Erm, stumbled on this post from Bananiot that's posted in the ECHR thread in Chat and given that it relates some of the experiences of a claimant before Tnucland's ScabbyVision, and if he'll forgive me, think it belongs here for our deliberations, if any.
Quote:
The Demopoulos and others v Turkey decision of March 5 is a great deal more serious in a number of ways than anyone is prepared to acknowledge. The Court rejected every single argument of the Greek Cypriot side (GC) regarding the so called illegality of the Commission by reminding the applicants of its well known and consistent jurisprudence on the matter of exhaustion of domestic remedies and its clearly stated position in all the cases we consider as victories, i.e Fourth Interstate, Loizidou etc, that if and when Turkey introduces a domestic remedy in the north then they will examine it and determine its effectiveness. And then it went on to examine its effectiveness and found that indeed it os effective as there was no evidence to the contrary provided by the GC whereas Turkey had submitted a whole lot of settlements arrived at under the new law. And why did we not have any evidence?? Ahh that is because we refused and branded all who wished to go as traitors so that when it came to the hearing in Strasbourg we had nothing to show.
Almost 4 years ago I applied to the Commission, asking for the return of all my family’s property. I spent a considerable time and energy trying to force the Commission to consider my demands seriously and to follow appropriate procedures; finally I got them to hold hearings for the first time and to issue decisions. Having exhausted this remedy I have now taken all the material and submitted an application to the European Court of Human Rights. I can not tell what will happen there but I can tell that had more GC's applied properly and with the right legal advice and support and had seen the process through then we would have had a mass of evidence to argue , not that this is an illegal remedy but that this is an ineffective remedy. Politicians and lawyers are hugely responsible for this damning decision which has saddled us for the time being with a very bad remedy. In any other country in the civilised world , those directly in charge would have resigned by now and others would have been sacked, But in Cyprus the opposite happens, those responsible have come out attacking both the Court and the people who applied to it. It is at the very least shameful!
Eleni Meleagrou