The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Wind Farm

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Postby cyprusgrump » Mon Mar 22, 2010 5:52 pm

georgios100 wrote:
cyprusgrump wrote:
georgios100 wrote:
cyprusgrump wrote:
georgios100 wrote:
apc2010 wrote:
georgios100 wrote:
apc2010 wrote:Do the electric cars use fossil fuel or windmill electric?????


apc2010, is this a real question?

Electric cars use electricity produced by many ways, including wind power.
The part you are missing is this: Electric cars don't use petrol, that's why these cars don't have a gas tank but a battery bank, get it?

Georgios100

Electric cars require a massive amount of batteries which are envromentally harmfull to manufacture, discard or recycle. If you are recharging an electric car with fossil fuel ,mile for mile no better overall


The batteries are a problem, perhaps recycle might be acceptable. If renewable "hydro" was more available then mile for mile would make more sense. Still, conventional cars are made via fossil fuels and burn fossil fuels to move us around. Electric cars "burn" electricity, reducing their footprint and provide cleaner air for us to breath. It's a start. We are beginning to do something about carbon emissions and pollution. We have a long way to go. Electric cars will lead the way to better and "greener" solutions. It's better than nothing.

Georgios100


Electric cars.... :roll:

Not only do they use Nickel in the batteries which has to be mined and transported half-way around the world to Japan where they are manufactured...

...but they run on fossil fuels. The electricity is generated by burning fossil fuel... all you are doing is moving the pollution from one place to another...

'Renewable energy' like wind will never replace the billions of gallons of crude oil we turn into petrol and diesel to run our vehicles. The only current advantage of electric vehicles is efficiency gained by recharging overnight when there is spare generating capacity and plants would otherwise need to be shut down...

It is a fantasy to suggest that we can do this, an expensive fantasy as is having 30% of Cyprus' generating capacity from wind...

Denmark achieved 20% windpower. Population 5.5 million people with heavy industrial sector. Electricity demand 10 times greater than Cyprus.
Still a fantasy?


I can look out of my window this morning and see them assembling the second wind generator - why? because it is so calm that they can attach massive blades hanging on the end of a crane. So this is probably a week now when the 30% of our generating capacity you would like to see from wind would produce nothing at all...

You like to see nuclear stacks from your kitchen window? Not many will agree with, my friend.

Are you suggesting that 30% of the country should close down on wind-less days, hospitals closed, operations cancelled?


30% windpower is the yearly average. While the wind is there, we can harvest it. What is wrong with that? Nearly all the countries in the world are installing wind power. Do you think it's politics? Do you think everyone is stupid?

Georgios100


Well yes, they apparently are... :lol:

While there is wind we can harvest it... but when the wind stops we have to provide an alternate source of energy.

Paying twice to get a source of electricity is clearly mad.

And think what we could have achieved if we hadn't spent billions on pointless wind farms? We may have solved the fusion problem...

And lastly, referring to your ridiculous scare tactics (typical of eco-fascists), why exactly would the nuclear plant be built outside of my kitchen...? Surely, they'd build it next to existing generating facilities allowing it to use the existing distribution network?


You are the one that complained about the turbines visible from your window... the scare tactics is your field, but where ever they install the nuclear stacks, the visibility is there.

The fusion reactor is far from reality... I bet oil will run out before any real progress in made. In the meantime, wind is harvested for many years now... more efficient turbines "see" the market more often than before.

The electric car... see link http://gm-volt.com/

Related story.
The Niagara hydro plant produces enormous amounts of electricity via the water falls, totally renewable. Some 50 golf courses in the area recharge all their electric golf carts daily for the last 15 years. Can you imagine how many thousands of gallons petrol is saved? People that live in the area can charge their "Volt" cars from the same renewable source. This is a reality, not fiction. Unlike the negative opinions like yours, other countries already are implementing these new renewable principles on every day life. Maybe, in Cyprus, people should be more open minded and welcome windpower instead of bitching about the color of the tower.

Georgios


I think the fusion reactor is closer than the 'green lobby' would like us to believe... Further, I bet if we hadn't wasted so much on building wind turbines all over the world we could have had it by now...

But how does a wind farm in Cyprus relate to Niagra falls? This is typical obfuscation! :lol: Nobody is denying that renewable energy sources like hydro generation (driven by the extremely reliable sun) can be used to generate clean energy....

I am arguing that wind farms do not produce a cheap, reliable source of energy as they depend (obviously!) on the wind and have to be backed-up by traditional generating capacity requiring the end user to pay twice...

It would be much better to invest in research into fusion or simply retro-fitting insulation and/or PV to Cypriot homes.
User avatar
cyprusgrump
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8520
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Pissouri, Cyprus

Postby apc2010 » Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:02 pm

denmark=6000 wind turbines
Denmark highest electric bill per person in europe
Denmark 6000 wind turbines total output for feb 2003 =ZERO

DEnmark 6000 wind turbines but no convential power plants shut.???
User avatar
apc2010
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2522
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:11 pm

Postby cyprusgrump » Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:07 pm

apc2010 wrote:denmark=6000 wind turbines
Denmark highest electric bill per person in europe
Denmark 6000 wind turbines total output for feb 2003 =ZERO

DEnmark 6000 wind turbines but no convential power plants shut.???


Quite so!

georgios100 says they get 20% of their power from wind... which means that not only has the consumer had to pay for 6,000 turbines but an additional 20% of conventional generating capacity sitting idle for when the wind stops...
User avatar
cyprusgrump
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8520
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Pissouri, Cyprus

Postby georgios100 » Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:12 pm

cyprusgrump wrote:
georgios100 wrote:
cyprusgrump wrote:
georgios100 wrote:
cyprusgrump wrote:
georgios100 wrote:
apc2010 wrote:
georgios100 wrote:
apc2010 wrote:Do the electric cars use fossil fuel or windmill electric?????


apc2010, is this a real question?

Electric cars use electricity produced by many ways, including wind power.
The part you are missing is this: Electric cars don't use petrol, that's why these cars don't have a gas tank but a battery bank, get it?

Georgios100

Electric cars require a massive amount of batteries which are envromentally harmfull to manufacture, discard or recycle. If you are recharging an electric car with fossil fuel ,mile for mile no better overall


The batteries are a problem, perhaps recycle might be acceptable. If renewable "hydro" was more available then mile for mile would make more sense. Still, conventional cars are made via fossil fuels and burn fossil fuels to move us around. Electric cars "burn" electricity, reducing their footprint and provide cleaner air for us to breath. It's a start. We are beginning to do something about carbon emissions and pollution. We have a long way to go. Electric cars will lead the way to better and "greener" solutions. It's better than nothing.

Georgios100


Electric cars.... :roll:

Not only do they use Nickel in the batteries which has to be mined and transported half-way around the world to Japan where they are manufactured...

...but they run on fossil fuels. The electricity is generated by burning fossil fuel... all you are doing is moving the pollution from one place to another...

'Renewable energy' like wind will never replace the billions of gallons of crude oil we turn into petrol and diesel to run our vehicles. The only current advantage of electric vehicles is efficiency gained by recharging overnight when there is spare generating capacity and plants would otherwise need to be shut down...

It is a fantasy to suggest that we can do this, an expensive fantasy as is having 30% of Cyprus' generating capacity from wind...

Denmark achieved 20% windpower. Population 5.5 million people with heavy industrial sector. Electricity demand 10 times greater than Cyprus.
Still a fantasy?


I can look out of my window this morning and see them assembling the second wind generator - why? because it is so calm that they can attach massive blades hanging on the end of a crane. So this is probably a week now when the 30% of our generating capacity you would like to see from wind would produce nothing at all...

You like to see nuclear stacks from your kitchen window? Not many will agree with, my friend.

Are you suggesting that 30% of the country should close down on wind-less days, hospitals closed, operations cancelled?


30% windpower is the yearly average. While the wind is there, we can harvest it. What is wrong with that? Nearly all the countries in the world are installing wind power. Do you think it's politics? Do you think everyone is stupid?

Georgios100


Well yes, they apparently are... :lol:

While there is wind we can harvest it... but when the wind stops we have to provide an alternate source of energy.

Paying twice to get a source of electricity is clearly mad.

And think what we could have achieved if we hadn't spent billions on pointless wind farms? We may have solved the fusion problem...

And lastly, referring to your ridiculous scare tactics (typical of eco-fascists), why exactly would the nuclear plant be built outside of my kitchen...? Surely, they'd build it next to existing generating facilities allowing it to use the existing distribution network?


You are the one that complained about the turbines visible from your window... the scare tactics is your field, but where ever they install the nuclear stacks, the visibility is there.

The fusion reactor is far from reality... I bet oil will run out before any real progress in made. In the meantime, wind is harvested for many years now... more efficient turbines "see" the market more often than before.

The electric car... see link http://gm-volt.com/

Related story.
The Niagara hydro plant produces enormous amounts of electricity via the water falls, totally renewable. Some 50 golf courses in the area recharge all their electric golf carts daily for the last 15 years. Can you imagine how many thousands of gallons petrol is saved? People that live in the area can charge their "Volt" cars from the same renewable source. This is a reality, not fiction. Unlike the negative opinions like yours, other countries already are implementing these new renewable principles on every day life. Maybe, in Cyprus, people should be more open minded and welcome windpower instead of bitching about the color of the tower.

Georgios


I think the fusion reactor is closer than the 'green lobby' would like us to believe... Further, I bet if we hadn't wasted so much on building wind turbines all over the world we could have had it by now...

But how does a wind farm in Cyprus relate to Niagra falls? This is typical obfuscation! :lol: Nobody is denying that renewable energy sources like hydro generation (driven by the extremely reliable sun) can be used to generate clean energy....




Cyprus can not relate to Niagara falls. We don't have hydro capabilities here but we have wind and sun. For now, wind is the only viable option. Maybe later, solar might gain ground if the efficiencies get better.

Fusion link http://www.fusion.org.uk/

After some 20 years, little progress is made. They estimate it will take another 30 years to commercialize this method. Don't get me wrong. I am as excited as you are about fusion, the best solution available to us. For now, we can entertain other renewables till fusion is done.

Georgios100
User avatar
georgios100
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:21 pm
Location: Usa

Postby apc2010 » Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:13 pm

Also high peak demands will be extreme heat and cold ,generally when there is no wind (in Cyprus)
User avatar
apc2010
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2522
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:11 pm

Postby RichardB » Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:15 pm

As part of the ongoing talks Pres X should solve the Settler problem by giving one (settler that is )to each Cypriot family to power their electricity via pedal power

2 Birds killed with one stone , The settler problem and clean electricity :lol:


Image

Naturally any one with more than 3 bedrooms may apply at the appropriate govt dept for a concession for 2 settlers

please note Carpetbaggers may also apply for these generating positions
User avatar
RichardB
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3644
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 9:48 pm
Location: Blackpool/Lefkosia

Postby cyprusgrump » Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:28 pm

apc2010 wrote:Also high peak demands will be extreme heat and cold ,generally when there is no wind (in Cyprus)


I've just done a little reading...

41 wind turbines = 41,000 tonnes of concrete (the manufacturing of which is one of the biggest producers of CO2) and over six thousand tonnes of steel...

All manufactured using electricity and then shipped to Cyprus using the most polluting heavy oil to power the ships...

Clean, renewable energy my arse! :lol:
User avatar
cyprusgrump
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8520
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Pissouri, Cyprus

Postby apc2010 » Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:35 pm

Even denmark have just cancelled plans for 3 offshore wind farms.
User avatar
apc2010
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2522
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:11 pm

Postby georgios100 » Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:39 pm

cyprusgrump wrote:
apc2010 wrote:denmark=6000 wind turbines
Denmark highest electric bill per person in europe
Denmark 6000 wind turbines total output for feb 2003 =ZERO

DEnmark 6000 wind turbines but no convential power plants shut.???


Quite so!

georgios100 says they get 20% of their power from wind... which means that not only has the consumer had to pay for 6,000 turbines but an additional 20% of conventional generating capacity sitting idle for when the wind stops...

On a yearly basis, Denmark produces 20% elec via windpower, not monthy. If the Danish government is asking for higher bills that does not mean the windmills are a failure. Cyprus elec bills not that much cheaper either.
I said it before, will say it again. Windpower is a great renewable source. Like all other renewables, not always there. Sorry guys, nature is not responsible for your 24 hrs air conditioning needs. As the oil gets depleted, the Danish will pay a lot less for electricity than anyone else. Candles to be a precious commodity as a result. Stock up from now... save money.

Your problem is short sided. You only look ahead for... next week. On the long term, things don't look that bright, do they?
User avatar
georgios100
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:21 pm
Location: Usa

Postby apc2010 » Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:52 pm

Denmark has the highest bills yet they are still subsidised by the companies building the turbines!!!!!
User avatar
apc2010
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2522
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:11 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest