YFred wrote:What if the Turkish actions so far and getting the agreement in 2004 is interpreated as good will and that flexibilty? Then what?
boomerang wrote:there was no un plan you moron that is why it was the annan plan...
YFred wrote:boomerang wrote:there was no un plan you moron that is why it was the annan plan...
Did UN oppose it, was Annan not the head of UN?
Noticed you ignored the fact that EU and Greece supported it. The EU Rep in CYprus during the vote was so upset about the lead up to the vote that he wanted to appear on TV and was not allowed. Get you stupid heat out of the sand and sit you bum on it to give it a rest.
Asshole.
Jerry wrote:YFred wrote:What if the Turkish actions so far and getting the agreement in 2004 is interpreated as good will and that flexibilty? Then what?
There was an agreement in 2004?
The Annan plan was changed several times in Turkey's favour and to the detriment of the GCs, I hardly call that as showing goodwill. And, of course, we keep being told future "offers" will not be as good as AP. Turkey seems intent on punishing Greek Cypriots for what has happened in the last 50 years.
YFred wrote:Jerry wrote:YFred wrote:What if the Turkish actions so far and getting the agreement in 2004 is interpreated as good will and that flexibilty? Then what?
There was an agreement in 2004?
The Annan plan was changed several times in Turkey's favour and to the detriment of the GCs, I hardly call that as showing goodwill. And, of course, we keep being told future "offers" will not be as good as AP. Turkey seems intent on punishing Greek Cypriots for what has happened in the last 50 years.
Jerry that was the agreement. If the two sides did not come to an agreement, UN would fill in the gaps. That was agreed before negotiations.
boomerang wrote:YFred wrote:Jerry wrote:YFred wrote:What if the Turkish actions so far and getting the agreement in 2004 is interpreated as good will and that flexibilty? Then what?
There was an agreement in 2004?
The Annan plan was changed several times in Turkey's favour and to the detriment of the GCs, I hardly call that as showing goodwill. And, of course, we keep being told future "offers" will not be as good as AP. Turkey seems intent on punishing Greek Cypriots for what has happened in the last 50 years.
Jerry that was the agreement. If the two sides did not come to an agreement, UN would fill in the gaps. That was agreed before negotiations.
no knucklehead, annan will fill the gaps...also if it failed the ref was null and void...that was agreed...still spitting chips huh?...you think everyine is as dumb as you?...
YFred wrote:Jerry wrote:YFred wrote:What if the Turkish actions so far and getting the agreement in 2004 is interpreated as good will and that flexibilty? Then what?
There was an agreement in 2004?
The Annan plan was changed several times in Turkey's favour and to the detriment of the GCs, I hardly call that as showing goodwill. And, of course, we keep being told future "offers" will not be as good as AP. Turkey seems intent on punishing Greek Cypriots for what has happened in the last 50 years.
Jerry that was the agreement. If the two sides did not come to an agreement, UN would fill in the gaps. That was agreed before negotiations.
umit07 wrote:YFred wrote:Jerry wrote:YFred wrote:What if the Turkish actions so far and getting the agreement in 2004 is interpreated as good will and that flexibilty? Then what?
There was an agreement in 2004?
The Annan plan was changed several times in Turkey's favour and to the detriment of the GCs, I hardly call that as showing goodwill. And, of course, we keep being told future "offers" will not be as good as AP. Turkey seems intent on punishing Greek Cypriots for what has happened in the last 50 years.
Jerry that was the agreement. If the two sides did not come to an agreement, UN would fill in the gaps. That was agreed before negotiations.
The agreement was that if any of the two parties rejected the plan, it was worth as much as the toilet paper you wipe your ass with.
My personal opinion is that Tpap thought he could get a much better deal with the EU behind Cyprus so he just didn't give a shit.
YFred wrote:Jerry wrote:YFred wrote:What if the Turkish actions so far and getting the agreement in 2004 is interpreated as good will and that flexibilty? Then what?
There was an agreement in 2004?
The Annan plan was changed several times in Turkey's favour and to the detriment of the GCs, I hardly call that as showing goodwill. And, of course, we keep being told future "offers" will not be as good as AP. Turkey seems intent on punishing Greek Cypriots for what has happened in the last 50 years.
Jerry that was the agreement. If the two sides did not come to an agreement, UN would fill in the gaps. That was agreed before negotiations.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest