Cyprus-Forum.com

[Yourdaddy]

From what I gathered the Annan Plan provided that Greek Cypriots had the burden of paying compensation to refugees and that this would be in form of long term bonds that would take many years to mature. From what I have read the IPC has actually paid refugees already in cold hard cash, not long term bonds and the CA$H comes from Ankara not from Cyprus.

I am not going to debate the adequacy of compensation or legality/treason in applying to the IPC, but to me , even this sounds like an improvement on the Annan Plan.In practical terms that is an improvement for refugees in 2 ways already. A review of settlements/judgments from the IPC has also revealed that orders of restitution in towns where refugees would not have been granted restitution in any structured or clear way.

Am I wrong in assuming that even this ECHR IPC verdict is more advantageous than the Annan Plan for Cypriot refugees?

[Get Real!]

One of the dumbest comparisons I've ever come across!

It’s like comparing a pair of scissors with a steering wheel!

[Oracle]

what is better for refugees, Annan 5 vs IPC?

Annan Plan 5 is better for refugees than IPC
ICP is better for refugees than Annan 5

You forgot to add:

"Both are crap!"

[Yourdaddy]

Get Real , I think you do not understand what I meant so maybe you need to piss off. Both suck but which produces the best outcome.

[Get Real!]

Get Real , I think you do not understand what I meant so maybe you need to piss off. Both suck but which produces the best outcome.

What is better for refugees is for Turkey to abide by decades-old international law…

UN RESOLUTION 361 (1974)
http://www.un.int/cyprus/scr353.htm

UN RESOLUTION 541 (1983)
http://www.un.int/cyprus/scr541.htm

...everything else is hogwash!

[Epiktitos]

Get Real , I think you do not understand what I meant so maybe you need to piss off. Both suck but which produces the best outcome.

You do not understand that for anyone to answer your boneheaded question requires acknowledging an absurd and unacceptable premise, namely that either are even remotely acceptable or even worthy of serious discussion (hint: they are not). Your question is akin to asking someone to choose between granite and basalt as a breakfast spread.

Are you perchance a teenager?

[Yourdaddy]

You do not understand that for anyone to answer your boneheaded question requires acknowledging an absurd and unacceptable premise, namely that either are even remotely acceptable or even worthy of serious discussion (hint: they are not). Your question is akin to asking someone to choose between granite and basalt as a breakfast spread.

Are you perchance a teenager?

Yeah maybe I am a teenager you old loser! What did your stupid generation achieve so far?

Get real -Get stuffed but first -take look at the date of those resolutions. My MUM was 6 years old in 1974.

Last time I checked nobody in the international community gives a pigs ass about what is acceptable to us, so if you cann't answer a simple question you can piss off too to your nursing home its time to change your colostomy bag you senile old prick the excrement is over flowing.

I'm asking a simple question which is worse long term bonds paid by Cyprus or cash paid by Turkey?

[paliometoxo]

how old are you your?

my mum was around 11 in 74

[Gasman]

Is the IPC in the first option the same body as the ICP in the second option?

[Yourdaddy]

how old are you your?

my mum was around 11 in 74

16, I am still allowed on here. Is this place so sacred that only old men can come here. They should go play lawn bowls or bingo and PISS OFF!