CopperLine wrote:What is your problem GetReal ? The ECHR is a convention of international law. The Court created by the ECHR is a juridical body of international law. What can you mean that the ECHR 'cannot do anything about it' ? ECHR is no less international law than UN Security Council resolutions (and many legal scholars and practitioners would argue that it is far more international law than UNSC resolutions).
And then as if to compound mistakes with ignorance you, who keep going on about UN resolutions and the importance of complying with international law say that RoC "is indeed the ONLY authority that can validate land and property", when the very fact that Cypriots, GC and TC have taken cases to ECJ and ECHR on property issues is manifest evidence that RoC does not have the final legal say on these matters. Unless, that is, you think that RoC should breach its treaty commitments and break international law ?
Thanks copperline - some sense at last.
The only way the RoC could be free of ECHR jurisdiction would be to leave the CoE, which in turn would be I believe a breach of it EU accession terms, so they copuld leave the EU as well. Then its true the ECHR could not force you to do anything.
Good luck with that one GR.