Tim Drayton wrote:vaughanwilliams wrote:Bermuda is actually Britains oldest colony (1612) and can therefore be said to have benefitted from British influence the most. In 2005 it had the highest GDP per capita in the world with not a drop of oil or sniff of gas to its name.
These figures don't mean that much anyhow. I lived in Qatar, which has a sky high per capita GDP. All this means is that the ruling clan in this oil and gas rich feudal sheikhdom is super rich. Ordinary Qataris do not go hungry or unhoused, but that is about as much as you can say.
Well according to gergios100 they mean quite a lot.
He said:
"If the Brits cleared off totally from Cyprus in 1960 and the 1974 war never happened, Cyprus standard of living would have been much higher than any country in Europe."
God knows what he bases that on.
He also said:
"The Brits were an obstacle not aid in Cyprus development. I know of a dozen countries that did very well without any Brits around."
And I have just pointed out that Bermuda has had nearly 400 years of British rule and influence and is a much smaller island than Cyprus with a tiny population, in comparison.
Gerorgios100 knows of "a dozen countries that did very well without any Brits around."
I know a few countries that did very well out of the Brits: Canada, USA, Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Singapore.......