The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Glory and honour to the heroes of EOKA!

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby repulsewarrior » Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:14 am

it is not "greekand/orturk" unless you are willing to give subjugation credence. bicommunal has nothing to do with this ethnic divide as such, rather it is a means to define the significance of State compared to Nation. as a member of a Nation you identify yourself a Person, yet as an Individual within the State all citizens carry none of these distinctions.

this is the single identity and constituencies X and T are dealing with. and the extremists will confound you by playing on your fears. to be bicommunal it is not possible to have two governing bodies, there must be many or one. one failed because the Communal Chamber was ignored, National Assemblies (a second level of governance) are an advancement toward reforming the Constitution of this Unitary State.
User avatar
repulsewarrior
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 14254
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 2:13 am
Location: homeless in Canada

Postby YFred » Thu Apr 08, 2010 10:06 am

denizaksulu wrote:
Bananiot wrote:I repeat, nobody voted in the strict meaning of the term. Simply a petition was signed after Sunday church service.


If the 'TC's' voted after the 'service', they must have been 'Linobambakis' :lol: and not real TC's.

Hang on one dog gone damn minute old boy, what? Never.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


I was there, I should know. Just before every body gets the wrong idea, it was in a previous life.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby YFred » Thu Apr 08, 2010 10:09 am

T_C wrote:From the Hansard archives....

We all know about the plebiscite carefully organised under Archbishop Makarios in 1950, when two books were placed in the churches and the people were gathered in by special messengers: the priests urged them in, and they were made to come, and in public every citizen had to write either in one book or the other. In one book it said: "I am in favour of annexation by Greece." In the other it said: "I am not in favour." Funnily enough, 95 per cent. of the population voted in favour. I can only say that I express my great admiration for the 5 per cent. who risked their lives by voting against it. I can think of countries where the vote is 99.99 per cent. in those circumstances.


http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/lord ... 02P0-03077

Well done T_C this puts that one to sleep then. Vote my arse. Shove it up yours O.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby YFred » Thu Apr 08, 2010 10:11 am

Oracle wrote:
T_C wrote:From the Hansard archives....

We all know about the plebiscite carefully organised under Archbishop Makarios in 1950, when two books were placed in the churches and the people were gathered in by special messengers: the priests urged them in, and they were made to come, and in public every citizen had to write either in one book or the other. In one book it said: "I am in favour of annexation by Greece." In the other it said: "I am not in favour." Funnily enough, 95 per cent. of the population voted in favour. I can only say that I express my great admiration for the 5 per cent. who risked their lives by voting against it. I can think of countries where the vote is 99.99 per cent. in those circumstances.


http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/lord ... 02P0-03077


This is illogical garbage. The British wanted to discount the referendum and so they made up anything they wished. Not long before, many GCs fought for the British in WWII on the understanding that Enosis would be allowed. What possible reason could the GCs have had to prefer to stay under the Brits, or forever under the threat of Turks?

After all, they only needed 51% to say 'yes' to Enosis. Why make it look "iffy" by enticing 95%?

Do you consider that vote to be in a Greek Style democratic free vote, not that different to the vote in 2004 then. Do you Greeks never learn?
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby miltiades » Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:04 pm

Fred , in your own opinion can you seriously consider this scenario and respond honestly !
Had the G/Cs been the 18% of the population of Cyprus and the T/Cs the 80% , would you have respected the wishes of the 18% and refrain from wanting to part of Turkey or would you have ignored the minority.
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby YFred » Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:08 pm

miltiades wrote:Fred , in your own opinion can you seriously consider this scenario and respond honestly !
Had the G/Cs been the 18% of the population of Cyprus and the T/Cs the 80% , would you have respected the wishes of the 18% and refrain from wanting to part of Turkey or would you have ignored the minority.

Be prepared to be surprised.
Without firing a single shot, I would have given the minority the chance to vote for and select what it is they wish to do, inc independence, and work out the land percentages on the maps accordingly. Ignore the minority, never.
We were pushed into 2.5 percent of the land Milti. What roc did was legalised criminality.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby DT. » Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:12 pm

YFred wrote:
miltiades wrote:Fred , in your own opinion can you seriously consider this scenario and respond honestly !
Had the G/Cs been the 18% of the population of Cyprus and the T/Cs the 80% , would you have respected the wishes of the 18% and refrain from wanting to part of Turkey or would you have ignored the minority.

Be prepared to be surprised.
Without firing a single shot, I would have given the minority the chance to vote for and select what it is they wish to do, inc independence, and work out the land percentages on the maps accordingly. Ignore the minority, never.
We were pushed into 2.5 percent of the land Milti. What roc did was legalised criminality.


Care to explain to your friend Milt how you figured out the magic number of 2.5%?

Come on....he deserves a laugh.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby boomerang » Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:13 pm

DT. wrote:
YFred wrote:
miltiades wrote:Fred , in your own opinion can you seriously consider this scenario and respond honestly !
Had the G/Cs been the 18% of the population of Cyprus and the T/Cs the 80% , would you have respected the wishes of the 18% and refrain from wanting to part of Turkey or would you have ignored the minority.

Be prepared to be surprised.
Without firing a single shot, I would have given the minority the chance to vote for and select what it is they wish to do, inc independence, and work out the land percentages on the maps accordingly. Ignore the minority, never.
We were pushed into 2.5 percent of the land Milti. What roc did was legalised criminality.


Care to explain to your friend Milt how you figured out the magic number of 2.5%?

Come on....he deserves a laugh.


:lol:
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby YFred » Thu Apr 08, 2010 3:49 pm

DT. wrote:
YFred wrote:
miltiades wrote:Fred , in your own opinion can you seriously consider this scenario and respond honestly !
Had the G/Cs been the 18% of the population of Cyprus and the T/Cs the 80% , would you have respected the wishes of the 18% and refrain from wanting to part of Turkey or would you have ignored the minority.

Be prepared to be surprised.
Without firing a single shot, I would have given the minority the chance to vote for and select what it is they wish to do, inc independence, and work out the land percentages on the maps accordingly. Ignore the minority, never.
We were pushed into 2.5 percent of the land Milti. What roc did was legalised criminality.


Care to explain to your friend Milt how you figured out the magic number of 2.5%?

Come on....he deserves a laugh.

If only it was funny. When you stole most of the TC lands till 74. But we forgive you and your discretion.
Unlike you where you were still inside your old man's balls, I lived it. I don't need to prove it.
Get it, I lived the nightmare you bastard.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby miltiades » Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:18 pm

YFred wrote:
miltiades wrote:Fred , in your own opinion can you seriously consider this scenario and respond honestly !
Had the G/Cs been the 18% of the population of Cyprus and the T/Cs the 80% , would you have respected the wishes of the 18% and refrain from wanting to part of Turkey or would you have ignored the minority.

Be prepared to be surprised.
Without firing a single shot, I would have given the minority the chance to vote for and select what it is they wish to do, inc independence, and work out the land percentages on the maps accordingly. Ignore the minority, never.
We were pushed into 2.5 percent of the land Milti. What roc did was legalised criminality.[/quote
As I understand it some were forced by the fear of EOKA B terrorists to seek refuge in safe enclaves and some were forced by TMT to abandon their homes and move to these enclaves.
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests