The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Guarantees - a suggestion...

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Get Real! » Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:58 pm

Malapapa wrote:
Get Real! wrote:This talk about Russia becoming a guarantor or getting embroiled in the CypProb is dumb and a total waste of time debating! :roll:


No more dumb than insisting on having Turkey as a guarantor...

Do you honestly think that a BBF/BBC will ever come about and you're worrying about guarantors? :roll:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Malapapa » Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:06 pm

Get Real! wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
Get Real! wrote:This talk about Russia becoming a guarantor or getting embroiled in the CypProb is dumb and a total waste of time debating! :roll:


No more dumb than insisting on having Turkey as a guarantor...

Do you honestly think that a BBF/BBC will ever come about and you're worrying about guarantors? :roll:


No. And the dumb guarantor issue is certainly one deal breaker.
User avatar
Malapapa
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:13 pm

Postby Byron » Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:29 pm

To accept any form of guarantee from anycountry implies that there is no real wish for unity in Cyprus. 36 years of division tells the truth.
Byron
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 5:53 pm

Postby B25 » Sat Mar 06, 2010 9:45 pm

Byron wrote:To accept any form of guarantee from anycountry implies that there is no real wish for unity in Cyprus. 36 years of division tells the truth.


Agreed! Please tell that to the MF Turks who are insisting on having the invader guarantee us. You might as well put the fox to guard the chickens FFS.
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6543
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Postby Viewpoint » Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:11 pm

guAratees are a deterrant and will ensure both sides to the agreement.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby kurupetos » Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:30 pm

Viewpoint wrote:guAratees are a deterrant and will ensure both sides to the agreement.


Been there, seen that, done that. No, thanks.
User avatar
kurupetos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18855
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Cyprus

Postby Kikapu » Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:47 pm

Viewpoint wrote:guAratees are a deterrant and will ensure both sides to the agreement.


Unfortunately, Turkey has a bad record of being a guarantor, therefore she can't be trusted to do the right thing. The same goes to Greece and Britain. Using the past experience of guarantors, say Turkey's for instance, it will embolden the fascists and the NeoPartitionists from the north to cause trouble just to invite Turkey to come and divide the island again, except this time, the state lines would have been already drawn in a BBF agreement, and a member of the EU, the north can then declare to become an independent state. So in short, guarantorship is not a deterrent, but an invitation to divide the island, trouble caused by the Fascist NeoPartitionist. That is the reason why the GCs will not agree to Turkeys guardianship, because Turkey was supposed to be a guarantor to all Cypriots, but turns out, they only been a guarantor to occupying north of the island in the name of the TCs, or more commonly known today as the "Turks of Cyprus". Sorry VP, but you are not going to convince the GCs to accept Turkey after all she done in Cyprus, and all that she did not do, that she should have done. All the Fascist NeoPartitionists can't wait to have the GCs agree for Turkey to be a guarantor so that they can go and blow up their own kids schools and put the blame on the Gcs, just to invite Turkey to come in. That game has already been played and everyone can see right through the Fascist NeoPartitionist.
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby GreekForumer » Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:08 pm

Viewpoint wrote:guAratees are a deterrant and will ensure both sides to the agreement.


We are all quite happy for TCs to have a guarantor but we insist TCs choose a guarantor that does not have a history of Genocide against Christians.
GreekForumer
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 288
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:46 am
Location: Australia

Postby DTA » Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:22 pm

Kikapu wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:guAratees are a deterrant and will ensure both sides to the agreement.


Unfortunately, Turkey has a bad record of being a guarantor, therefore she can't be trusted to do the right thing. The same goes to Greece and Britain. Using the past experience of guarantors, say Turkey's for instance, it will embolden the fascists and the NeoPartitionists from the north to cause trouble just to invite Turkey to come and divide the island again, except this time, the state lines would have been already drawn in a BBF agreement, and a member of the EU, the north can then declare to become an independent state. So in short, guarantorship is not a deterrent, but an invitation to divide the island, trouble caused by the Fascist NeoPartitionist. That is the reason why the GCs will not agree to Turkeys guardianship, because Turkey was supposed to be a guarantor to all Cypriots, but turns out, they only been a guarantor to occupying north of the island in the name of the TCs, or more commonly known today as the "Turks of Cyprus". Sorry VP, but you are not going to convince the GCs to accept Turkey after all she done in Cyprus, and all that she did not do, that she should have done. All the Fascist NeoPartitionists can't wait to have the GCs agree for Turkey to be a guarantor so that they can go and blow up their own kids schools and put the blame on the Gcs, just to invite Turkey to come in. That game has already been played and everyone can see right through the Fascist NeoPartitionist.


what are you talking about? Seriously you are a disgrace more balanced views are presented by gc, what evidence do you base the rubbish you write?

Riddle me this: what does turkey get from 'having' the north of Cyprus?
DTA
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:25 pm
Location: LONDON

Postby Viewpoint » Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:13 am

kurupetos wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:guAratees are a deterrant and will ensure both sides to the agreement.


Been there, seen that, done that. No, thanks.


You have no choice, if the TCs called your bluff and returned to the 1960 agreements the guarantees would still be in place.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests