DTA wrote:What this actually means for all the gc that lost land, is that you have a legally recognised effective way of either getting the return of your land compensation for it, exchange or a mixture of all three,
this is great for gc refugees, don't buy in to the nationalist bullshit - why should you suffer and be deprived of what is yours while the politicians serve their own purposes and can't agree to anything after 35 years of talks.
If there was anything like this in the south I would definately take the issue of my familys property up with them
Kifeas wrote:DTA wrote:What this actually means for all the gc that lost land, is that you have a legally recognised effective way of either getting the return of your land compensation for it, exchange or a mixture of all three,
this is great for gc refugees, don't buy in to the nationalist bullshit - why should you suffer and be deprived of what is yours while the politicians serve their own purposes and can't agree to anything after 35 years of talks.
If there was anything like this in the south I would definately take the issue of my familys property up with them
DTA, do you seriously believe this nonsense, especially after yesterday's ruling? Have you seen some of the "settlements" this "IPC" has come up with so far, mainly because those that applied to it were cases of economically devastated and desperate individuals inclined to have accept just about anything that would have been made available to them? Do you seriously believe that Turkey will ever dig into its pocket so deep and take out the several tens of billions of Euros that are required in order to properly and adequately compensate the GCs?
SKI-preo wrote:I personally do not care where I get justice from as long as it is indeed justice. Does the commission have a website in Greek? Are claimants self represented or are they entitled to legal representation?If we are entitled to representation are we limited to Turkish speaking lawyers or are the hearings bilingual. The forum has been described as a"commission" not a "court" so does this mean it lacks jurisdiction to make binding rulings and is this a way of sidestepping a legal analysis of the conduct of the Turkish Army.I have several properties maybe I want to sell some keep some can this be done through this bordello? What happens if my entire town insists on restitution. the ridiculous situation will arise if we are restituted where we will be a 100% Greek Cypriot town with no voting rights or the entitlement to run candidates in elections. So many questions. From what I have read the commission has pumped the decisions through reasonably fast up until now. What happens now that the commission has no incentive to move quickly?
Kifeas wrote:Even in case anyone would have been in doubt that the ECtHR ruling was a purely politically motivated one, Mt. Talat has already given it out. In comments he made on Turkish NTV news network, he admitted he called president Gul, as soon as the ruling came out, and thanked him for the personal "initiatives" he took in order for this victorious ruling to become a reality. Since when a court decision requires the personal initiative and influence of the president of the defendant country, in order to turn victorious? What are these "personal initiatives" that president Gul took? Why doesn't Talat let us know?
DT. wrote:The fact is that Turkey admitted that the IPC is a Turkish remedy and not a "trnc" remedy. Therefore since the IPC is a Turkish governmental mechanism then the admittance that the effective administration in the north is Turkey follows due to the illegal occupation.
As Achilleas Demetriades stated last night, Turkey has effectively reversed its recognition of the "trnc" last night and addmitted it is the authority for people to go to due to Turkey's actions of invasion and occupation of property.
As far as the ECHR is concerned, the "trnc" is no longer a pseudostate but an occupation regime ran by Turkey.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests