The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


WORK TO FORM TRNC NEGOTIATING TEAM CONTINUES

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby BirKibrisli » Sat May 08, 2010 3:59 am

Pyrpolizer wrote:
YFred wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
YFred wrote:I have been talking to GCs in London since 1974. Guess what about?
I remember GCs in 74 telling me that Mehmetcik was forced to take drugs just before fighting so that they had no fear.
I wonder what the roc media was peddling at the time.

The second myth peddled by the roc at the time was Murataga, Sandallilar and Atlilar victims were GCs and the turks had put crescent star on their necks to make them look as though they were turkish. My GCs friends genuinely belived that crap.
It seems nothing has changed. You put crap in and crap is what comes out. Crap crap crap, nothing but crap.


Yes crap crap crap you tell. Because there was a chaos during those times not an RoC , and the one and only TV channel {RIK} was totally absent. All the war coverage was done by BBC.

And btw learn this: it is true the Mehmetchiks were fully loaded on hash. My own cousin shot 3 of them half sleeping on a fig tree, armed to the teeth, and looking at him like they were paralyzed. THEY DID NOT MOVE A FINGER to defend themselves.

Yeah right. Any links? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Even Mehmetcik wouldn't be brave enough to climb a fig tree. Have you ever climbed one?
So the old crap thoughts persist to this day. Not even god can help you. :wink:


Are you confusing the fig tree with a date tree? :roll:
Oh the brave Mehmetchiks :!:

Here's another TRUTH Fredie. You may chose to beleive it or discard it as you wish, I don't care.
The biggest disapointment for the GCs was not that Turkey "won" the war. We had no chance against an attacking country of 60 million anyway .

It was because we lost it to such chicken. Who did not fight no even one battle, who were sitting there idle waiting for the planes and the tanks to clear their way, who were marching in thousands hiding behind the tanks to just confront a unit of 30 GC soldiers....

And then when entering "victoriously" in totally defendless villages full of women and elderly they were doing nothing else than raping women, and killing the elderly in cold blood.

Despite of this I hope there will never be a date that your "brave" Mehmetchiks will have to deal with us again on an equal basis at least as far as weaponry is concerned.


Oh,dear...Pyro...
The GCs must be the only people on earth who believe Turkish soldiers are cowards...all I can say is,they did a good propaganda job on all of you...The image of 3 Turkish soldiers paralysed with fear or drugs in a fig tree is just beyond belief...Your cousin must've been pulling your leg...
I would stop talking like this if I were you,it might give GR some new ideas regarding his upcoming war with Turkey... :wink: :)
User avatar
BirKibrisli
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Australia

Postby repulsewarrior » Sat May 08, 2010 4:36 am

...the Turkish Army has a serious problem with discipline, i remember Solomou. and it is not the ethics of shooting someone shimming up a flag pole, but what happened after he was shot, and how that came to be the only apparent solution. denial is a threat to the Turkish State, yet an incident as blatant as this does not move the powers within this organisation to do more than to dismiss the consequence of soldiers out of control.

i would be afraid of them, i am afraid of them, as their leadership skews.
User avatar
repulsewarrior
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 14254
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 2:13 am
Location: homeless in Canada

Postby Pyrpolizer » Sat May 08, 2010 10:31 am

BirKibrisli wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
YFred wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
YFred wrote:I have been talking to GCs in London since 1974. Guess what about?
I remember GCs in 74 telling me that Mehmetcik was forced to take drugs just before fighting so that they had no fear.
I wonder what the roc media was peddling at the time.

The second myth peddled by the roc at the time was Murataga, Sandallilar and Atlilar victims were GCs and the turks had put crescent star on their necks to make them look as though they were turkish. My GCs friends genuinely belived that crap.
It seems nothing has changed. You put crap in and crap is what comes out. Crap crap crap, nothing but crap.


Yes crap crap crap you tell. Because there was a chaos during those times not an RoC , and the one and only TV channel {RIK} was totally absent. All the war coverage was done by BBC.

And btw learn this: it is true the Mehmetchiks were fully loaded on hash. My own cousin shot 3 of them half sleeping on a fig tree, armed to the teeth, and looking at him like they were paralyzed. THEY DID NOT MOVE A FINGER to defend themselves.

Yeah right. Any links? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Even Mehmetcik wouldn't be brave enough to climb a fig tree. Have you ever climbed one?
So the old crap thoughts persist to this day. Not even god can help you. :wink:


Are you confusing the fig tree with a date tree? :roll:
Oh the brave Mehmetchiks :!:

Here's another TRUTH Fredie. You may chose to beleive it or discard it as you wish, I don't care.
The biggest disapointment for the GCs was not that Turkey "won" the war. We had no chance against an attacking country of 60 million anyway .

It was because we lost it to such chicken. Who did not fight no even one battle, who were sitting there idle waiting for the planes and the tanks to clear their way, who were marching in thousands hiding behind the tanks to just confront a unit of 30 GC soldiers....

And then when entering "victoriously" in totally defendless villages full of women and elderly they were doing nothing else than raping women, and killing the elderly in cold blood.

Despite of this I hope there will never be a date that your "brave" Mehmetchiks will have to deal with us again on an equal basis at least as far as weaponry is concerned.


Oh,dear...Pyro...
The GCs must be the only people on earth who believe Turkish soldiers are cowards...all I can say is,they did a good propaganda job on all of you...The image of 3 Turkish soldiers paralysed with fear or drugs in a fig tree is just beyond belief...Your cousin must've been pulling your leg...
I would stop talking like this if I were you,it might give GR some new ideas regarding his upcoming war with Turkey... :wink: :)


And you are the only ones who think they are brave and noble. :wink:
Why do you question my cousins sincerity? This is not the only thing he told me about his experiences at war.

There was no propaganda going on in 1974, I said before there was chaos, not a state to produce propaganda. So many GC soldiers witnessed the same thing, that Mehmetchiks were on hash at least a good percentage of them, some of the Mehmetchiks died, guess what they found in their pockets?

Here's another truth Bir:Lot's of those Eokas who were attacking innocent TC in their villages in the 60s were fully drunk. Do you doubt that too?
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby YFred » Sat May 08, 2010 10:31 am

Pyrpolizer wrote:
YFred wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
YFred wrote:I have been talking to GCs in London since 1974. Guess what about?
I remember GCs in 74 telling me that Mehmetcik was forced to take drugs just before fighting so that they had no fear.
I wonder what the roc media was peddling at the time.

The second myth peddled by the roc at the time was Murataga, Sandallilar and Atlilar victims were GCs and the turks had put crescent star on their necks to make them look as though they were turkish. My GCs friends genuinely belived that crap.
It seems nothing has changed. You put crap in and crap is what comes out. Crap crap crap, nothing but crap.


Yes crap crap crap you tell. Because there was a chaos during those times not an RoC , and the one and only TV channel {RIK} was totally absent. All the war coverage was done by BBC.

And btw learn this: it is true the Mehmetchiks were fully loaded on hash. My own cousin shot 3 of them half sleeping on a fig tree, armed to the teeth, and looking at him like they were paralyzed. THEY DID NOT MOVE A FINGER to defend themselves.

Yeah right. Any links? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Even Mehmetcik wouldn't be brave enough to climb a fig tree. Have you ever climbed one?
So the old crap thoughts persist to this day. Not even god can help you. :wink:


Are you confusing the fig tree with a date tree? :roll:
Oh the brave Mehmetchiks :!:

Here's another TRUTH Fredie. You may chose to beleive it or discard it as you wish, I don't care.
The biggest disapointment for the GCs was not that Turkey "won" the war. We had no chance against an attacking country of 60 million anyway .

It was because we lost it to such chicken. Who did not fight no even one battle, who were sitting there idle waiting for the planes and the tanks to clear their way, who were marching in thousands hiding behind the tanks to just confront a unit of 30 GC soldiers....

And then when entering "victoriously" in totally defendless villages full of women and elderly they were doing nothing else than raping women, and killing the elderly in cold blood.

Despite of this I hope there will never be a date that your "brave" Mehmetchiks will have to deal with us again on an equal basis at least as far as weaponry is concerned.

Like I said you have no idea why nobody would climb a fig tree. In all my years in Cyprus, I have never seen anybody climb one for a good reason. You would itch to death you silly sod. What's a date tree got to do with it?
As to the brave mehemtcik. Was there tanks capable of climbing the mountain so they can hide behind. I think not. They climbed that mountain while they were being shot at from above. Ask any soldier if the position they decided to land was a good choice? You will get your answer.
What you seem to be oblivious about is the overall plan. It went very well for the yanks, they got exactly what they wanted and the fools in eoka were fodder to facilitate the conclusion of that plan. You can cover yourself in all the flags you like. But in life there is nothing like a fool who not makes mistakes but does not even see them in hindsight. These are kinds of fools that my American friends like, cause they are as thick as shit.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Pyrpolizer » Sat May 08, 2010 10:47 am

YFred wrote:Like I said you have no idea why nobody would climb a fig tree. In all my years in Cyprus, I have never seen anybody climb one for a good reason. You would itch to death you silly sod. What's a date tree got to do with it?
As to the brave mehemtcik. Was there tanks capable of climbing the mountain so they can hide behind. I think not. They climbed that mountain while they were being shot at from above. Ask any soldier if the position they decided to land was a good choice? You will get your answer.
What you seem to be oblivious about is the overall plan. It went very well for the yanks, they got exactly what they wanted and the fools in eoka were fodder to facilitate the conclusion of that plan. You can cover yourself in all the flags you like. But in life there is nothing like a fool who not makes mistakes but does not even see them in hindsight. These are kinds of fools that my American friends like, cause they are as thick as shit.


What a nonsense!!A fig tree has smooth and strong branches.It is trimmed to form a cup in the middle so that leaves get as much sun as possible. It makes it ideal to climb because the main branch is rather short distance from ground and he other branches are strong enough to carry the weight. I climbed hundreds of them when I was a child, it it never occurred to me to have itching.You have to rub yourself too much against the leaves to have that. Like I said the center of a fig tree is totally clear, with strong branches, very nice hideout if you need one. But what could a pseudo-peasant like you living in London know? :P :P :P

As for the rest of your post it makes no sense, try re-writting it. :P
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby YFred » Sat May 08, 2010 10:50 am

Pyrpolizer wrote:
YFred wrote:

Like I said you have no idea why nobody would climb a fig tree. In all my years in Cyprus, I have never seen anybody climb one for a good reason. You would itch to death you silly sod. What's a date tree got to do with it?
As to the brave mehemtcik. Was there tanks capable of climbing the mountain so they can hide behind. I think not. They climbed that mountain while they were being shot at from above. Ask any soldier if the position they decided to land was a good choice? You will get your answer.
What you seem to be oblivious about is the overall plan. It went very well for the yanks, they got exactly what they wanted and the fools in eoka were fodder to facilitate the conclusion of that plan. You can cover yourself in all the flags you like. But in life there is nothing like a fool who not makes mistakes but does not even see them in hindsight. These are kinds of fools that my American friends like, cause they are as thick as shit.


What a nonsense!!A fig tree has smooth and strong branches.It is trimmed to form a cup in the middle so that leaves get as much sun as possible. It makes it ideal to climb because the main branch is rather short distance from ground and he other branches are strong enough to carry the weight. I climbed hundreds of them when I was a child, it it never occurred to me to have itching.You have to rub yourself too much against the leaves to have that. Like I said the center of a fig tree is totally clear, with strong branches, very nice hideout if you need one. But what could a pseudo-peasant like you living in London know? :P :P :P

As for the rest of your post it makes no sense, try re-writting it. :P


Of course you GCs are much more brave than we are. I forget your skins are thicker, darker and tougher than an avearge TC skin. Yeah right.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Pyrpolizer » Sat May 08, 2010 11:07 am

YFred wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
YFred wrote:

Like I said you have no idea why nobody would climb a fig tree. In all my years in Cyprus, I have never seen anybody climb one for a good reason. You would itch to death you silly sod. What's a date tree got to do with it?
As to the brave mehemtcik. Was there tanks capable of climbing the mountain so they can hide behind. I think not. They climbed that mountain while they were being shot at from above. Ask any soldier if the position they decided to land was a good choice? You will get your answer.
What you seem to be oblivious about is the overall plan. It went very well for the yanks, they got exactly what they wanted and the fools in eoka were fodder to facilitate the conclusion of that plan. You can cover yourself in all the flags you like. But in life there is nothing like a fool who not makes mistakes but does not even see them in hindsight. These are kinds of fools that my American friends like, cause they are as thick as shit.


What a nonsense!!A fig tree has smooth and strong branches.It is trimmed to form a cup in the middle so that leaves get as much sun as possible. It makes it ideal to climb because the main branch is rather short distance from ground and he other branches are strong enough to carry the weight. I climbed hundreds of them when I was a child, it it never occurred to me to have itching.You have to rub yourself too much against the leaves to have that. Like I said the center of a fig tree is totally clear, with strong branches, very nice hideout if you need one. But what could a pseudo-peasant like you living in London know? :P :P :P

As for the rest of your post it makes no sense, try re-writting it. :P


Of course you GCs are much more brave than we are. I forget your skins are thicker, darker and tougher than an avearge TC skin. Yeah right.


Reh idiot you don't need to climb a fig tree to collect the fruit. You collect them very easily by hand using a small or no ladder. That's why you probably saw no one climbing it. But I guarantee you nothing will happen to you if you climb. I used to climb one to get on the roof of my own house and hunt sparrows on neighbouring trees when i was a child. And many other just for the fun of it. A childhood friend of mine could even climb cypress trees. He would do it by running quickly to it and get up as fast as possible. He could climb about 6 meters straight up. Yep that how how played as children Fredie, what were you babys doing doing in Lurucina, deflowering each other? :P :P :P :P
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby YFred » Sat May 08, 2010 11:16 am

Pyrpolizer wrote:
YFred wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
YFred wrote:

Like I said you have no idea why nobody would climb a fig tree. In all my years in Cyprus, I have never seen anybody climb one for a good reason. You would itch to death you silly sod. What's a date tree got to do with it?
As to the brave mehemtcik. Was there tanks capable of climbing the mountain so they can hide behind. I think not. They climbed that mountain while they were being shot at from above. Ask any soldier if the position they decided to land was a good choice? You will get your answer.
What you seem to be oblivious about is the overall plan. It went very well for the yanks, they got exactly what they wanted and the fools in eoka were fodder to facilitate the conclusion of that plan. You can cover yourself in all the flags you like. But in life there is nothing like a fool who not makes mistakes but does not even see them in hindsight. These are kinds of fools that my American friends like, cause they are as thick as shit.


What a nonsense!!A fig tree has smooth and strong branches.It is trimmed to form a cup in the middle so that leaves get as much sun as possible. It makes it ideal to climb because the main branch is rather short distance from ground and he other branches are strong enough to carry the weight. I climbed hundreds of them when I was a child, it it never occurred to me to have itching.You have to rub yourself too much against the leaves to have that. Like I said the center of a fig tree is totally clear, with strong branches, very nice hideout if you need one. But what could a pseudo-peasant like you living in London know? :P :P :P

As for the rest of your post it makes no sense, try re-writting it. :P


Of course you GCs are much more brave than we are. I forget your skins are thicker, darker and tougher than an avearge TC skin. Yeah right.


Reh idiot you don't need to climb a fig tree to collect the fruit. You collect them very easily by hand using a small or no ladder. That's why you probably saw no one climbing it. But I guarantee you nothing will happen to you if you climb. I used to climb one to get on the roof of my own house and hunt sparrows on neighbouring trees when i was a child. And many other just for the fun of it. A childhood friend of mine could even climb cypress trees. He would do it by running quickly to it and get up as fast as possible. He could climb about 6 meters straight up. Yep that how how played as children Fredie, what were you babys doing doing in Lurucina, deflowering each other? :P :P :P :P

Typical bloody Greek, you have gay sex in the brain. Off to the analyst dear boy. You'll find eventually it will help. Don’t expect miracles though, what the bible says is just not true. Ask Oracle, she knows all about about it. She has an ology in Ornithology on account that she is a bird. As a matter of interst do you know why women are refered to as birds? it's because they pick up worms.

As to the fig trees you are right. The branches hang downwards and you can normally reach the figs without climbing and the ones at the top are normally left to the birds and I mean the feathered kind, what?
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Pyrpolizer » Sat May 08, 2010 11:29 am

YFred wrote:Typical bloody Greek, you have gay sex in the brain. Off to the analyst dear boy. You'll find eventually it will help. Don’t expect miracles though, what the bible says is just not true. Ask Oracle, she knows all about about it. She has an ology in Ornithology on account that she is a bird. As a matter of interst do you know why women are refered to as birds? it's because they pick up worms.

As to the fig trees you are right. The branches hang downwards and you can normally reach the figs without climbing and the ones at the top are normally left to the birds and I mean the feathered kind, what?


Hmmm let me see....

Who addresses EVERYBODY "a baby" in this forum?
Who adreeses averybody as "pustoui" in this forum?
Who has nothing else to talk about in his perverted so called Lurucina language other than arses, and feces, in this forum?
Who thinks all Greeks do Greek style sex, as if all French do French style sex in this forum?
Who said he had a deflowering expert in his village, specialized on gays?




























































































The one and only Fredie Queena. :P :P :P :P
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby YFred » Sat May 08, 2010 11:36 am

Pyrpolizer wrote:
YFred wrote:Typical bloody Greek, you have gay sex in the brain. Off to the analyst dear boy. You'll find eventually it will help. Don’t expect miracles though, what the bible says is just not true. Ask Oracle, she knows all about about it. She has an ology in Ornithology on account that she is a bird. As a matter of interst do you know why women are refered to as birds? it's because they pick up worms.

As to the fig trees you are right. The branches hang downwards and you can normally reach the figs without climbing and the ones at the top are normally left to the birds and I mean the feathered kind, what?


Hmmm let me see....

Who addresses EVERYBODY "a baby" in this forum?
Who adreeses averybody as "pustoui" in this forum?
Who has nothing else to talk about in his perverted so called Lurucina language other than arses, and feces, in this forum?
Who thinks all Greeks do Greek style sex, as if all French do French style sex in this forum?
Who said he had a deflowering expert in his village, specialized on gays?

The one and only Fredie Queena.P :P :P :P

What? you mean to say, Greeks don't like Greek Style and French the French style. Then how an earth did the names start then Pyrouimmu baby.
You see to me everybod who is young then me is a babi.

Keep on taking the tablest, they are having an effect. I can sense the improvement in your posts Pyro Baby, what?
Oh shit, bastardo is back. I am off.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests