YFred wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:Kikapu wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:I think a far more interesting question is why the AKP is supporting EU membership. Back when the Islamic fundamentalists in Turkey were headed by Erbakan, the position was simple. They opposed EU membership and instead wanted Turkey to realign itself with its Islamic neighbours to the east. Suddenly and pardoxically, the Islamists have become more pro-EU than the secularists. I wonder if this is:
1) because the AKP, even though all of its leading lights have their roots in political Islam, has undergone a deep ideological transformation and now heartily backs Mustafa Kemal's vision of Turkey joining the ranks of Western nations,
2) for instrumental reasons, given that the AKP can be argued to have its base among people who have become rich and powerful as a result of industrialisation in more conservative regions of Anatolia, and who are socially conservative but economically liberal and see opportunities to grow their businesses within the EU, or
3) simply a cynical ploy, either to keep the army of their backs while they gradually roll back the achievements of the Republic, as the secularists would see it, or even because they have calculated that the EU will ultimately close its doors on Turkey thus leading to a groundswell of support in favour of building closer ties with the Islamic world.
or
4) It's the only way the Islamic religious political parties can survive in Turkey from the military coups by being in the EU, which will protect their freedom of religious expression, Tim.!
Sure, that's what I meant by "keeping the army off their backs". In fact, I believe that the answer is a mixture of the above three.
So USA has no say in what the turks do in Turkey?
Sure. If it were not for the US there would have been a coup by now.