Get Real! wrote:You'll have to clarify this Erol with examples because I can't imagine how someone has had their property "returned" in the occupied territory!
You can lol all you like but the fact remain the same. You can goto the IPC website and see exactly where restituion has been the agrred settlement in cases to date just as you can see where comensation in money or exchange land has been. Its all there and publicaly viewable.
Get Real! wrote:And what's all this about "categories"??? You have much to disclose here Erol!
Read the ECHR ruling on the IPC. Its all there in black and white. There can be no blanket return of all property to all who want such. Return of property or not depends on the status of a given property. If return will cause new undue hardships then compensation and only compensation is a valid legal and justified means of redress. This is what the ECHR has said.
Get Real! wrote:It’s most entertaining that Turkey has illegally invaded and occupied 37% of Cyprus and here we are today listening to “Turkish Cypriots” blaming Cyprus of invading and occupying Cyprus!
It actually has nothing to do with if you are an 'occupying power' or a 'legitimate government'. Whatever you are the ECHR is concerned with the denial of peoples human rights. Neither an 'occupying power' or a 'legitimate government' can denies peoples rights to their property. The RoC has been doing this just as Turkey has and the ECHR is concerned with the denail of the indviduals rights and not what the status of the 'deniee' may be.