DTA wrote:Kickapoo what are you talking about?
Come, come "DTA", lets not behave like children. You are man enough and old enough to appreciate when you are gotten, you are gotten. I wish you kept your original nick by the way. It most definitely suited you better, because you are much smarter than the disguised DTA you are playing. You are deliberately lowering your intelligence level just to play the role of DTA. Why.??.
DTA wrote:I thought you were 99% certain that I was soyer?
I've already explained why. There was a reason as to why I said 99% and not 100% . Now I'm saying 100%, that you are not Soyer, because I know 100% that you are another nick from the past.
DTA wrote:Now you are saying that you were not telling the truth, don't you berrate people for not telling the truth?
What's the lie. I said you were 99% Soyer. So you are not, big deal. Now I'm saying you are 100% someone other than Soyer. In order to get from making you believe you were Soyer to someone else, well, certain information had to be enhanced for it to work. As for not telling the truth, well, as the saying goes,
"you can't make an omelette without breaking few eggs first". But compare that to you, you have been breaking dozens of eggs every minute to disguise yourself as DTA, there's no comparison, so lets not get too carried away about not telling the truth. I said you were Soyer 99% one day, and the next day, I said you were not Soyer 100%. That's all!
DTA wrote:So if I am not soyer who am I?
Why do you want to be "Soyer". The guy was a loser.!
I'm not going to let it out at this moment in time, if ever. It's really not my place to expose you like that to the CF. If you want to remain as "DTA", then so be it. Right now "DTA" does not have the best image here on the forum given your insults on forum member's family members and all the sadistic pervasive sexual content that went with it. You will have the image of the "Scumbag and a Cunt" for a long time for doing what you did, even if you were to make a formal apology to the CF members, which you feel you don't need to, therefore, that image and reputation is also likely to remain for a while.
DTA wrote:I pick the number 4 is that ok or would you prefer another number?
No, 4 is a good number. At least you accept the fact that you are not a new member as you wanted all of us to believe when you first signed as DTA and the fact that you want to find out if I'm correct with the letter that belongs to NO.4, has at least puts that question to bed.
OK, the letter that belong to the number 4 slot in your old nick is, "O".
I don't expect for you to acknowledge this to be correct, but if you were man enough, you should.!
Even if you don't, it doesn't matter, because you will know that I know, and that's enough for me to have gone beyond your disguised and found you.! You will at least have to admit that my "con game" worked for the second time. Like I said, if you don't want to come out, that's fine. I personally would like for you to get rid of DTA, and return as you were before. You will have far more respect than DTA will given the recent image problem associated with that nick.
Anyway, I did what I set out to do and got the results I wanted, and you can also decide to do as you please.!