence is discarded, and good performance is rewarded.
High cost airlines such as Cyprus Airways are very top heavy with senior staff, and middle management. Many don't have Aviation backgrounds and are incompetent (pilots and engineering excluded). Staff per aircraft is HIGH, and so costs are high. This is why the airline has not made a profit in a very long time. Cyprus Airways could get by with 20-30% less staff. Staff levels at QANTAS for example, are 30% lower, the staff is better quality and more productive.
Similar Airlines to Cyprus Airways are run more efficiently with better management and lower operating costs.
Helios Airlines on the other hand did take short cuts. Bogus parts were fitted! Pilots and engineers were second tier and were usually inexperienced Cypriot pilots or Eastern European Pilots who could not get jobs at more reputable airlines. There is a world of difference between Helios, and other budget airlines such as EasyJet!
So you are very wrong! Budget Airlines do not skip on "luxuries" and maintenance, which are compulsory and heavily regulated, or good staff. On the contrary, it is critical for them to employ high quality staff who are competent and productive. This is the ethos that does not exist at Cyprus Airways and why this airline is almost bankrupt and without any prospects for expansion into new markets. And this is why Cyprus Airways has a bleak future!
Profit margins in the Aviation Sector are traditionally very thin. So an airline which employs unnecessary and incompetent management staff (CyAir and Olympic) are really placing a noose around their neck!