Piratis wrote:The video I posted talks about 100 victims, and this is supported by the evidence.
In addition to the video here is a good article to start:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/artic ... -2,00.html
And here are some evidence from the official British records about the murders and about how broadcasts from Turkey were inciting the TCs to start the inter-communal conflict:
http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/comm ... 10_HOC_103
http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/comm ... 617_HOC_12
And here is how the TCs started to lie about their own casualties from the very beginning of the conflict they started. If we go with what Kucuk was saying, in the late 50s there were 1000s of casualties, not just 100.
http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/comm ... 24_HOC_223
And the above is just from June 1958.
If you want next week I will post a lot more facts and evidence. But since you are asking for me to go in this trouble, I would also like to see independent evidence for the casualties of TCs during the conflict, particularly for the period 1968 until July 1974. It is obvious to me that in those years there was much less conflict and casualties than in 1958. And still you want to include those years in the inter-communal conflict while you want to exclude 1958 when you started the conflict.
It is time for the Turkish propagandists to stop lying that the inter-communal conflict started in 1963 and that there was no problem until then. The conflict started in the late 50s by the TCs themselves because conflict and division is what served their aim of partition.
Thank you P. So far I counted 6 GCs killed plus those at Geunyeli =14.
I appreciate that one is too many but we are still far from your 'exagerated' 200. I also accept that the numbers killed on the TC side are slightly exagerated. Where are the other 180 or so GCs killed?
As for the incitement that goes for both sides.