The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Can the ECHR ruling be challenged.

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby boomerang » Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:44 am

there was no un plan you moron that is why it was the annan plan... :lol:
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby Jerry » Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:50 am

YFred wrote:What if the Turkish actions so far and getting the agreement in 2004 is interpreated as good will and that flexibilty? Then what?


There was an agreement in 2004?

The Annan plan was changed several times in Turkey's favour and to the detriment of the GCs, I hardly call that as showing goodwill. And, of course, we keep being told future "offers" will not be as good as AP. Turkey seems intent on punishing Greek Cypriots for what has happened in the last 50 years.
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

Postby YFred » Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:51 am

boomerang wrote:there was no un plan you moron that is why it was the annan plan... :lol:

Did UN oppose it, was Annan not the head of UN?
Noticed you ignored the fact that EU and Greece supported it. The EU Rep in Cyprus during the vote was so upset about the lead up to the vote that he wanted to appear on TV and was not allowed. Get your stupid head out of the sand and sit you bum on it to, give it a rest.
Asshole.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby boomerang » Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:57 am

YFred wrote:
boomerang wrote:there was no un plan you moron that is why it was the annan plan... :lol:

Did UN oppose it, was Annan not the head of UN?
Noticed you ignored the fact that EU and Greece supported it. The EU Rep in CYprus during the vote was so upset about the lead up to the vote that he wanted to appear on TV and was not allowed. Get you stupid heat out of the sand and sit you bum on it to give it a rest.
Asshole.


:lol:... the EU said she will accomodate a solution prior of cyprus joining...these days that plan is a non starter as the EU...greece never backed the plan you moron they sat on the sidelines and left it to us, unlike turkey that was negotiating her own benefits at the back of the tcs...even the tc newspapers at the time were saying the plan failed before the ref...

man as i keep on saying comprehension and intelligence do not go hand in hand when it comes to you... :lol:

a border in urgently needed between your mouth and your bum... :lol:
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby YFred » Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:58 am

Jerry wrote:
YFred wrote:What if the Turkish actions so far and getting the agreement in 2004 is interpreated as good will and that flexibilty? Then what?


There was an agreement in 2004?

The Annan plan was changed several times in Turkey's favour and to the detriment of the GCs, I hardly call that as showing goodwill. And, of course, we keep being told future "offers" will not be as good as AP. Turkey seems intent on punishing Greek Cypriots for what has happened in the last 50 years.

Jerry that was the agreement. If the two sides did not come to an agreement, UN would fill in the gaps. That was agreed before negotiations.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby boomerang » Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:06 pm

YFred wrote:
Jerry wrote:
YFred wrote:What if the Turkish actions so far and getting the agreement in 2004 is interpreated as good will and that flexibilty? Then what?


There was an agreement in 2004?

The Annan plan was changed several times in Turkey's favour and to the detriment of the GCs, I hardly call that as showing goodwill. And, of course, we keep being told future "offers" will not be as good as AP. Turkey seems intent on punishing Greek Cypriots for what has happened in the last 50 years.

Jerry that was the agreement. If the two sides did not come to an agreement, UN would fill in the gaps. That was agreed before negotiations.


no knucklehead, annan will fill the gaps...also if it failed the ref was null and void...that was agreed...still spitting chips huh?...you think everyine is as dumb as you?... :lol:
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby YFred » Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:11 pm

boomerang wrote:
YFred wrote:
Jerry wrote:
YFred wrote:What if the Turkish actions so far and getting the agreement in 2004 is interpreated as good will and that flexibilty? Then what?


There was an agreement in 2004?

The Annan plan was changed several times in Turkey's favour and to the detriment of the GCs, I hardly call that as showing goodwill. And, of course, we keep being told future "offers" will not be as good as AP. Turkey seems intent on punishing Greek Cypriots for what has happened in the last 50 years.

Jerry that was the agreement. If the two sides did not come to an agreement, UN would fill in the gaps. That was agreed before negotiations.


no knucklehead, annan will fill the gaps...also if it failed the ref was null and void...that was agreed...still spitting chips huh?...you think everyine is as dumb as you?... :lol:

Answer the question asshole. Why did EU and Greece and UN sopport it?
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby umit07 » Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:13 pm

YFred wrote:
Jerry wrote:
YFred wrote:What if the Turkish actions so far and getting the agreement in 2004 is interpreated as good will and that flexibilty? Then what?


There was an agreement in 2004?

The Annan plan was changed several times in Turkey's favour and to the detriment of the GCs, I hardly call that as showing goodwill. And, of course, we keep being told future "offers" will not be as good as AP. Turkey seems intent on punishing Greek Cypriots for what has happened in the last 50 years.

Jerry that was the agreement. If the two sides did not come to an agreement, UN would fill in the gaps. That was agreed before negotiations.


The agreement was that if any of the two parties rejected the plan, it was worth as much as the toilet paper you wipe your ass with.

My personal opinion is that Tpap thought he could get a much better deal with the EU behind Cyprus so he just didn't give a shit.
User avatar
umit07
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2075
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:02 pm

Postby YFred » Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:15 pm

umit07 wrote:
YFred wrote:
Jerry wrote:
YFred wrote:What if the Turkish actions so far and getting the agreement in 2004 is interpreated as good will and that flexibilty? Then what?


There was an agreement in 2004?

The Annan plan was changed several times in Turkey's favour and to the detriment of the GCs, I hardly call that as showing goodwill. And, of course, we keep being told future "offers" will not be as good as AP. Turkey seems intent on punishing Greek Cypriots for what has happened in the last 50 years.

Jerry that was the agreement. If the two sides did not come to an agreement, UN would fill in the gaps. That was agreed before negotiations.


The agreement was that if any of the two parties rejected the plan, it was worth as much as the toilet paper you wipe your ass with.

My personal opinion is that Tpap thought he could get a much better deal with the EU behind Cyprus so he just didn't give a shit.

I see, you can fuck off too.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Jerry » Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:15 pm

YFred wrote:
Jerry wrote:
YFred wrote:What if the Turkish actions so far and getting the agreement in 2004 is interpreated as good will and that flexibilty? Then what?


There was an agreement in 2004?

The Annan plan was changed several times in Turkey's favour and to the detriment of the GCs, I hardly call that as showing goodwill. And, of course, we keep being told future "offers" will not be as good as AP. Turkey seems intent on punishing Greek Cypriots for what has happened in the last 50 years.

Jerry that was the agreement. If the two sides did not come to an agreement, UN would fill in the gaps. That was agreed before negotiations.



Fred, there is a clue in the title, the Annan PLAN. If both sides agreed to the plan , then by definition it would have become an agreement. As for the UN filling in the gaps, as I said previously gaps were filled at Turkey's insistence and in its favour.
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest