The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


ECHR Decision, what does it mean?

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby erolz3 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:43 am

Get Real! wrote:You'll have to clarify this Erol with examples because I can't imagine how someone has had their property "returned" in the occupied territory! :lol:


You can lol all you like but the fact remain the same. You can goto the IPC website and see exactly where restituion has been the agrred settlement in cases to date just as you can see where comensation in money or exchange land has been. Its all there and publicaly viewable.

Get Real! wrote:And what's all this about "categories"??? You have much to disclose here Erol! :lol:


Read the ECHR ruling on the IPC. Its all there in black and white. There can be no blanket return of all property to all who want such. Return of property or not depends on the status of a given property. If return will cause new undue hardships then compensation and only compensation is a valid legal and justified means of redress. This is what the ECHR has said.

Get Real! wrote:It’s most entertaining that Turkey has illegally invaded and occupied 37% of Cyprus and here we are today listening to “Turkish Cypriots” blaming Cyprus of invading and occupying Cyprus! :lol:


It actually has nothing to do with if you are an 'occupying power' or a 'legitimate government'. Whatever you are the ECHR is concerned with the denial of peoples human rights. Neither an 'occupying power' or a 'legitimate government' can denies peoples rights to their property. The RoC has been doing this just as Turkey has and the ECHR is concerned with the denail of the indviduals rights and not what the status of the 'deniee' may be.
erolz3
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 435
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:35 am

Postby Get Real! » Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:57 am

erolz3 wrote:
Get Real! wrote:You'll have to clarify this Erol with examples because I can't imagine how someone has had their property "returned" in the occupied territory! :lol:


You can lol all you like but the fact remain the same. You can goto the IPC website and see exactly where restituion has been the agrred settlement in cases to date just as you can see where comensation in money or exchange land has been. Its all there and publicaly viewable.

Get Real! wrote:And what's all this about "categories"??? You have much to disclose here Erol! :lol:


Read the ECHR ruling on the IPC. Its all there in black and white. There can be no blanket return of all property to all who want such. Return of property or not depends on the status of a given property. If return will cause new undue hardships then compensation and only compensation is a valid legal and justified means of redress. This is what the ECHR has said.

Get Real! wrote:It’s most entertaining that Turkey has illegally invaded and occupied 37% of Cyprus and here we are today listening to “Turkish Cypriots” blaming Cyprus of invading and occupying Cyprus! :lol:


It actually has nothing to do with if you are an 'occupying power' or a 'legitimate government'. Whatever you are the ECHR is concerned with the denial of peoples human rights. Neither an 'occupying power' or a 'legitimate government' can denies peoples rights to their property. The RoC has been doing this just as Turkey has and the ECHR is concerned with the denail of the indviduals rights and not what the status of the 'deniee' may be.

Why don’t you give us a link to this website and direct us to the exact location where it claims that a Greek Cypriot has had their property "returned" in the occupied territory!

Actually, this is worthy of a dedicated thread don't you think? :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby erolz3 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:02 am

Get Real! wrote:Why don’t you give us a link to this website and direct us to the exact location where it claims that a Greek Cypriot has had their property "returned" in the occupied territory!

Actually, this is worthy of a dedicated thread don't you think? :lol:


Its not that hard to find but for you GR

http://www.kuzeykibristmk.org/english/istatistik.html
erolz3
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 435
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:35 am

Postby boulio » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:22 am

not much of return of land heavily compensation and at what price and many withdrawls
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby Piratis » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:23 am

erolz3 wrote:
Get Real! wrote:These “mechanisms” you talk about are only good for those who no longer care about owning their property and just want to sell it and cash in!


This is just not true GR. The IPC can and has returned property where it can under its terms of operation. If your property is of a category that can be returned than the IPC will return it. If it is not in that category not only will the IPC not return it but neither will the ECHR.


This is an absurd conclusion. If this was the case then there wouldn't be a need for a ECHR, since all cases could be settled fairly at the local level.

Turkey is one of the countries with the most convictions at the ECHR (even for cases not related to Cyprus), something which clearly shows that the Turkish courts are not able to offer justice even to their own citizens, let alone to do this to their hated enemies.

Furthermore, when Cyprus is liberated neither the "IPC" nor ECHR will be needed to decide what can be returned and what can not. And until that happens our refugees can be compensated for the loss of use of their properties by suing TCs and foreigners for trespass in the courts of Cyprus.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby aussieturk » Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:28 am

Piratis wrote: Furthermore, when Cyprus is liberated neither the "IPC" nor ECHR will be needed to decide what can be returned and what can not. And until that happens our refugees can be compensated for the loss of use of their properties by suing TCs and foreigners for trespass in the courts of Cyprus.


and vica versa :wink:
User avatar
aussieturk
Member
Member
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:19 am

Postby erolz3 » Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:11 am

Piratis wrote:This is an absurd conclusion. If this was the case then there wouldn't be a need for a ECHR, since all cases could be settled fairly at the local level.


Indeed this is the situation for property in the North. It can be settled via a local remedy. The ECHR only role now is to ensure that hsi local remedy continues to be sufficent to meet the requirments on Turkey with regards to indivduals human rights re property.

Piratis wrote:Furthermore, when Cyprus is liberated neither the "IPC" nor ECHR will be needed to decide what can be returned and what can not. And until that happens our refugees can be compensated for the loss of use of their properties by suing TCs and foreigners for trespass in the courts of Cyprus.


It is your choice if you wish to wait for some mythical 'liberation' of Cyprus and in the mean time seek what monies you can from trespass cases in the RoC courts against users of property and not Turkey vs gaining back your property now if possible or taking compensation now or later if not. Will you provide the same choice for TC with property in the South ? Every indication is that eventualy you will be forced to do so but you will delay and provaricate as much as possible untill then, much as Turkey has done.

The numbers of people who have settled via the IPC is indeed so far very low compared to those who are eligable to claim, but still significantly higher so far than the number who have taken the route of waiting for 'liberation' whilst seeking monies for trespass in the mean time, which currently stand at 1 person.
erolz3
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 435
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:35 am

Postby Gasman » Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:22 am

Why don’t you give us a link to this website and direct us to the exact location where it claims that a Greek Cypriot has had their property "returned" in the occupied territory!


I am amazed that anyone who holds such strong views and has so much to say on the subject of GC property in the North and this Immovable Property Commission has never even looked at their website (nor, it seems, even aware that it exists)!

Even without someone 'giving you the link' you could have found it yourself at any time by just googling 'Immovable Property Commission'. It will appear right up at the top of the page.

I'd have thought you'd be checking it daily. Especially if you want to refute any matters relating to it!
Gasman
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3561
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 6:18 pm

Postby Acikgoz » Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:13 am

Get Real! wrote:
GCs have been praying that the EU can not only give them the whole island on a unitary basis, but have Turkey pay for the priviledge.

The whole island belongs to the RoC so what are you on about?


The land is supposed to belong to the "people of Cyprus", not the RoC nor the "GCs" that's why there is a partition now - surely that should be your basis as a pleader of human rights with relation to property.

Pipi, you can sit there and deny TCs suffering as you forced them out of their govt and continued to isolate them even back in the 60s.
Lying cheating GC.
User avatar
Acikgoz
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:09 pm
Location: Where all activities are embargoed

Postby Malapapa » Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:22 am

Get Real! wrote:
Oracle wrote:Sorry, Malapapa, but this all sounds like complying with the occupier.

He’s really pushing hard with “guarantors” all the time that it makes one wonder where he’s really coming from! :lol:


:roll: It's the Bonnie and Clyde show again...
User avatar
Malapapa
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:13 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests