Cyprus-Forum.com

[londoner]

Correct me if I am wrong but the Treaty of Guarantee was part of the 1960 constitution which still exists does it not

[bill cobbett]

On other similar shattering news, the Board of Directors of Ethnikos Latsion has decided to buy new nets for its 2 five a side goals. RFP's have been sent to a company in Germany where we hear the same nets are used in a popular High School there!!

Excellent news. Are you in a position to give CF a worldwide exclusive, early indication of the colour of the new nets please mate? .... and are they polypropylene?
___________
baycrap

[kurupetos]

Correct me if I am wrong but the Treaty of Guarantee was part of the 1960 constitution which still exists does it not

The 1960 constitution provided for some other interesting things, if you care to read it in full.

If you do, you will soon realise why the "TRNC" will never be recognized, among other things.

[miltiades]

Correct me if I am wrong but the Treaty of Guarantee was part of the 1960 constitution which still exists does it not

The teaty of guarantee called upon the three guarantor powers to respect and protect the independence and territorial integrity of the RoC .
Do you think than maybe it has been violated and therefore in legal terms rendered null and void ..
One of the Guarantor powers invaded and occupied a large part of Cyprus subsequentltly declaring this occupied part as a separate nation from that which this guarantor power had signed to protect.

[kurupetos]

Correct me if I am wrong but the Treaty of Guarantee was part of the 1960 constitution which still exists does it not

The teaty of guarantee called upon the three guarantor powers to respect and protect the independence and territorial integrity of the RoC .
Do you think than maybe it has been violated and therefore in legal terms rendered null and void ..
One of the Guarantor powers invaded and occupied a large part of Cyprus subsequentltly declaring this occupied part as a separate nation from that which this guarantor power had signed to protect.

No law becomes void if someone violates it.

[paliometoxo]

Correct me if I am wrong but the Treaty of Guarantee was part of the 1960 constitution which still exists does it not

you cant revert back to them agreements when it suits you, we can safely say it did not say anything about two states or keeping 40 thousand army men here either does it? we can agree those agreements went out the window many decades ago

[miltiades]

Correct me if I am wrong but the Treaty of Guarantee was part of the 1960 constitution which still exists does it not

The teaty of guarantee called upon the three guarantor powers to respect and protect the independence and territorial integrity of the RoC .
Do you think than maybe it has been violated and therefore in legal terms rendered null and void ..
One of the Guarantor powers invaded and occupied a large part of Cyprus subsequentltly declaring this occupied part as a separate nation from that which this guarantor power had signed to protect.

No law becomes void if someone violates it.

I was reffering to the stature of guarantors not the law , a contract if you like that one party defaults , the contract can not be enforced by the party that caused the default of the said contract .

[Viewpoint]

Turkey rightfully intervened to solve the problems and to this day we are unable to solve them thats why they remain

[bill cobbett]

Correct me if I am wrong but the Treaty of Guarantee was part of the 1960 constitution which still exists does it not

The teaty of guarantee called upon the three guarantor powers to respect and protect the independence and territorial integrity of the RoC .
Do you think than maybe it has been violated and therefore in legal terms rendered null and void ..
One of the Guarantor powers invaded and occupied a large part of Cyprus subsequentltly declaring this occupied part as a separate nation from that which this guarantor power had signed to protect.

No law becomes void if someone violates it.

I was reffering to the stature of guarantors not the law , a contract if you like that one party defaults , the contract can not be enforced by the party that caused the default of the said contract .

Agree with our Beloved Pappou on this.

We ain't talking "laws" , we're talking about a Contractural Agreement, where one party to the agreement starts a coup, another uses that as a pretext to invade and occupy, and the third party stands idly by twiddling thumbs.

Agreement therefore Null and Void.

[humanist]

TC's if you can afford another 30 or even 5 years of status quo ..... stay as you are and vote for a new leader ......... good luck