The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


TRNC PARLIAMENT TO CONVENE AN EXTRAORDINARY SESSION

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby fwnh » Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:59 am

measures about guns?
fwnh
Member
Member
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 4:24 pm

Postby DT. » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:07 am

DT. wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:yes i understand what it means :)

thats something we will never accept.. two states in any form


then your leader is lieing yet again because a two state solution is on offer not a unitary state



Yes, well, you can appreciate what it's like, when someone refuses to reciprocate your apologise to help move matters forward. You start treating them with utter contempt.


the apology was insincere so it was not taken seriously


please explain why it was insincere?


I'm interested to know VP..Why do you think it was insincere?
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Malapapa » Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:16 am

DT. wrote:
DT. wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:yes i understand what it means :)

thats something we will never accept.. two states in any form


then your leader is lieing yet again because a two state solution is on offer not a unitary state



Yes, well, you can appreciate what it's like, when someone refuses to reciprocate your apologise to help move matters forward. You start treating them with utter contempt.


the apology was insincere so it was not taken seriously


please explain why it was insincere?


I'm interested to know VP..Why do you think it was insincere?


But how will we know that VP is being sincere in his answer - so it can be taken seriously?
User avatar
Malapapa
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:13 pm

Postby Malapapa » Thu Feb 25, 2010 1:09 am

Malapapa wrote:
DT. wrote:
DT. wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:yes i understand what it means :)

thats something we will never accept.. two states in any form


then your leader is lieing yet again because a two state solution is on offer not a unitary state



Yes, well, you can appreciate what it's like, when someone refuses to reciprocate your apologise to help move matters forward. You start treating them with utter contempt.


the apology was insincere so it was not taken seriously


please explain why it was insincere?


I'm interested to know VP..Why do you think it was insincere?


But how will we know that VP is being sincere in his answer - so it can be taken seriously?


I see this was ignored. That's the problem with Cyprus Turks. They always avoid addressing the uncomfortable questions facing them.
User avatar
Malapapa
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:13 pm

Postby YFred » Thu Feb 25, 2010 1:13 am

Malapapa wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
DT. wrote:
DT. wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:yes i understand what it means :)

thats something we will never accept.. two states in any form


then your leader is lieing yet again because a two state solution is on offer not a unitary state



Yes, well, you can appreciate what it's like, when someone refuses to reciprocate your apologise to help move matters forward. You start treating them with utter contempt.


the apology was insincere so it was not taken seriously


please explain why it was insincere?


I'm interested to know VP..Why do you think it was insincere?


But how will we know that VP is being sincere in his answer - so it can be taken seriously?


I see this was ignored. That's the problem with Cyprus Turks. They always avoid addressing the uncomfortable questions facing them.

What was wrong with my answer? Did you not like it?
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Malapapa » Thu Feb 25, 2010 1:27 am

YFred wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
DT. wrote:
DT. wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:yes i understand what it means :)

thats something we will never accept.. two states in any form


then your leader is lieing yet again because a two state solution is on offer not a unitary state



Yes, well, you can appreciate what it's like, when someone refuses to reciprocate your apologise to help move matters forward. You start treating them with utter contempt.


the apology was insincere so it was not taken seriously


please explain why it was insincere?


I'm interested to know VP..Why do you think it was insincere?


But how will we know that VP is being sincere in his answer - so it can be taken seriously?


I see this was ignored. That's the problem with Cyprus Turks. They always avoid addressing the uncomfortable questions facing them.

What was wrong with my answer? Did you not like it?


I'm not answering.
User avatar
Malapapa
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:13 pm

Postby YFred » Thu Feb 25, 2010 1:33 am

Malapapa wrote:
YFred wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
DT. wrote:
DT. wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:yes i understand what it means :)

thats something we will never accept.. two states in any form


then your leader is lieing yet again because a two state solution is on offer not a unitary state



Yes, well, you can appreciate what it's like, when someone refuses to reciprocate your apologise to help move matters forward. You start treating them with utter contempt.


the apology was insincere so it was not taken seriously


please explain why it was insincere?


I'm interested to know VP..Why do you think it was insincere?


But how will we know that VP is being sincere in his answer - so it can be taken seriously?


I see this was ignored. That's the problem with Cyprus Turks. They always avoid addressing the uncomfortable questions facing them.

What was wrong with my answer? Did you not like it?


I'm not answering.

At least have the courtesy of taking the 5th :lol: :lol:
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Viewpoint » Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:06 pm

Your leader mumbled it amongst abunch of other words which made it insincere.

Why not in front of the world media during a pre arranged press conference.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby boulio » Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:38 pm

what does it matter if its on the record in front of one reporter or 1,000 reporters?
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby Viewpoint » Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:12 pm

boulio wrote:what does it matter if its on the record in front of one reporter or 1,000 reporters?


one local reporter does not maketh Newsno one has botheted to take him seriously as everyone knows it was half hearted and insincere just to gain a few more brownie points.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests