Bananiot wrote:Of course there were plans for the partition of the island DT. These were prepared by the TC nationalists in order to confront our plans for enosis. If you were a TC you would probably support them too. In 1955 we started an armed struggle against the British Empire without taking into account the concerns and fears of 18% of the population of Cyprus and at the same time, Grivas asked the Greek Cypriot left to remain neutral (another 40% down the hole). The struggle was doomed from day one and when things got sour, Grivas and his thugs started murdering leftists while Denktash and his thugs started murdering the leftist elite of the TC community. Perhaps we were lucky to get what we got in 1959, as Papadopoulos realised and admitted 48 years later.
The people who stained their hands with innocent blood are known, within both communities. For example, some idiots within the GC community and this forum, who urge Eroglu to win the elections, forget that Eroglu was instrumental within the inner circles of TMT. Talat, on the other hand and his TCP party, have not touched one single GC and have even saved GC's during 1974 from the worse. Members of the TC left have been executed for their believes by the TC nationalists that Eroglu and Denktash foster and yet, DT, you are still wondering about the schemers that wanted the undoing of Cyprus.
The desire of the Cypriot people to live in a free Greek state along with all other Greeks dates back to 1821. When the British took over Cyprus in 1878, enosis was one of the first things we asked from them to allow us, and as you admitted enosis was our right.
So stop confusing the cause of enosis with the actions of Grivas. Yes, Grivas was anti-communist and he murdered leftists, something which had nothing to do with the cause of enosis, a cause which was supported by the majority of the leftists as well, including AKEL. But what is certain is that Grivas did not target the TC minority. It is the TMT which was formed to target the GCs and initiate the inter-communal conflict.
Furthermore, I am not sure if a leftist or even neutral leader of EOKA (or political movement) could bring better results. Do you think that the Americans would allow for communists to take over Cyprus? Do you think the Americans would prefer a fully independent and communist Cyprus, than a Cyprus controlled by the right or being part of a NATO Greece? Here is how Americans viewed communism in the 1950s:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism Murdering of leftists is certainly a criminal action, but leaving the communists officially out of the struggle was a smart move in my opinion considering the environment.
I accept that the TCs had some fears about enosis, fears which were exaggerated by the Imperialists and used as a the "stick" to push the TCs to play their game.
But you also forget the "carrot" that the imperialists offered to the TCs: To upgrade their small minority to a much higher status with powers and privileges they did not deserve. Do you think that if we fought for independence instead of Enosis, that the TCs would ignore this "carrot" that would in any case be offered to them, and instead of collaborating with the imperialists and gain the powers and privileges offered to them, they would choose instead to be just equal Cypriots in totally free and independent Cyprus? I think not, and this is something proven by the demands of TCs today when enosis is out of the question.