We do not trust the EU with our security.
what about a joint EU/nATO FORCE with turkish,greek,cypriot participation?
4,000 men
8 battalions of 500 men
four eu/nato countries battalions
2 cypriot,one turkish,one greek
boulio wrote:We do not trust the EU with our security.
what about a joint EU/nATO FORCE with turkish,greek,cypriot participation?
4,000 men
8 battalions of 500 men
four eu/nato countries battalions
2 cypriot,one turkish,one greek
Viewpoint wrote:georgios100 wrote:Viewpoint wrote:georgios100 wrote:Guys, Guys... now listen
Why don't we look at Europe as a guarantor! Let's put Russia, USA, Chine aside for now.
Europe can assemble a force from a blend of it's members (Swedish, Finnish, Danish etc) and assign them in 4-6 sectors of the island to keep the peace.
What better guarantor than Europe it self. After all, Cyprus is European land now!!! Perhaps Europe can pick-up the bill too or part of it.
Why would Turkey intervene? The European troops can handle it!!!
Security for all Cypriots is done. Move on to the next issue please...
Georgios100
We do not trust the EU with our security.
Viewpoint, this is your personal opinion... yes? I am sure other TC's may not share this. Your leaders may not agree with you either.
You want to join EU but don't trust EU? Turkey wants to join the EU but don't trust the EU? I don't get it... Am I missing something here? Later, when Turkey joins the EU will dare to invade Cyprus again? In essence, invade Europe? Do you think Europe is going to stand idle to this action?
Be serious. If you want to join EU you must trust EU. The European force stationed in Cyprus will guarantee real and unbiased security, will not take sides or discriminate amongst Cypriots.
Think "European" when trying to become European...
Georgios100
Do you know the difference between economic stability and security? they are two totally different issues. The EU doesn't even have an army or any mechanism that could or would intervene in times of crisis. (Plus I am not personally a fan of the EU).
observer wrote:Turkey is a member of NATO. Article 5 of the NATO Treaty says:
"The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area."
If Russia "intervenes" in Turkey, the rest of NATO is treaty bound to take action against Russia to restore and secure Turkey's borders.
If that were not enough, Russia already has enough problems with Moslems that it retained within its borders on the breakup of the Soviet Union, so probably wouldn't want to take on any more.
paliometoxo wrote:last time un had to aprove? how much did that stop turkey
Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote:I agree each side should be allowed to choose their own guarantor country.
Brilliant. I choose all five permanent members of the UNSC to guarantee Cyprus against Turkey. But failing that I'd live with just Russia, which shares a border with Turkey, has interests in Cyprus, and who would relish the opportunity to kick Turkey's butt if it ever Turkey dared to over-step the mark in Cyprus again.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest