DTA wrote:All that the people of the TRNC needs to do is work toward getting the ROC courts to the system they were designed to maintain by the 1960 constitution (turkish judges as well etc etc). I have been told that the reason that they dont do this is because they do not recognise the ROC... well the rest of the world does and if we are working toward a BBF then the idea of partition is dead so lets call the ROCs bluff, let us take our places in courts the government etc etc as was the agreement in 1960, if the TRNC is an illigal state already then what have we to lose... let us force the GC to chose to ignore the constitution and then challenge that in a higher court as well of the legitimacy of a government that 'ignores its own constitution.
Legal action will lead to legal action and the lawyers are the ones that will be laughing in the end,
Kikapu wrote:DTA wrote:All that the people of the TRNC needs to do is work toward getting the ROC courts to the system they were designed to maintain by the 1960 constitution (turkish judges as well etc etc). I have been told that the reason that they dont do this is because they do not recognise the ROC... well the rest of the world does and if we are working toward a BBF then the idea of partition is dead so lets call the ROCs bluff, let us take our places in courts the government etc etc as was the agreement in 1960, if the TRNC is an illigal state already then what have we to lose... let us force the GC to chose to ignore the constitution and then challenge that in a higher court as well of the legitimacy of a government that 'ignores its own constitution.
Legal action will lead to legal action and the lawyers are the ones that will be laughing in the end,
The only problem with your idea is, that since the "trnc" does not exist in the 1960 constitution, the TCs will need to abandon it first, allow all the GCs to return to their homes and land, as well as declare that Turkey is an occupying power in their country of Cyprus and demand their removal as they do not need saving from Turkey because everything is now hunky dory.!
DTA wrote:Kikapu wrote:DTA wrote:All that the people of the TRNC needs to do is work toward getting the ROC courts to the system they were designed to maintain by the 1960 constitution (turkish judges as well etc etc). I have been told that the reason that they dont do this is because they do not recognise the ROC... well the rest of the world does and if we are working toward a BBF then the idea of partition is dead so lets call the ROCs bluff, let us take our places in courts the government etc etc as was the agreement in 1960, if the TRNC is an illigal state already then what have we to lose... let us force the GC to chose to ignore the constitution and then challenge that in a higher court as well of the legitimacy of a government that 'ignores its own constitution.
Legal action will lead to legal action and the lawyers are the ones that will be laughing in the end,
The only problem with your idea is, that since the "trnc" does not exist in the 1960 constitution, the TCs will need to abandon it first, allow all the GCs to return to their homes and land, as well as declare that Turkey is an occupying power in their country of Cyprus and demand their removal as they do not need saving from Turkey because everything is now hunky dory.!
Not if it is done by individual people rather than the TRNC. Just like the Roc uses individual people rather than taking on Turkey directly
DTA wrote:Kikapu wrote:DTA wrote:All that the people of the TRNC needs to do is work toward getting the ROC courts to the system they were designed to maintain by the 1960 constitution (turkish judges as well etc etc). I have been told that the reason that they dont do this is because they do not recognise the ROC... well the rest of the world does and if we are working toward a BBF then the idea of partition is dead so lets call the ROCs bluff, let us take our places in courts the government etc etc as was the agreement in 1960, if the TRNC is an illigal state already then what have we to lose... let us force the GC to chose to ignore the constitution and then challenge that in a higher court as well of the legitimacy of a government that 'ignores its own constitution.
Legal action will lead to legal action and the lawyers are the ones that will be laughing in the end,
The only problem with your idea is, that since the "trnc" does not exist in the 1960 constitution, the TCs will need to abandon it first, allow all the GCs to return to their homes and land, as well as declare that Turkey is an occupying power in their country of Cyprus and demand their removal as they do not need saving from Turkey because everything is now hunky dory.!
Not if it is done by individual people rather than the TRNC. Just like the Roc uses individual people rather than taking on Turkey directly
DTA wrote:this is something that I am not sure 100% about but as the Roc says they represent the whole of cyprus then if the the TCs where ever they are living vote in a representative then does that not mean that this would be the representation of the tc community as in the '60 constitution (if of course they apply for this position- rather then what they are doing now)? I am asking because I dont know?
Also what I am suggesting is the bringing back the the Roc legal system to the 1960 status as is in the constitution, the other elements can wait for now.
Kikapu wrote:DTA wrote:this is something that I am not sure 100% about but as the Roc says they represent the whole of cyprus then if the the TCs where ever they are living vote in a representative then does that not mean that this would be the representation of the tc community as in the '60 constitution (if of course they apply for this position- rather then what they are doing now)? I am asking because I dont know?
Also what I am suggesting is the bringing back the the Roc legal system to the 1960 status as is in the constitution, the other elements can wait for now.
Fair enough, but the RoC can also use the 1960 constitution and declare all those against the state of the RoC as traitors and charge them as such for collaborating with the occupying force in Cyprus to form another state within a state, so you see, not everything is straight forward.!
Get Real! wrote:Kikapu wrote:DTA wrote:this is something that I am not sure 100% about but as the Roc says they represent the whole of cyprus then if the the TCs where ever they are living vote in a representative then does that not mean that this would be the representation of the tc community as in the '60 constitution (if of course they apply for this position- rather then what they are doing now)? I am asking because I dont know?
Also what I am suggesting is the bringing back the the Roc legal system to the 1960 status as is in the constitution, the other elements can wait for now.
Fair enough, but the RoC can also use the 1960 constitution and declare all those against the state of the RoC as traitors and charge them as such for collaborating with the occupying force in Cyprus to form another state within a state, so you see, not everything is straight forward.!
I'm glad there's a TC who reminds the remaining (and very foolish) TCs that a constitution is about privileges AND responsibilities!
Viewpoint wrote:Get Real! wrote:Kikapu wrote:DTA wrote:this is something that I am not sure 100% about but as the Roc says they represent the whole of cyprus then if the the TCs where ever they are living vote in a representative then does that not mean that this would be the representation of the tc community as in the '60 constitution (if of course they apply for this position- rather then what they are doing now)? I am asking because I dont know?
Also what I am suggesting is the bringing back the the Roc legal system to the 1960 status as is in the constitution, the other elements can wait for now.
Fair enough, but the RoC can also use the 1960 constitution and declare all those against the state of the RoC as traitors and charge them as such for collaborating with the occupying force in Cyprus to form another state within a state, so you see, not everything is straight forward.!
I'm glad there's a TC who reminds the remaining (and very foolish) TCs that a constitution is about privileges AND responsibilities!
Hes not a TC.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests