Cyprus-Forum.com

[YFred]

The Cyprus issue is a difficult one to solve. Talat deserves some more time to try and solve it with Christofias. I think that if the TC's vote for Eroglu they will be making the same mistake as the GC's back in 2003 when they voted for a staunch rejectionist (Papadopoulos).

Erdogan, Papandreou, Christofias and Talat can give their best shot for solution. The equation will be destroyed with Eroglu and the nationalists that support him. Viewpoint, I can also give you a more simple answer. All the anti solution GC's are rooting for Eroglu right now and the Archbishop has made his spoken with the man upstairs for him and this is not a joke.

Do you have anybody else in mind. Please reveal your thoughts.


really?

There is no evidence which shows that either TC leadership or presidency has any authority on any internal or external subject of Northern district. Talat is a peon who can promise no more than Denktash on any manner. Neither anyone who becomes candidate for that position can be anything else than a puppet of Turkey.

However, the image of puppet has an importance for outside world, therefore the puppeteer has to seem like "hardworking" in order to make audience believe that there is a "democratic" platform in occupied area and a "election" process goes on. On the other hand with a overpopulated settlers problem it is impossible to have a real election process which represents real Cypriots.

There are only 2 realistic strategy at this point. 1- To support Eroglu in order to change the image of pupeteer and ideas of audience from positive to negative. 2- Not to vote and reject whole Banana Republic, which shows to EU that Cypriot people does not want either the puppets or the puppeteer with an indirect way, which will create more politic problems to them. I choose 2nd.

At least you should be happy, cause by taking choice 2, you will facilitate choice 1 which is the choice of bash patriots and GO church in the south.

You realy need to reconsider the effect Erouglu will have on the negotiations.

[Paphitis]

So,being placed first Eroglu will get the Donkey vote!!!
He should be the sure winner!!!

You look so happy!

[YFred]

So,being placed first Eroglu will get the Donkey vote!!!
He should be the sure winner!!!

You look so happy!

Is GR allowed to vote in these elections?

[Vuryek]

The Cyprus issue is a difficult one to solve. Talat deserves some more time to try and solve it with Christofias. I think that if the TC's vote for Eroglu they will be making the same mistake as the GC's back in 2003 when they voted for a staunch rejectionist (Papadopoulos).

Erdogan, Papandreou, Christofias and Talat can give their best shot for solution. The equation will be destroyed with Eroglu and the nationalists that support him. Viewpoint, I can also give you a more simple answer. All the anti solution GC's are rooting for Eroglu right now and the Archbishop has made his spoken with the man upstairs for him and this is not a joke.

Do you have anybody else in mind. Please reveal your thoughts.


really?

There is no evidence which shows that either TC leadership or presidency has any authority on any internal or external subject of Northern district. Talat is a peon who can promise no more than Denktash on any manner. Neither anyone who becomes candidate for that position can be anything else than a puppet of Turkey.

However, the image of puppet has an importance for outside world, therefore the puppeteer has to seem like "hardworking" in order to make audience believe that there is a "democratic" platform in occupied area and a "election" process goes on. On the other hand with a overpopulated settlers problem it is impossible to have a real election process which represents real Cypriots.

There are only 2 realistic strategy at this point. 1- To support Eroglu in order to change the image of pupeteer and ideas of audience from positive to negative. 2- Not to vote and reject whole Banana Republic, which shows to EU that Cypriot people does not want either the puppets or the puppeteer with an indirect way, which will create more politic problems to them. I choose 2nd.

At least you should be happy, cause by taking choice 2, you will facilitate choice 1 which is the choice of bash patriots and GO church in the south.

You realy need to reconsider the effect Erouglu will have on the negotiations.

I think it is clearly stated above that Eroglu has no effect on negotiations, neither Talat does. If there was a difference somebody has to explain "why the same process has continued where Denktash left, dring Talat period?"

Talat, who suppose to be opposite of Denktash, had the chance, but acted as Denktash... maybe worse than him. Which means, that position measn nothing and there will be no difference for Eroglu

[Paphitis]

The Cyprus issue is a difficult one to solve. Talat deserves some more time to try and solve it with Christofias. I think that if the TC's vote for Eroglu they will be making the same mistake as the GC's back in 2003 when they voted for a staunch rejectionist (Papadopoulos).

Erdogan, Papandreou, Christofias and Talat can give their best shot for solution. The equation will be destroyed with Eroglu and the nationalists that support him. Viewpoint, I can also give you a more simple answer. All the anti solution GC's are rooting for Eroglu right now and the Archbishop has made his spoken with the man upstairs for him and this is not a joke.

Do you have anybody else in mind. Please reveal your thoughts.


really?

There is no evidence which shows that either TC leadership or presidency has any authority on any internal or external subject of Northern district. Talat is a peon who can promise no more than Denktash on any manner. Neither anyone who becomes candidate for that position can be anything else than a puppet of Turkey.

However, the image of puppet has an importance for outside world, therefore the puppeteer has to seem like "hardworking" in order to make audience believe that there is a "democratic" platform in occupied area and a "election" process goes on. On the other hand with a overpopulated settlers problem it is impossible to have a real election process which represents real Cypriots.

There are only 2 realistic strategy at this point. 1- To support Eroglu in order to change the image of pupeteer and ideas of audience from positive to negative. 2- Not to vote and reject whole Banana Republic, which shows to EU that Cypriot people does not want either the puppets or the puppeteer with an indirect way, which will create more politic problems to them. I choose 2nd.

At least you should be happy, cause by taking choice 2, you will facilitate choice 1 which is the choice of bash patriots and GO church in the south.

You realy need to reconsider the effect Erouglu will have on the negotiations.

It doesn't really matter who wins.

But we DO prefer Eroglu over Talat, because as Vuryek said, it will change your outward image to the negative.

Either way, there won't be a solution, so we might as well have Eroglu in the chair to make our job easier during the imminent blame game phase after the talks collapse.

GO EROGLU!

[BirKibrisli]

So,being placed first Eroglu will get the Donkey vote!!!
He should be the sure winner!!!

You look so happy!

I was laughing at my own joke...Obviously you have no sense of humour...

[Paphitis]

So,being placed first Eroglu will get the Donkey vote!!!
He should be the sure winner!!!

You look so happy!

I was laughing at my own joke...Obviously you have no sense of humour...

I am very happy that your TMT bum chum is going to win the election.

It appears that you have once again slipped up, by once again displaying your empathy and sympathy whilst at the same time supporting Eroglu's 'election'.

Way to go!

[insan]

The Cyprus issue is a difficult one to solve. Talat deserves some more time to try and solve it with Christofias. I think that if the TC's vote for Eroglu they will be making the same mistake as the GC's back in 2003 when they voted for a staunch rejectionist (Papadopoulos).

Erdogan, Papandreou, Christofias and Talat can give their best shot for solution. The equation will be destroyed with Eroglu and the nationalists that support him. Viewpoint, I can also give you a more simple answer. All the anti solution GC's are rooting for Eroglu right now and the Archbishop has made his spoken with the man upstairs for him and this is not a joke.

Do you have anybody else in mind. Please reveal your thoughts.


really?

There is no evidence which shows that either TC leadership or presidency has any authority on any internal or external subject of Northern district. Talat is a peon who can promise no more than Denktash on any manner. Neither anyone who becomes candidate for that position can be anything else than a puppet of Turkey.

However, the image of puppet has an importance for outside world, therefore the puppeteer has to seem like "hardworking" in order to make audience believe that there is a "democratic" platform in occupied area and a "election" process goes on. On the other hand with a overpopulated settlers problem it is impossible to have a real election process which represents real Cypriots.

There are only 2 realistic strategy at this point. 1- To support Eroglu in order to change the image of pupeteer and ideas of audience from positive to negative. 2- Not to vote and reject whole Banana Republic, which shows to EU that Cypriot people does not want either the puppets or the puppeteer with an indirect way, which will create more politic problems to them. I choose 2nd.

At least you should be happy, cause by taking choice 2, you will facilitate choice 1 which is the choice of bash patriots and GO church in the south.

You realy need to reconsider the effect Erouglu will have on the negotiations.

I think it is clearly stated above that Eroglu has no effect on negotiations, neither Talat does. If there was a difference somebody has to explain "why the same process has continued where Denktash left, dring Talat period?"

Talat, who suppose to be opposite of Denktash, had the chance, but acted as Denktash... maybe worse than him. Which means, that position measn nothing and there will be no difference for Eroglu

As if there had been any difference on GC political stance since Makarios... all GC negotiators have defended the same basic principles which has been called red lines of their communitie's "national cause" ... so why should Talat or any other TC negotiator stop defending the "national cause" of their own community?

The only difference between Talat and Eroglu is their style of speech... and of course intellectual capacity...

Eroğlu is a pure dunderhead that his words not only hurt GCs but TC leftists too...

What do you expect from an illiterate right winger...

PS: Does Anastasiadis still throw ashtrays in house of representatives?

[Paphitis]

The Cyprus issue is a difficult one to solve. Talat deserves some more time to try and solve it with Christofias. I think that if the TC's vote for Eroglu they will be making the same mistake as the GC's back in 2003 when they voted for a staunch rejectionist (Papadopoulos).

Erdogan, Papandreou, Christofias and Talat can give their best shot for solution. The equation will be destroyed with Eroglu and the nationalists that support him. Viewpoint, I can also give you a more simple answer. All the anti solution GC's are rooting for Eroglu right now and the Archbishop has made his spoken with the man upstairs for him and this is not a joke.

Do you have anybody else in mind. Please reveal your thoughts.


really?

There is no evidence which shows that either TC leadership or presidency has any authority on any internal or external subject of Northern district. Talat is a peon who can promise no more than Denktash on any manner. Neither anyone who becomes candidate for that position can be anything else than a puppet of Turkey.

However, the image of puppet has an importance for outside world, therefore the puppeteer has to seem like "hardworking" in order to make audience believe that there is a "democratic" platform in occupied area and a "election" process goes on. On the other hand with a overpopulated settlers problem it is impossible to have a real election process which represents real Cypriots.

There are only 2 realistic strategy at this point. 1- To support Eroglu in order to change the image of pupeteer and ideas of audience from positive to negative. 2- Not to vote and reject whole Banana Republic, which shows to EU that Cypriot people does not want either the puppets or the puppeteer with an indirect way, which will create more politic problems to them. I choose 2nd.

At least you should be happy, cause by taking choice 2, you will facilitate choice 1 which is the choice of bash patriots and GO church in the south.

You realy need to reconsider the effect Erouglu will have on the negotiations.

I think it is clearly stated above that Eroglu has no effect on negotiations, neither Talat does. If there was a difference somebody has to explain "why the same process has continued where Denktash left, dring Talat period?"

Talat, who suppose to be opposite of Denktash, had the chance, but acted as Denktash... maybe worse than him. Which means, that position measn nothing and there will be no difference for Eroglu

As if there had been any difference on GC political stance since Makarios... all GC negotiators have defended the same basic principles which has been called red lines of their communitie's "national cause" ... so why should Talat or any other TC negotiator stop defending the "national cause" of their own community?

The only difference between Talat and Eroglu is their style of speech... and of course intellectual capacity...

Eroğlu is a pure dunderhead that his words not only hurt GCs but TC leftists too...

What do you expect from an illiterate right winger...

PS: Does Anastasiadis still throw ashtrays in house of representatives?

If it ain't Y-Freak's heroin junkie bum chum!

Long time no hear, shit head!

[halil]

The Cyprus issue is a difficult one to solve. Talat deserves some more time to try and solve it with Christofias. I think that if the TC's vote for Eroglu they will be making the same mistake as the GC's back in 2003 when they voted for a staunch rejectionist (Papadopoulos).

Erdogan, Papandreou, Christofias and Talat can give their best shot for solution. The equation will be destroyed with Eroglu and the nationalists that support him. Viewpoint, I can also give you a more simple answer. All the anti solution GC's are rooting for Eroglu right now and the Archbishop has made his spoken with the man upstairs for him and this is not a joke.

Do you have anybody else in mind. Please reveal your thoughts.


really?

There is no evidence which shows that either TC leadership or presidency has any authority on any internal or external subject of Northern district. Talat is a peon who can promise no more than Denktash on any manner. Neither anyone who becomes candidate for that position can be anything else than a puppet of Turkey.

However, the image of puppet has an importance for outside world, therefore the puppeteer has to seem like "hardworking" in order to make audience believe that there is a "democratic" platform in occupied area and a "election" process goes on. On the other hand with a overpopulated settlers problem it is impossible to have a real election process which represents real Cypriots.

There are only 2 realistic strategy at this point. 1- To support Eroglu in order to change the image of pupeteer and ideas of audience from positive to negative. 2- Not to vote and reject whole Banana Republic, which shows to EU that Cypriot people does not want either the puppets or the puppeteer with an indirect way, which will create more politic problems to them. I choose 2nd.

At least you should be happy, cause by taking choice 2, you will facilitate choice 1 which is the choice of bash patriots and GO church in the south.

You realy need to reconsider the effect Erouglu will have on the negotiations.

I think it is clearly stated above that Eroglu has no effect on negotiations, neither Talat does. If there was a difference somebody has to explain "why the same process has continued where Denktash left, dring Talat period?"

Talat, who suppose to be opposite of Denktash, had the chance, but acted as Denktash... maybe worse than him. Which means, that position measn nothing and there will be no difference for Eroglu

As if there had been any difference on GC political stance since Makarios... all GC negotiators have defended the same basic principles which has been called red lines of their communitie's "national cause" ... so why should Talat or any other TC negotiator stop defending the "national cause" of their own community?

The only difference between Talat and Eroglu is their style of speech... and of course intellectual capacity...

Eroğlu is a pure dunderhead that his words not only hurt GCs but TC leftists too...

What do you expect from an illiterate right winger...

PS: Does Anastasiadis still throw ashtrays in house of representatives?

I am 100 % with u on this one INSANCIGIM........... let them to speak gardash.... Ağzı olan gonuşur.