The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


US does not back Turkish positions - Clinton

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby GeorgeV97qaue » Thu Feb 25, 2010 5:49 pm

YFred wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
runaway wrote:
Get Real! wrote: south cypriots ONLY understand the stick! It’s the only language they know!


Right. Wasn't it how we managed to save innocent TCs from murders?

What innocent TCs? If these criminals were innocent they’d be in Turkey not Cyprus!

And what murders were they? Why don't you tell us about them?

GR Fuck off you bastardo.

What about all the murders you TC's commited. How about when your TMT bomb its own people and then blamed TC's. Dont act the innocent. You TC's are as much to blame as the GC's.
GeorgeV97qaue
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:57 pm

Postby Gasman » Thu Feb 25, 2010 6:48 pm

I'm glad we have posters like Palio in here. Proof that there are GCs that are reasonable and moderate in their thinking. Who don't hate all TCs and Turks and really do want to see Cyprus united. And whose expectations are realistic.

We all want the fairy tale in some dept of our lives but the sensible ones want an ACHIEVABLE fairytale ending not a Grimm Bros one.
Gasman
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3561
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 6:18 pm

Re: US does not back Turkish positions - Clinton

Postby aussieturk » Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:06 am

paliometoxo wrote:WASHINGTON - US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Wednesday at the Senate that ''we strongly support the continuing negotiations under UN auspices for a bizonal, bicommunal resolution on Cyprus,'' and noted that the US did not ascribe to Turkish positions..


Bizonal - I thought that is what we have now :)
User avatar
aussieturk
Member
Member
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:19 am

Re: US does not back Turkish positions - Clinton

Postby Epiktitos » Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:10 am

aussieturk wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:WASHINGTON - US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Wednesday at the Senate that ''we strongly support the continuing negotiations under UN auspices for a bizonal, bicommunal resolution on Cyprus,'' and noted that the US did not ascribe to Turkish positions..


Bizonal - I thought that is what we have now :)

The UN resolution does not include the word contiguous. In what way was the set-up after 1963 not bizonal?
Epiktitos
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:21 am

Re: US does not back Turkish positions - Clinton

Postby aussieturk » Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:21 am

Epiktitos wrote:
aussieturk wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:WASHINGTON - US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Wednesday at the Senate that ''we strongly support the continuing negotiations under UN auspices for a bizonal, bicommunal resolution on Cyprus,'' and noted that the US did not ascribe to Turkish positions..


Bizonal - I thought that is what we have now :)

The UN resolution does not include the word contiguous. In what way was the set-up after 1963 not bizonal?


It didn't work did it
User avatar
aussieturk
Member
Member
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:19 am

Re: US does not back Turkish positions - Clinton

Postby Epiktitos » Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:32 am

aussieturk wrote:
Epiktitos wrote:
aussieturk wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:WASHINGTON - US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Wednesday at the Senate that ''we strongly support the continuing negotiations under UN auspices for a bizonal, bicommunal resolution on Cyprus,'' and noted that the US did not ascribe to Turkish positions..


Bizonal - I thought that is what we have now :)

The UN resolution does not include the word contiguous. In what way was the set-up after 1963 not bizonal?


It didn't work did it

And how's the contiguous version going for you?
Epiktitos
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:21 am

Re: US does not back Turkish positions - Clinton

Postby aussieturk » Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:48 am

Epiktitos wrote:
aussieturk wrote:
Epiktitos wrote:
aussieturk wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:WASHINGTON - US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Wednesday at the Senate that ''we strongly support the continuing negotiations under UN auspices for a bizonal, bicommunal resolution on Cyprus,'' and noted that the US did not ascribe to Turkish positions..


Bizonal - I thought that is what we have now :)

The UN resolution does not include the word contiguous. In what way was the set-up after 1963 not bizonal?


It didn't work did it

And how's the contiguous version going for you?


Peace, no violence
User avatar
aussieturk
Member
Member
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:19 am

Re: US does not back Turkish positions - Clinton

Postby Epiktitos » Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:54 am

aussieturk wrote:
Epiktitos wrote:
aussieturk wrote:
Epiktitos wrote:
aussieturk wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:WASHINGTON - US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Wednesday at the Senate that ''we strongly support the continuing negotiations under UN auspices for a bizonal, bicommunal resolution on Cyprus,'' and noted that the US did not ascribe to Turkish positions..


Bizonal - I thought that is what we have now :)

The UN resolution does not include the word contiguous. In what way was the set-up after 1963 not bizonal?


It didn't work did it

And how's the contiguous version going for you?


Peace, no violence

You seem to be doing quite a bit of complaining in another thread...something about a trade deficit about as big as the GDP of the occupied territory?
Epiktitos
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:21 am

Re: US does not back Turkish positions - Clinton

Postby aussieturk » Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:58 am

Epiktitos wrote:
aussieturk wrote:
Epiktitos wrote:
aussieturk wrote:
Epiktitos wrote:
aussieturk wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:WASHINGTON - US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Wednesday at the Senate that ''we strongly support the continuing negotiations under UN auspices for a bizonal, bicommunal resolution on Cyprus,'' and noted that the US did not ascribe to Turkish positions..


Bizonal - I thought that is what we have now :)

The UN resolution does not include the word contiguous. In what way was the set-up after 1963 not bizonal?


It didn't work did it

And how's the contiguous version going for you?


Peace, no violence

You seem to be doing quite a bit of complaining in another thread...something about a trade deficit about as big as the GDP of the occupied territory?


Not complaining at all my friend, just stating the situation. PEACE

:D
User avatar
aussieturk
Member
Member
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:19 am

Re: US does not back Turkish positions - Clinton

Postby Epiktitos » Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:24 am

aussieturk wrote:
Epiktitos wrote:
aussieturk wrote:
Epiktitos wrote:
aussieturk wrote:
Epiktitos wrote:
aussieturk wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:WASHINGTON - US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Wednesday at the Senate that ''we strongly support the continuing negotiations under UN auspices for a bizonal, bicommunal resolution on Cyprus,'' and noted that the US did not ascribe to Turkish positions..


Bizonal - I thought that is what we have now :)

The UN resolution does not include the word contiguous. In what way was the set-up after 1963 not bizonal?


It didn't work did it

And how's the contiguous version going for you?


Peace, no violence

You seem to be doing quite a bit of complaining in another thread...something about a trade deficit about as big as the GDP of the occupied territory?


my friend

Dream on.
Epiktitos
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:21 am

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests