Cyprus-Forum.com

[saurkraut]

A Bit of bedtime reading.

looked up at the Northern Lots forum and like them nice people and found this little article. Hey you lot were not the nice innocent butter wouldn't melt in your mouth wounded badly done to tribe that you have been telling the world, are you??? Tut Tut you bad people.

http://www.parliamentarybrief.com/artic ... if-no.html

[Sotos]

By Michael Stephen

Isn't this the guy who was paid by Denktash to write Turkish propaganda several years ago? He is till on the Turkish payroll?

[RichardB]

By Michael Stephen

Isn't this the guy who was paid by Denktash to write Turkish propaganda several years ago? He is till on the Turkish payroll?

Exactly Sotos

If you Google the 2 names You will find a massive collaberation between the 2 of them

Another TC credible source I guess

BTW Michael Stephen was also involved in the British war memorial in Kyrenia...Thats how credible the article is

[GreekForumer]

Guys, instead of dismissing the article as propaganda, have a go at challenging the statements he makes. Add some value to the thread.

[DT.]

Guys, instead of dismissing the article as propaganda, have a go at challenging the statements he makes. Add some value to the thread.

If you want to debate every article Michael Stephen the famous cross-dressing former tory MP ever wrote aginst Cyprus then good luck to you. The man is an employee of Denktash.

[YFred]

By Michael Stephen

Isn't this the guy who was paid by Denktash to write Turkish propaganda several years ago? He is till on the Turkish payroll?

Exactly Sotos

If you Google the 2 names You will find a massive collaberation between the 2 of them

Another TC credible source I guess

BTW Michael Stephen was also involved in the British war memorial in Kyrenia...Thats how credible the article is

Credibility my arse. Argue against points he makes and knock em down if you can.
Come on DT you are the T-Rex of the political world, tear it appart if you can.

[Oracle]

Michael Stephens is free to have his opinion. But it's not based on facts, just impressions formed from the people who pay him and with whom he mostly associates. I don't think anyone of any worth will take him seriously as he wasn't even able to garner government approval for the "Memorial" he used to further his propaganda purposes.

As such, he really is no more worthy of discussion than any other Turkish peasant paid by the Turks to say "I Love Turks"

[YFred]

Michael Stephens is free to have his opinion. But it's not based on facts, just impressions formed from the people who pay him and with whom he mostly associates. I don't think anyone of any worth will take him seriously as he wasn't even able to garner government approval for the "Memorial" he used to further his propaganda purposes.

As such, he really is no more worthy of discussion than any other Turkish peasant paid by the Turks to say "I Love Turks"

I see you have not tackled a single point that he has made. You are such a good bullshitting master debater dearest. Only second to our real master debaters DT and GR. DIY merchants.

[Oracle]

Michael Stephens is free to have his opinion. But it's not based on facts, just impressions formed from the people who pay him and with whom he mostly associates. I don't think anyone of any worth will take him seriously as he wasn't even able to garner government approval for the "Memorial" he used to further his propaganda purposes.

As such, he really is no more worthy of discussion than any other Turkish peasant paid by the Turks to say "I Love Turks"

I see you have not tackled a single point that he has made. You are such a good bullshitting master debater dearest. Only second to our real master debaters DT and GR. DIY merchants.

I said they are his opinion, to which he is 'entitled'.

I'll discuss facts, but I'm not interested in his (paid) opinion, and I further qualified that with an example!

Now piss off!

[YFred]

Michael Stephens is free to have his opinion. But it's not based on facts, just impressions formed from the people who pay him and with whom he mostly associates. I don't think anyone of any worth will take him seriously as he wasn't even able to garner government approval for the "Memorial" he used to further his propaganda purposes.

As such, he really is no more worthy of discussion than any other Turkish peasant paid by the Turks to say "I Love Turks"

I see you have not tackled a single point that he has made. You are such a good bullshitting master debater dearest. Only second to our real master debaters DT and GR. DIY merchants.

I said they are his opinion, to which he is 'entitled'.

I'll discuss facts, but I'm not interested in his (paid) opinion, and I further qualified that with an example!

Now piss off!

At least do the decent thing and knock one of his points off, my dearest master debater.