The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


End of the road for the Orams

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby YFred » Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:23 pm

DTA wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
YFred wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:they keep pushing.. they should of never trusted thieves to buy stolen land from them

Palio, how can you accuse a TC who sold his land to the orams as being thief when the ROC hold on to his land in the south.


Tell us YFred. How did the GC land in the north all of a sudden became a TC land, where the TC was entitle to sell it to the Orams as if it was his land, regardless what the situation of his land is in the south. Just tell us how was the TC able to become the legal owner of the GC land that he sold to the Orams.? Just because the RoC has become the guardian of the TCs properties in the south so that they can't be exploited, how does that make the TC owner of the GC's property he sold to the Orams.On what legal basis did the TC became the legal owner of the GC property sold to the Orams. As far as the RoC is concerned, the TC who sold "his" GC property to the Orams, is still the legal owner of his own land in the south.


DTA wrote:Really can he sell it then? No? why not if he is the legal owner?


That has a lot to do with the political situation and not because he is NOT the legal owner. But you did not answer my question, which was, what made the TC a legal owner of the GC's land he sold to the Orams. If you don't know the answer, then shut the hell up and stop diverting attention from what we are talking about.

DTA wrote:you are so bias, looks like a few new threads need to be started to discuss your idiotic myopic flawed views.


Only idiots like you will try and open more threads on me. Where did the last ones get you idiots................nowhere, that's because you don't have an argument, just cheap accusations. Very common for idiots who can't defend their positions.! :lol: :lol: :lol:

So let me ask you, DTA, since you want to lead the "idiots parade" as the Grand Marshall in challenging me with your idiotic post above. How is my post "biased" just because I asked the other idiot, YFred to explain as to what legal rights did the TC had selling "his" GC land to the Orams.? I don't want to hear nonsense bullshit from you for excuses, because excuses are like assholes, that everyone has one. Answer the question if you can, and if you can't, then don't make yourself to be any more idiot than what you already are, just to try to prove something that you can't. It's best you keep your mouth shut. That way you can get away from anyone knowing that you are an idiot.!


Listen dick head, I did not start the other threads about you, but the overwhelming feeling in them was that you are bias the fact that B25 came to your aid is just sooooooo funny. Does that not tell you anything>>>> you idiot

the answer to your question is this:

The TRNC who he is a member of, gave him the right to do so, of course the TRNC has no legal standing apart from with Turkey.

Now dick head, answer my question:

what legal reason is there that says that he cant sell the land that he has legal ownership of in the ROC?

your answer saying it is political is as pathetic as most of your arguements in fact it is as pathetic as you are.

Your wife cheat on you much.... I am betting she did/does

She believed in the theory of "If you can't fuck a friend, who can you fuck". I dread to think what there life was like and who wore the trousers in that household.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Kikapu » Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:33 pm

YFred wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
YFred wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:they keep pushing.. they should of never trusted thieves to buy stolen land from them

Palio, how can you accuse a TC who sold his land to the orams as being thief when the ROC hold on to his land in the south.


Tell us YFred. How did the GC land in the north all of a sudden became a TC land, where the TC was entitle to sell it to the Orams as if it was his land, regardless what the situation of his land is in the south. Just tell us how was the TC able to become the legal owner of the GC land that he sold to the Orams.? Just because the RoC has become the guardian of the TCs properties in the south so that they can't be exploited, how does that make the TC owner of the GC's property he sold to the Orams.On what legal basis did the TC became the legal owner of the GC property sold to the Orams. As far as the RoC is concerned, the TC who sold "his" GC property to the Orams, is still the legal owner of his own land in the south.

After 35 years of waiting for the roc, that's a big yes. But if it makes you feel better view it as a lease arrangement. It's not that different. Hava parasi. :lol: :lol: :lol:


So the fact that Denktash kept the north as an "open prison" for all those years because as far as he was concerned, the Cyprus Problem was over in 1974, has no responsibility for the ongoing non-settlement.!
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby DTA » Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:38 pm

Kikapu wrote:
YFred wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
YFred wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:they keep pushing.. they should of never trusted thieves to buy stolen land from them

Palio, how can you accuse a TC who sold his land to the orams as being thief when the ROC hold on to his land in the south.


Tell us YFred. How did the GC land in the north all of a sudden became a TC land, where the TC was entitle to sell it to the Orams as if it was his land, regardless what the situation of his land is in the south. Just tell us how was the TC able to become the legal owner of the GC land that he sold to the Orams.? Just because the RoC has become the guardian of the TCs properties in the south so that they can't be exploited, how does that make the TC owner of the GC's property he sold to the Orams.On what legal basis did the TC became the legal owner of the GC property sold to the Orams. As far as the RoC is concerned, the TC who sold "his" GC property to the Orams, is still the legal owner of his own land in the south.

After 35 years of waiting for the roc, that's a big yes. But if it makes you feel better view it as a lease arrangement. It's not that different. Hava parasi. :lol: :lol: :lol:


So the fact that Denktash kept the north as an "open prison" for all those years because as far as he was concerned, the Cyprus Problem was over in 1974, has no responsibility for the ongoing non-settlement.!


Denktash has done a lot wrong but it was not all one way traffic the fact that ROC elected EokA after Eoka member has a hell of a lot to do with it, surely even you can see that?
DTA
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:25 pm
Location: LONDON

Postby Kikapu » Fri Apr 02, 2010 5:53 pm

DTA wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
YFred wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
YFred wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:they keep pushing.. they should of never trusted thieves to buy stolen land from them

Palio, how can you accuse a TC who sold his land to the orams as being thief when the ROC hold on to his land in the south.


Tell us YFred. How did the GC land in the north all of a sudden became a TC land, where the TC was entitle to sell it to the Orams as if it was his land, regardless what the situation of his land is in the south. Just tell us how was the TC able to become the legal owner of the GC land that he sold to the Orams.? Just because the RoC has become the guardian of the TCs properties in the south so that they can't be exploited, how does that make the TC owner of the GC's property he sold to the Orams.On what legal basis did the TC became the legal owner of the GC property sold to the Orams. As far as the RoC is concerned, the TC who sold "his" GC property to the Orams, is still the legal owner of his own land in the south.

After 35 years of waiting for the roc, that's a big yes. But if it makes you feel better view it as a lease arrangement. It's not that different. Hava parasi. :lol: :lol: :lol:


So the fact that Denktash kept the north as an "open prison" for all those years because as far as he was concerned, the Cyprus Problem was over in 1974, has no responsibility for the ongoing non-settlement.!


Denktash has done a lot wrong but it was not all one way traffic the fact that ROC elected EokA after Eoka member has a hell of a lot to do with it, surely even you can see that?


YFred had already pointed out in his post regarding your above inference, but he failed to mention Denktash also. Surely even you could have seen that and that there was no need for me to mention it again, was there.??
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby DTA » Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:24 pm

Kikapu wrote:
DTA wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
YFred wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
YFred wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:they keep pushing.. they should of never trusted thieves to buy stolen land from them

Palio, how can you accuse a TC who sold his land to the orams as being thief when the ROC hold on to his land in the south.


Tell us YFred. How did the GC land in the north all of a sudden became a TC land, where the TC was entitle to sell it to the Orams as if it was his land, regardless what the situation of his land is in the south. Just tell us how was the TC able to become the legal owner of the GC land that he sold to the Orams.? Just because the RoC has become the guardian of the TCs properties in the south so that they can't be exploited, how does that make the TC owner of the GC's property he sold to the Orams.On what legal basis did the TC became the legal owner of the GC property sold to the Orams. As far as the RoC is concerned, the TC who sold "his" GC property to the Orams, is still the legal owner of his own land in the south.

After 35 years of waiting for the roc, that's a big yes. But if it makes you feel better view it as a lease arrangement. It's not that different. Hava parasi. :lol: :lol: :lol:


So the fact that Denktash kept the north as an "open prison" for all those years because as far as he was concerned, the Cyprus Problem was over in 1974, has no responsibility for the ongoing non-settlement.!


Denktash has done a lot wrong but it was not all one way traffic the fact that ROC elected EokA after Eoka member has a hell of a lot to do with it, surely even you can see that?


YFred had already pointed out in his post regarding your above inference, but he failed to mention Denktash also. Surely even you could have seen that and that there was no need for me to mention it again, was there.??


I never see you mentioning anything the ROC has done wrong. Can You point me out to just say........ three posts in all your thousands of posts on this forum where you point the wrong doings of the Roc in relation to the TCs please.... pretty please with sugar on top.
DTA
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:25 pm
Location: LONDON

Postby Kikapu » Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:38 pm

DTA wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
DTA wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
YFred wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
YFred wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:they keep pushing.. they should of never trusted thieves to buy stolen land from them

Palio, how can you accuse a TC who sold his land to the orams as being thief when the ROC hold on to his land in the south.


Tell us YFred. How did the GC land in the north all of a sudden became a TC land, where the TC was entitle to sell it to the Orams as if it was his land, regardless what the situation of his land is in the south. Just tell us how was the TC able to become the legal owner of the GC land that he sold to the Orams.? Just because the RoC has become the guardian of the TCs properties in the south so that they can't be exploited, how does that make the TC owner of the GC's property he sold to the Orams.On what legal basis did the TC became the legal owner of the GC property sold to the Orams. As far as the RoC is concerned, the TC who sold "his" GC property to the Orams, is still the legal owner of his own land in the south.

After 35 years of waiting for the roc, that's a big yes. But if it makes you feel better view it as a lease arrangement. It's not that different. Hava parasi. :lol: :lol: :lol:


So the fact that Denktash kept the north as an "open prison" for all those years because as far as he was concerned, the Cyprus Problem was over in 1974, has no responsibility for the ongoing non-settlement.!


Denktash has done a lot wrong but it was not all one way traffic the fact that ROC elected EokA after Eoka member has a hell of a lot to do with it, surely even you can see that?


YFred had already pointed out in his post regarding your above inference, but he failed to mention Denktash also. Surely even you could have seen that and that there was no need for me to mention it again, was there.??


I never see you mentioning anything the ROC has done wrong. Can You point me out to just say........ three posts in all your thousands of posts on this forum where you point the wrong doings of the Roc in relation to the TCs please.... pretty please with sugar on top.


WHY, will it make the wrongs done by "trnc" more justifiable , because they will not with me.!

I'll let my GC friends question wrongs done by their own community to point them out. They can do it much more effectively than ever I can. If you see me defending any wrongs done by the GCs, then you can make the argument of me supporting such wrong doings, but until then, I have enough to keep me busy of wrongs done by our own community and all the Racist, Racists, Idiots and the NeoPartitionist here on the forum.
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby Viewpoint » Fri Apr 02, 2010 6:44 pm

Another deflecting response by Kikapu, his priorities are 101% with the GCs and would never dare post anything remotely against the GC side. This says a great to deal to those that question his credibility and biased views.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Kikapu » Fri Apr 02, 2010 7:00 pm

dp
Last edited by Kikapu on Fri Apr 02, 2010 7:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby Kikapu » Fri Apr 02, 2010 7:02 pm

dp
Last edited by Kikapu on Fri Apr 02, 2010 7:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby Kikapu » Fri Apr 02, 2010 7:04 pm

Viewpoint wrote:Another deflecting response by Kikapu, his priorities are 101% with the GCs and would never dare post anything remotely against the GC side. This says a great to deal to those that question his credibility and biased views.


Well, answer the question. Does it make it any less wrongs done by the "trnc" if I were to criticize the RoC to your satisfaction.???

I'm being very practical, along with Bananiot and Miltiades. Actually more GCs complain of their own community that TCs do. We need more TCs to point out the wrongs done in their own community than trying to point out wrongs done by the GCs community. How many times have you ever criticized the "trnc" for anything.? How about, none, unless I missed one or two in the last 4 years I've been on the forum. All you do is criticize the GCs, and where has it gotten you. You complaints are seen as another idiot TCs with complains, that's all. It is far more effective when GCs complain about the wrongs done by their own community and the same with the TCs, otherwise, your complaints are ignored. Show me where I agree with the GCs on everything as you want to make it to be, other than on Democracy, Human Rights, International Laws and the EU Principles.??
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest