Viewpoint wrote:Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote:If Im using agression against GCs what good would Russia going into Turkey do when there is no problem in Turkey? we would jus continue. The whole idea of guarantees is to step in and resolve matters here on the island the point you are trying to make does not hold water, the guarantees are for the island and each chosen guarantor can only have equal rights to intervene in the state they guarantee.
Free Cypriots don't need any guarantees on their own island. They feel safe on their island.
They need guarantees against a known foreign invader: Turkey. And if Russia can intervene in Turkey, Turkey will think twice before intervening again in Cyprus. Don't you want free Cypriots to feel safe?
Now you ae being silly what good would Russian intervention so in Turkey when the problems would be erupting here, would Russia allow Turkey intervention rights to Russia?
What for?
Viewpoint wrote:me thinks not so you can only have a guarantor that will intervene here on the island anything else is ridiculous, I am not denying you this right why do you wnat to deny me?
I'm not. I'm saying Turkey can have intervention rights in Cyprus if Russia has the same rights in Turkey to curb Turkish aggression. Why do you want to deny me?
Viewpoint wrote:The protection cannot be lop sided if your choice is Russia and ours Turkey they they both have equal rights to intervene here on the island in a time of crisis.
No. Cypriots don't need Russia in Cyprus. Cypriots don't need any foreign armies on Cyprus. The offer is this: Turkey has the right to intervene in Cyprus, only if Russia has the right to intervene in Turkey. To make Cypriots feel safe that Turkey won't abuse her power.
Alternatively, Turkey doesn't have the right to intervene in Cyprus, and Russia doesn't have the right to intervene in Turkey. Which is even more preferable.