Michael Coumas wrote:erolz – Point taken but I assure you the poor victim would have been in no doubt that he was being challenged to halt.
but challenged by whom? we do not know why he ran and we never may.
Michael Coumas wrote:May I also add that they would not have been waving guns about; they would have been drawn from their holsters at the last minute.
The full details of what happened are not clear and currently under investigation. However there is at least one eye witness report that claims one of the officers had his gun out whilst chasing the man.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4706913.stmMichael Coumas wrote:The victim obviously had something to hide hence his efforts to escape.
I do not see how you come to such a definate decision to be honest. Maybe he just paniced? (and who of us knows how we would react in a similar situation?) Maybe he was dating a girl who had a previously violent partner and he assumed the men chasing him and shouting were connected to that and had come to beat the crap out of him? We just do not know why he ran - but to me to say that his running is proof of him hiding something is not supportable. It might be and it might not. What he was without a doubt not hiding was a suicide bomb.
Michael Coumas wrote:Our sympathies must go to his family and friends
And to me the sincerest way for the authorites to show their sympathy is to be seen to do what they can to enusre that such a tradgedy does not befall another innocent person and thier family. However it would seem that exactly the reverse has so far been the reponse, with warnings that other innocents may indeed have to die at the hands of the police. Even if the policy is to remain there is in my view no need to make public statments like these.