YFred wrote:denizaksulu wrote:One thing that they have agreed on is that, 'they have agreed on NOTHING'.!!
That's a contradiction is it not? If they agree that thay agree on nothing, then they surely agree on 1 nothing.
Don't you believe it Deniz, if there were no agreements, Why would UN ask for an anouncement.
Muhtar X has changed and has no wish to help Talat win. I suspect he has done a TPapa and is now against an agreement wishing to see Eroglu come to power, with him he thinks he can delay the agreement for ever.
There is a very good reason as to why Christofias does not want to give a joint statement on what has been agreed on so far, BECAUSE, it seems like what has been agreed to mostly has to do with power sharing, the rotating presidency and BBF concept, and from what the GCs see it, they see it all this as their compromise for a solution and yet nothing from the TC side for their compromise on property, settlers, and land adjustment, troops, Turkey's guarantees and so on, therefore, if a joint statement is given now, the TCs and the world will accept the GCs compromise as being set in stone and nothing from the other side, so, in the event the talks break off and another one starts in the future, everyone will expect the negotiations to start from what the GCs already agreed on, which will give the TCs the upper hand. No, I agree with Christofias, when everything is agreed on, good or bad, then let everyone show their hands.!