Cyprus-Forum.com

[Malapapa]

Has Talat promised to take it down even if a solution is not reached then?

Oh no, no, no, if we take the statement and the OP at face value it looks like def conditional on settlement offer.

Talat can't promise to tie his own shoe lace without permission. Of course he can't promise to clean up the mountain.

So according too your "logic" he has obtained permission.

Talat wouldn't need to obtain permission after a "solution". It would have nothing to do with Turkey then.

[Viewpoint]

dp

[Viewpoint]

Has Talat promised to take it down even if a solution is not reached then?

Oh no, no, no, if we take the statement and the OP at face value it looks like def conditional on settlement offer.

Talat can't promise to tie his own shoe lace without permission. Of course he can't promise to clean up the mountain.

So according too your "logic" he has obtained permission.

Talat wouldn't need to obtain permission after a "solution". It would have nothing to do with Turkey then.

Only if agreed in a solution and rubber stamped by the TCs in a referendum but it appears you have missed the point hes saying it is a goodwill gesture that they will bring it down, they could claim the opposite how productive would that be?

[Kikapu]

Has Talat promised to take it down even if a solution is not reached then?

Oh no, no, no, if we take the statement and the OP at face value it looks like def conditional on settlement offer.

Talat can't promise to tie his own shoe lace without permission. Of course he can't promise to clean up the mountain.

So according too your "logic" he has obtained permission.

Talat wouldn't need to obtain permission after a "solution". It would have nothing to do with Turkey then.

Only if agreed in a solution and rubber stamped by the TCs in a referendum but it appears you have missed the point hes saying it is a goodwill gesture that they will bring it down, they could claim the opposite how productive would that be?

In a settlement based on True Federation, the Federal Government will bring it down whether Talat wants it or not, therefore it is not a "good gesture" by Talat, but a fore gone conclusion that the flag on the graffiti mountain will come down.

[Viewpoint]

What if the TCs force that the flag remains as the current TRNC flag becomes the flag of the north state would promising to remove it now constitue a goodwill gesture? It appears that whatever we do you will walk all over it anyway due to your one sided views.

[wyoming cowboy]

Has Talat promised to take it down even if a solution is not reached then?

Oh no, no, no, if we take the statement and the OP at face value it looks like def conditional on settlement offer.

Talat can't promise to tie his own shoe lace without permission. Of course he can't promise to clean up the mountain.

So according too your "logic" he has obtained permission.

Talat wouldn't need to obtain permission after a "solution". It would have nothing to do with Turkey then.

i agree the flag is disgusting and so on ....but my question to you is how do you see the federal government ordering it down? thats not the job of the federal government dude

Only if agreed in a solution and rubber stamped by the TCs in a referendum but it appears you have missed the point hes saying it is a goodwill gesture that they will bring it down, they could claim the opposite how productive would that be?

In a settlement based on True Federation, the Federal Government will bring it down whether Talat wants it or not, therefore it is not a "good gesture" by Talat, but a fore gone conclusion that the flag on the graffiti mountain will come down.

[wyoming cowboy]

Has Talat promised to take it down even if a solution is not reached then?

Oh no, no, no, if we take the statement and the OP at face value it looks like def conditional on settlement offer.

Talat can't promise to tie his own shoe lace without permission. Of course he can't promise to clean up the mountain.

So according too your "logic" he has obtained permission.

Talat wouldn't need to obtain permission after a "solution". It would have nothing to do with Turkey then.

It would not be the federal governments job to take that disgusting flag down in a federal republic, it would be on the shoulders of the constituent state to do so

Only if agreed in a solution and rubber stamped by the TCs in a referendum but it appears you have missed the point hes saying it is a goodwill gesture that they will bring it down, they could claim the opposite how productive would that be?

In a settlement based on True Federation, the Federal Government will bring it down whether Talat wants it or not, therefore it is not a "good gesture" by Talat, but a fore gone conclusion that the flag on the graffiti mountain will come down.

[wyoming cowboy]

How do you see the federal government bringing down that disgusting flag, in a true federation the constituent state would have to decide.....I seriously dont think that you people know what a federal republic is all about

[bill cobbett]

How do you see the federal government bringing down that disgusting flag, in a true federation the constituent state would have to decide.....I seriously dont think that you people know what a federal republic is all about

Wyoming file, think the Baycrap rubbish post is only referring to the very offensive monstrosity on Pentadactylos, not normal, smaller flags on poles.

Still think we should all keep in mind that Baycrap should be taken with a little pinch of salt and with a sceptical mind.

[Gasman]

I'm surprised no one mentions other huge monstrosities. Yes, the flag can be seen from the South and it is HUGE but, when you are over there, just the sheer number of smaller flags EVERYWHERE, together with monuments and statues and plaques to Attaturk and building side sized flags with his face on them are more 'in your face'. You can only see the huge flag if you are facing it.

What about these huge menacing structures on the mountains?