The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Bananiots fair and balanced view

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Re: Bananiots fair and balanced view

Postby BirKibrisli » Mon Mar 01, 2010 8:52 am

Get Real! wrote:
BirKibrisli wrote:Turkey would leave Cyprus in the sense that she will withdraw her troops IF a comprehensive solution is agreed to...Cyprus is not an economic investment but a drain for Turkey...She would continue to exert political influence in the North for a considerable period given the past 35 years...That is only natural and not to be scared of..

And that's why we can NEVER afford to let it happen... :wink:

It’s what I keep saying… you’re no good for Cyprus but trouble, so it’s best for Cyprus that you gradually disappear among the remaining 70 million foreigners to remove the Turkish excuse.

Ta-ta! :lol:


And you believe that if the TCs disappear amongst the 70 Million Turks Turkey will just get up and leave the North???? If you do,I have only one advice :GET YOUR HEAD EXAMINED... :)
User avatar
BirKibrisli
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Bananiots fair and balanced view

Postby Get Real! » Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:20 am

BirKibrisli wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
BirKibrisli wrote:Turkey would leave Cyprus in the sense that she will withdraw her troops IF a comprehensive solution is agreed to...Cyprus is not an economic investment but a drain for Turkey...She would continue to exert political influence in the North for a considerable period given the past 35 years...That is only natural and not to be scared of..

And that's why we can NEVER afford to let it happen... :wink:

It’s what I keep saying… you’re no good for Cyprus but trouble, so it’s best for Cyprus that you gradually disappear among the remaining 70 million foreigners to remove the Turkish excuse.

Ta-ta! :lol:

And you believe that if the TCs disappear amongst the 70 Million Turks Turkey will just get up and leave the North???? If you do,I have only one advice :GET YOUR HEAD EXAMINED... :)

Once the TCs have been assimilated with the remaining 70m Turks, the CyProb becomes a straightforward international Cyprus vs Turkey dispute that is much easier to handle as opposed to an internal community issue!
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Re: Bananiots fair and balanced view

Postby YFred » Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:33 am

Get Real! wrote:
BirKibrisli wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
BirKibrisli wrote:Turkey would leave Cyprus in the sense that she will withdraw her troops IF a comprehensive solution is agreed to...Cyprus is not an economic investment but a drain for Turkey...She would continue to exert political influence in the North for a considerable period given the past 35 years...That is only natural and not to be scared of..

And that's why we can NEVER afford to let it happen... :wink:

It’s what I keep saying… you’re no good for Cyprus but trouble, so it’s best for Cyprus that you gradually disappear among the remaining 70 million foreigners to remove the Turkish excuse.

Ta-ta! :lol:

And you believe that if the TCs disappear amongst the 70 Million Turks Turkey will just get up and leave the North???? If you do,I have only one advice :GET YOUR HEAD EXAMINED... :)

Once the TCs have been assimilated with the remaining 70m Turks, the CyProb becomes a straightforward international Cyprus vs Turkey dispute that is much easier to handle as opposed to an internal community issue!
:wink: :wink:
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby DT. » Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:00 pm

Bananiot wrote:Talikser, do you agree with DT's assertion that I have said that the innocent GC dead "deserved to die"? He put the words under inverted commas, implying that I wrote such things. If you do, since you quoted DT, please show me where I said this. If not, you might like to retract your assertion that I focus on only one portion of the dataset. If not, that is okay, I can live with it.



Apologies for dropping the bomb with this thread and then leaving it but I'm on the road again.

Now whats all this nonsense about lawsuits Bananiot?

Bananiot wrote:At the end we were very lucky to get what we got, but being greedy and spoilt, we started a war on the London-Zurich agreements and the results are well known. We allowed the nationalists to dominate us. We never held our ground. May be we deserve what came to us.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Bananiot » Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:46 pm

DT, where did I say "innocent dead GC's deserved to die"? You need to come clean on this one and I can wait for your response for as long as you like.

You have quoted the following I wrote:

"At the end we were very lucky to get what we got, but being greedy and spoilt, we started a war on the London-Zurich agreements and the results are well known. We allowed the nationalists to dominate us. We never held our ground. May be we deserve what came to us".

The above is a criticism directed at rational people who allowed the fanatics to destroy Cyprus by remaining silent when they should have stood up and be counted.

You also jumped on the lawsuit wagon, hastely, like all those impatiently seeking to become martyrs. This is ridiculous and out of all people you should know better. I merely used it, and I stressed it, as an example, from the world of media, to point out that when you repeat something somebody else wrote, it makes you accessory to slander and defamation. That was my response to Talisker claiming that by quoting you it does not mean that he agrees with you.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby DT. » Mon Mar 01, 2010 4:02 pm

Bananiot wrote:DT, where did I say "innocent dead GC's deserved to die"? You need to come clean on this one and I can wait for your response for as long as you like.

You have quoted the following I wrote:

"At the end we were very lucky to get what we got, but being greedy and spoilt, we started a war on the London-Zurich agreements and the results are well known. We allowed the nationalists to dominate us. We never held our ground. May be we deserve what came to us".

The above is a criticism directed at rational people who allowed the fanatics to destroy Cyprus by remaining silent when they should have stood up and be counted.

You also jumped on the lawsuit wagon, hastely, like all those impatiently seeking to become martyrs. This is ridiculous and out of all people you should know better. I merely used it, and I stressed it, as an example, from the world of media, to point out that when you repeat something somebody else wrote, it makes you accessory to slander and defamation. That was my response to Talisker claiming that by quoting you it does not mean that he agrees with you.


Bananiot, I do not for one second believe you are the type of person that would condone the killing of anyone. I am merely pointing out that in your hasty rhetoric to prove your opinions which are one of submission to an occupying force for most people you have reached a point in your debating career on this forum when you have

1) Focused exclusively on a massacre of one side and ignored apart from 1-2 fleeting remarks the tragedy of the other side.

2) Have quoted on multiple posts that the GC side basically deserves wht it got, including easily misinterpreted lines such as
May be we deserve what came to us"


My dear friend what "came to us" was a massive invasion, killings, rapes and displacement of people. I suggest you learn to be more sensitive to the hurt that the majority of the innocents of this community have been through.... and terminate this discriminatory behaviour that has led to near conclusions such as the one you were trying to disprove to me and Talisker.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Bananiot » Mon Mar 01, 2010 5:43 pm

Well, we are slowly getting there. You have reached the conclusion that I care only for "submission to an occupying force" and presumably this is what worries you most. I can set your mind to rest but first you should agree with me that such allegations can be thrown about by all opponents of a negotiated solution simply to discredit the person or the political group or party that seeks such a solution. We have all lived through the period of the ambient atmosphere and surely we can not allow this to haunt us again.

All of us who have realised that the only salvation for this country is a compromise solution, have made many friends across the dividing line. Getting to know each other is a necessary prerequisite for moving the process of solution forward. I have some dear friends in the north, people that share the same aspirations with me, who I value greatly. They do not constitute the occupation forces and very much so, they also want to see the back of the Turkish army and the majority of the settlers. Those who think different are not my friends nor do I know them. Those who want the Turkish army to remain and the Turkish guarantees to remain for ever, have close ties with people of the patriotic type of this forum. This may sound paradoxical, but it is very much so for extremists only survive and flourish when confronted by other extremists. They are the two different sides of the same coin. Hence, given our dire situation, those that in practical terms support submission to the occupation forces, are indeed the extremists in our side who want us to try a recipe that has led to disaster in the past. So, please, look at the bigger picture and try to understand what I am saying, especially these days when our politicians are more than preoccupied with the presidential elections of 2013 rather than the national issue which is supposedly their no. 1 on their agenda.

You wrote

My dear friend what "came to us" was a massive invasion, killings, rapes and displacement of people. I suggest you learn to be more sensitive to the hurt that the majority of the innocents of this community have been through.... and terminate this discriminatory behaviour that has led to near conclusions such as the one you were trying to disprove to me and Talisker.


For a start, I also consider you a friend and I look forward to getting together one of these days. Bring GR along too. For the serious business now. In 1974 we faced a massive invasion which was third time unlucky for us. It is always useful to remember the conditions that brought on this invasion, but we should leave this out this time round. In 1974 it was our turn to suffer. There was massive displacement, killings and rapes, as you wrote. Of course, as in all wars, the innocent paid a hefty price. In the small paragraph you quoted quite out of context, it does not say what I wrote on numerous occasions. On two previous occasions we basically invited Turkey to step in. First in 1964 and then again in 1967. Our skin then was saved by the dreaded angloamericans at the last moment then. Still we did not learn. We allowed the fanatics to rule our lives and at the end we got what was coming. Sorry to sound cynical but this is what any unbiased observer studying the Cyprob would tell you.

The innocent people who suffered greatly then (I can personalise here but I will not do it) are correct to feel bitter about the Turkish army but they should also remember that the catastrophe came upon us because our fanatics ruled supreme at the time. Without their actions Turkey could not have invaded and there wouldn't be any problems with the TC community in the first place, if I might say so.

The conclusions you, Talisker or anyone else may reach, do not really concern me. These are my views and we can debate them if you like in a civilised manner. Remember, almost before I wrote anything of substance in this forum, I was branded a traitor by forumers like Piratis and a good few others. I will respond to these people in the way I choose and my responses have nothing to do with the "poor innocents" of any side so please do not try to dramatise things. I have no time for this.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby Oracle » Mon Mar 01, 2010 7:43 pm

Bananiot wrote:... On two previous occasions we basically invited Turkey to step in. First in 1964 and then again in 1967....


More of your warped opinions!
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby B25 » Mon Mar 01, 2010 8:47 pm

Oracle wrote:
Bananiot wrote:... On two previous occasions we basically invited Turkey to step in. First in 1964 and then again in 1967....


More of your warped opinions!

Yes I can see what he is trying to say, we invited them in, and I quote, "... May be we deserve what came to us...."

Well just about sums this guy up. Whatever we say he will always see the other side first.

Cheers Ban, you'd make a great neighbour!
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6543
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Postby miltiades » Mon Mar 01, 2010 9:14 pm

Far greater neighbour than you B25 !!!
I have met Bananiot on a few occasions and consider him to be a perfect gentleman and a true compassionate Cypriot .
His knowledge of the Cyprob is not clouded by bigotry , unlike some who see themselves as "experts" on issues concerning our island. He presents his views , as he is entitled to do so , with fair mindedness and civility .
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests