DT. wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote:paliometoxo wrote:yes i understand what it means
thats something we will never accept.. two states in any form
then your leader is lieing yet again because a two state solution is on offer not a unitary state
Yes, well, you can appreciate what it's like, when someone refuses to reciprocate your apologise to help move matters forward. You start treating them with utter contempt.
the apology was insincere so it was not taken seriously
please explain why it was insincere?
DT. wrote:DT. wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote:paliometoxo wrote:yes i understand what it means
thats something we will never accept.. two states in any form
then your leader is lieing yet again because a two state solution is on offer not a unitary state
Yes, well, you can appreciate what it's like, when someone refuses to reciprocate your apologise to help move matters forward. You start treating them with utter contempt.
the apology was insincere so it was not taken seriously
please explain why it was insincere?
I'm interested to know VP..Why do you think it was insincere?
Malapapa wrote:DT. wrote:DT. wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote:paliometoxo wrote:yes i understand what it means
thats something we will never accept.. two states in any form
then your leader is lieing yet again because a two state solution is on offer not a unitary state
Yes, well, you can appreciate what it's like, when someone refuses to reciprocate your apologise to help move matters forward. You start treating them with utter contempt.
the apology was insincere so it was not taken seriously
please explain why it was insincere?
I'm interested to know VP..Why do you think it was insincere?
But how will we know that VP is being sincere in his answer - so it can be taken seriously?
Malapapa wrote:Malapapa wrote:DT. wrote:DT. wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote:paliometoxo wrote:yes i understand what it means
thats something we will never accept.. two states in any form
then your leader is lieing yet again because a two state solution is on offer not a unitary state
Yes, well, you can appreciate what it's like, when someone refuses to reciprocate your apologise to help move matters forward. You start treating them with utter contempt.
the apology was insincere so it was not taken seriously
please explain why it was insincere?
I'm interested to know VP..Why do you think it was insincere?
But how will we know that VP is being sincere in his answer - so it can be taken seriously?
I see this was ignored. That's the problem with Cyprus Turks. They always avoid addressing the uncomfortable questions facing them.
YFred wrote:Malapapa wrote:Malapapa wrote:DT. wrote:DT. wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote:paliometoxo wrote:yes i understand what it means
thats something we will never accept.. two states in any form
then your leader is lieing yet again because a two state solution is on offer not a unitary state
Yes, well, you can appreciate what it's like, when someone refuses to reciprocate your apologise to help move matters forward. You start treating them with utter contempt.
the apology was insincere so it was not taken seriously
please explain why it was insincere?
I'm interested to know VP..Why do you think it was insincere?
But how will we know that VP is being sincere in his answer - so it can be taken seriously?
I see this was ignored. That's the problem with Cyprus Turks. They always avoid addressing the uncomfortable questions facing them.
What was wrong with my answer? Did you not like it?
Malapapa wrote:YFred wrote:Malapapa wrote:Malapapa wrote:DT. wrote:DT. wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote:paliometoxo wrote:yes i understand what it means
thats something we will never accept.. two states in any form
then your leader is lieing yet again because a two state solution is on offer not a unitary state
Yes, well, you can appreciate what it's like, when someone refuses to reciprocate your apologise to help move matters forward. You start treating them with utter contempt.
the apology was insincere so it was not taken seriously
please explain why it was insincere?
I'm interested to know VP..Why do you think it was insincere?
But how will we know that VP is being sincere in his answer - so it can be taken seriously?
I see this was ignored. That's the problem with Cyprus Turks. They always avoid addressing the uncomfortable questions facing them.
What was wrong with my answer? Did you not like it?
I'm not answering.
boulio wrote:what does it matter if its on the record in front of one reporter or 1,000 reporters?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests