Cyprus-Forum.com

[B25]

I will say this again. In order for Turkey to provide evidence that the IPC is a competent remedy they have had to admit in court that it is an internal Turkish govt institution.

By doing this they have effectively in the eyes of the ECHR (un)recognised the "trnc" themselves.

Thank you sir!

[Kikapu]

I will say this again. In order for Turkey to provide evidence that the IPC is a competent remedy they have had to admit in court that it is an internal Turkish govt institution.

By doing this they have effectively in the eyes of the ECHR (un)recognised the "trnc" themselves.

In another words, DT, as soon as there is a settlement, the IPC will dissolve, since Turkey will no longer be the occupying power in the north, which at that point, the laws of the RoC/ BBF government would take over regardless of what the ECHR had said in their decision few days ago. Therefore, all those who thinks that they do not have to return the GCs properties back after a settlement are just dreaming.

[DTA]

I will say this again. In order for Turkey to provide evidence that the IPC is a competent remedy they have had to admit in court that it is an internal Turkish govt institution.

By doing this they have effectively in the eyes of the ECHR (un)recognised the "trnc" themselves.

In another words, DT, as soon as there is a settlement, the IPC will dissolve, since Turkey will no longer be the occupying power in the north, which at that point, the laws of the RoC/ BBF government would take over regardless of what the ECHR had said in their decision few days ago. Therefore, all those who thinks that they do not have to return the GCs properties back after a settlement are just dreaming.

You think that is not part of the talks?