Cyprus-Forum.com

[Piratis]

So Halil, north Cyprus is yours, and what you left in the free areas of Cyprus is also yours? Didn't you decide that everything in the southern part of Cyprus is not yours anymore when you choose that you wanted partition in the 1950s?

On the other hand we never wanted partition. We were FORCED out of our homes in the north part of Cyprus when in 1974 you completed what you started in 1958 and you ethnically cleansed us from our homeland.

[boomerang]

further more this idiot unwilling to understand and expected, the gcs should have been good slaves and kept their dwellings in mink condition and vacant...while with their fake tiltle deeds should be free in selling other peoples land to foreigners...holding the gcs to ransom with their land grab...

after all the land grab, declaring the north as their country they also want a share of any oil found in the south...

his mentality is best explained, what is mine is mine and what is yours is also mine...

you got 37% of the country, you declared a country, unwilling to unite under a true federation, well fuck off then you and your 1 million newly aquired assimilated tcs...

[observer]

you got 37% of the country, you declared a country, unwilling to unite under a true federation, well fuck off then you and your 1 million newly aquired assimilated tcs...

How quickly you forget 2004 when 65% of the TCs voted for a federation that had the support of the EU, the UN and most independent observers. You may not have liked the shape of the Federation, but it was GCs who voted it away.

You will have your idea of what is a "true federation" is. I doubt if it's mine, and I doubt if such a large majority of TCs could now be obtained for the same plan.

[boomerang]

you got 37% of the country, you declared a country, unwilling to unite under a true federation, well fuck off then you and your 1 million newly aquired assimilated tcs...

How quickly you forget 2004 when 65% of the TCs voted for a federation that had the support of the EU, the UN and most independent observers. You may not have liked the shape of the Federation, but it was GCs who voted it away.

You will have your idea of what is a "true federation" is. I doubt if it's mine, and I doubt if such a large majority of TCs could now be obtained for the same plan.

you forgot that if the shoe was on the other foot you would have done the same in 2004...so that is a non starter, dead and buried...

other wise if you would, now you would have gone along with a "true federation" like US, OZ and other countries....

the 2004 plan was not federation...you would do well to look at the difference between federation and confederation and which one the annan plan was modelled after...

expediency for the hell of it is a non starter...you better keep this in mind when refering to the failed plan...

[observer]

you got 37% of the country, you declared a country, unwilling to unite under a true federation, well fuck off then you and your 1 million newly aquired assimilated tcs...

How quickly you forget 2004 when 65% of the TCs voted for a federation that had the support of the EU, the UN and most independent observers. You may not have liked the shape of the Federation, but it was GCs who voted it away.

You will have your idea of what is a "true federation" is. I doubt if it's mine, and I doubt if such a large majority of TCs could now be obtained for the same plan.

you forgot that if the shoe was on the other foot you would have done the same in 2004...so that is a non starter, dead and buried...

other wise if you would, now you would have gone along with a "true federation" like US, OZ and other countries....

the 2004 plan was not federation...you would do well to look at the difference between federation and confederation and which one the annan plan was modelled after...

expediency for the hell of it is a non starter...you better keep this in mind when refering to the failed plan...

I think all this really means is "I decide what a federation is".

[boomerang]

you got 37% of the country, you declared a country, unwilling to unite under a true federation, well fuck off then you and your 1 million newly aquired assimilated tcs...

How quickly you forget 2004 when 65% of the TCs voted for a federation that had the support of the EU, the UN and most independent observers. You may not have liked the shape of the Federation, but it was GCs who voted it away.

You will have your idea of what is a "true federation" is. I doubt if it's mine, and I doubt if such a large majority of TCs could now be obtained for the same plan.

you forgot that if the shoe was on the other foot you would have done the same in 2004...so that is a non starter, dead and buried...

other wise if you would, now you would have gone along with a "true federation" like US, OZ and other countries....

the 2004 plan was not federation...you would do well to look at the difference between federation and confederation and which one the annan plan was modelled after...

expediency for the hell of it is a non starter...you better keep this in mind when refering to the failed plan...

I think all this really means is "I decide what a federation is".

no this means you look up the difference so the least you could do is get a handle on it when posting without looking around for comparissons...

[YFred]

further more this idiot unwilling to understand and expected, the gcs should have been good slaves and kept their dwellings in mink condition and vacant...while with their fake tiltle deeds should be free in selling other peoples land to foreigners...holding the gcs to ransom with their land grab...

after all the land grab, declaring the north as their country they also want a share of any oil found in the south...

his mentality is best explained, what is mine is mine and what is yours is also mine...

you got 37% of the country, you declared a country, unwilling to unite under a true federation, well fuck off then you and your 1 million newly aquired assimilated tcs...

Bumbo, you can have all the oil that you are able to get out of the ground.
How is that. I am kind or am I kind. I mean 100%.
But then again 100% of nothing is still nothing.
Asshole.

[observer]

Titles are titles and mean tit all. How democratic is the Democratic People's Republic of North Korea?

[boomerang]

further more this idiot unwilling to understand and expected, the gcs should have been good slaves and kept their dwellings in mink condition and vacant...while with their fake tiltle deeds should be free in selling other peoples land to foreigners...holding the gcs to ransom with their land grab...

after all the land grab, declaring the north as their country they also want a share of any oil found in the south...

his mentality is best explained, what is mine is mine and what is yours is also mine...

you got 37% of the country, you declared a country, unwilling to unite under a true federation, well fuck off then you and your 1 million newly aquired assimilated tcs...

Bumbo, you can have all the oil that you are able to get out of the ground.
How is that. I am kind or am I kind. I mean 100%.
But then again 100% of nothing is still nothing.
Asshole.

you need a quick visit to the chemist to replenish your stupidity tablets el pronto... what?...

[boomerang]

Titles are titles and mean tit all. How democratic is the Democratic People's Republic of North Korea?

are you comparing your self to north korea?...they are backwards...