In one of the links to C44 in the topic below a carpet bagger posted that she thought she was safe since the judgment stated :
"In the light of the many changes some 35 years after the properties were left, it would risk being arbitrary and injudicious for the Court to impose an obligation to effect restitution in all cases – which would result in the forcible eviction and rehousing of many men, women and children – even with the aim of vindicating the rights of victims of violations of the Convention"
The ECHR gives a shit about a carpet bagger's el cheapo exohiko.
It is raining anvils and this is what the protect property speculators are using for umbrellas.
I cannot wait to meet my new choryianoi. Thkiallon ton mavron.